National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$39.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Technology Commercialization: Russian Challenges, American Lessons (1998)
Office of International Affairs (OIA)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix B: Excerpts from the Bayh-Dole Act." Technology Commercialization: Russian Challenges, American Lessons. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1998.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
92
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


protect the security of such activities, or (iv) when the funding agreement includes the operation of a Government-owned, contractor-operated facility of the Department of Energy primarily dedicated to that Department's naval nuclear propulsion or weapons related programs and all funding agreement limitations under this subparagraph on the contractor's right to elect title to a subject invention are limited to inventions occurring under the above two programs of the Department of Energy. This rights of the nonprofit organization or small business firm shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (c) of this section and the other provisions of this chapter. (Amended November 8, 1994, Public Law 98-620, sec. 501(3), 98 Stat. 3364.)

(b)(1) The rights of the Government under subsection (a) shall not be exercised by a Federal agency unless it first determines that at least one of the conditions identified in clauses (I) through (iii) of subsection (a) exists. Except in the case of subsection (a)(iii), the agency shall file with the Secretary of Commerce, within thirty days after the award of the applicable funding agreement, a copy of such determination. In the case of a determination under subsection (a)(ii), the statement shall include an analysis justifying the determination. In the case of determinations applicable to funding agreements with small business firms, copies shall also be sent to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. If the Secretary of Commerce believes that any individual determination or pattern of determinations is contrary to the policies and objectives of this chapter, the Secretary shall so advise the head of the agency concerned and the Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, and recommend corrective actions.

(2) Whenever the Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy has determined that one or more Federal agencies are utilizing the authority of clause )I) or (ii) of subsection (a) of this section in a manner that is contrary to the policies and objectives of this chapter the Administrator is authorized to issue regulations describing classes of situations in which agencies may not exercise the authorities of those clauses. (Amended November 8, 1994, Public Law 98-620, sec. 501(4A), 98 Stat. 3365.)

(3) At least once each year, the Comptroller General shall transmit a report to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and House of Representatives on the manner in which this chapter is being implemented by the agencies and on such other aspects of Government patent policies and practices with respect to federally funded inventions as the Comptroller General believes appropriate.

(4) If the contractor believes that a determination is contrary to the policies and objectives of this chapter or constitutes an abuse of discretion by the agency, the determination shall be subject to the last paragraph of section 203(2). (Added November 8, 1994, Public Law 98-620, sec. 501(4A), 98 Stat. 3365.)

Page
92
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Perspective From a University with an Industry-Funded Research Program (1-7)
Commercializing University Technology (8-15)
Legal Issues of Special Concern to Technology Commercialization (16-23)
An Industrial Perspective on Technology Commercialization in the 1990s and Beyond (24-32)
Research, Technology Development, and Commercialization (33-40)
View from a National Laboratory (41-43)
The Role of Industrial Institutes in Creating and Maintaining Russia's Industrial Potential (44-49)
Problems of Taxation and Technology Commercialization in Russia (50-54)
Commercialization of Scientific and Technical Developments at Higher Education Institutes (55-59)
Development of Legal Regulations for Technology Commercialization in Russia (60-66)
Commercializing for the Polymer Industry: The Experience of an Academy Institute (67-74)
The Main Problem in Commercialization of Scientific Research Results (75-84)
Areas of Further Consideration (85-88)
Appendix A: Workshop on Technology Commercialization Agenda (89-90)
Appendix B: Excerpts from the Bayh-Dole Act (91-98)
Appendix C: Excerpts from the National Competitiveness Technology Transfer Act of 1989 (99-104)
Appendix D: Commercializing Technology (105-106)
Appendix E: U.S. Patent Law Provisions that Promote University-Based Patenting and Technology Transfer (107-111)
Appendix F: Description of the Centennial Campus (112-113)
Appendix G: Innovation Research Fund (114-115)
Appendix H: First Flight Venture Center (116-116)
Appendix I: NIST Advanced Technology Program (117-119)
Appendix J: The Industrial Research Institute, Inc. (120-121)
Appendix K: NSF Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers Program (122-128)
Appendix L: U.S. Tax Policy Issues (129-132)
Appendix M: University Unrelated Business Income Policy (133-134)
Appendix N: Visits in Russia and the United States (135-138)