National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix A: Study Mandate
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Workshop Agenda." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1999. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6406.
×

APPENDIX B
Workshop on Functional Capacity and Work Requirements as They Relate to SSA's Disability Decision Process Research

Committee to Review SSA's Disability Decision Process Research National Academy of Sciences/Institute of Medicine Cecil and Ida Green Building, Conference Room 104

2001 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. June 4-5, 1998

WORKSHOP AGENDA

Thursday, June 4

 

 

9:00–9:15 a.m.

Welcome and Introduction

Dorothy Rice, Chair

9:15–9:25 a.m.

Purpose and Goals of the Workshop

Dorothy Rice

 

OPENING SESSION

 

9:25–10:30 a.m.

Measuring Functional Capacity of Persons with Disabilities in Light of Emerging Demands in the Workplace

Paper presented by Edward Yelin

 

(Commentary and discussion will follow)

Discussant: Janet Norwood

 

SESSION ONE

 

10:45–12:30 p.m.

Components of Functional Capacity Domains (Cognitive, Psychosocial, Motor and Sensory/Perceptual) with Work Requirements

Discussion Leader: Howard Goldman

 

• What are the specific components of the functional capacity domains?

Discussants: Edwin Fleishman Cille Kennedy

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Workshop Agenda." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1999. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6406.
×

 

• How are the specific components linked to demands of work?

 

 

• Is it possible to develop a baseline of work requirements? Can O*NET be used or adapted to meet SSA's need for an occupational classification system?

 

 

SESSION TWO

 

1:30–3:30 p.m.

Desired Characteristics of Instruments to Measure Functional Capacity to Work

Discussion Leader: Alan Jette

 

• What are the strengths and limitations of self-reports, proxy reports, performance testing, and clinical observation?

Discussants: Allen Heinemann Constantine Lyketsos

 

• How do the strengths and weaknesses of different measurement approaches vary across the different domains of functioning?

 

 

• To what extent should assistive devices be considered in measuring functional capacity?

 

 

• Do different populations have different measurement requirements (e.g., schizophrenia versus arthritis versus spinal injury versus Alzheimer's disease)?

 

 

SESSION THREE

 

3:45–4:45 p.m.

The Use of Functional Capacity Measures in Public and Private Programs in the United States and in Other Countries

Discussion Leader: Patricia Owens

 

• What has been their experience in the use of functional capacity measures in determining disability?

Discussants: Richard Burkhauser Ian Basnett

 

• What aspects of their measurement of functional capacity might be relevant for SSA's needs?

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Workshop Agenda." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1999. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6406.
×

4:45–5:30 p.m.

General Discussion

 

5.30 p.m.

Adjourn—Reception

 

Friday, June 5

 

 

 

SESSION FOUR

 

9:00–10:15 a.m.

Adapting Measurement of Functional Capacity to Work to SSA's Disability Decision Process

Discussion Leader: Virginia Reno

 

• What are the criteria for a ''successful'' measurement of functional capacity to work?

Discussants: Lisa Iezzoni David Stapleton

 

• Feasibility and practicality of designing and administering (i.e., safety, cost, etc.) measures of functional capacity to work.

 

 

• Technical issues of incorporating reliability, validity, sensitivity and specificity in the context of SSA's disability decision process.

 

 

• How can these measurement approaches be linked to work requirements in the context of SSA's disability decision process?

 

10:30–11:00 a.m.

Rapporteur's Review of Major Issues Identified

Jane West Kristen Robinson

11:00–12:00 p.m.

General Discussion

 

12:00–12:15 p.m.

Concluding Remarks

Dorothy Rice

12:15 p.m.

Adjourn

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Workshop Agenda." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1999. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6406.
×
Page 96
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Workshop Agenda." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1999. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6406.
×
Page 97
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Workshop Agenda." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 1999. Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/6406.
×
Page 98
Next: Appendix C: List of Participants »
Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop Get This Book
×
 Measuring Functional Capacity and Work Requirements: Summary of a Workshop
Buy Paperback | $58.00 Buy Ebook | $46.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Social Security Administration (SSA) is reengineering its disability claims process for providing cash benefits and medical assistance to blind and disabled persons under the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) program and the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Program (Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act). As one element of this effort, SSA has proposed a redesigned disability determination process. The agency has undertaken a multi-year research effort to develop and test the feasibility, validity, reliability, and practicality of the redesigned disability determination process before making any decision about implementing it nationally. SSA requested the National Academy of Sciences to review and provide advice on its research relating to the development of a revised disability decision process, including the approach, survey design, and content of the Disability Evaluation Study (DES). One of the committee's tasks is to examine SSA's research into existing and other developing functional assessment instruments for the redesign efforts and to provide advice for adopting or developing instruments for the redesigned decision process and the DES.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!