National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1981. Innovation and Transfer of U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/720.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1981. Innovation and Transfer of U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/720.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1981. Innovation and Transfer of U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/720.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1981. Innovation and Transfer of U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/720.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1981. Innovation and Transfer of U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/720.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1981. Innovation and Transfer of U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/720.
×
Page R6

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Innovation and Transfer of U. S . Air Force Manufacturing Technology Three Case Studies a repor t to the U. S . Air Force Systems Command by the Committee on Computer-Aided Manu factur ing Manufacturing Studies Board Assembly of Eng ineer ing Ilational Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D. C. 1981

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for the i r spec ial competences and with regard for appropr late balance . This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was established by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academv ' ~ Duroo':e': of furthering knowledge and of advising the federal government. , _ ~ _ En, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ The Council operates in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy under the authority of its congressional charter of 1863, which establishes the Academy as a private, nonprofit, self-governing membership corporation. The Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in the conduct of ^, · _ _ _ _ _ , ~ their services to the government, the public, and the scientif ic and engineering communities. It is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. The National Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine were established in 1964 and 1970, respectively, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences . This report represents work under Contract E49620-78-0027 between the United States Air Force and the National Academy of Sciences. A`ra i fable f ram: Committee on Computer-Aided Manufacturing National Academy of Sciences 2101 Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418 Printed in the United States of America ii

COMMITTEE ON COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING Joseph Harr ington, Jr . (Cha irman) Consulting Eng ineer James E. Ashton Deputy General Manager for Research and Engineering General Dynamics, Electric Boat Division Avak A`rak fan Vice President, Operations GTE Sylvania Erich Bloch Vice President of Technical Personnel Development IBM Corporation Franc is W. Boulger Senior Technical Advisor (Retired) Batelle Columbus Laboratory Harvey E. Buffum Director of Operations Technology Boeing Commercial Airplane Company Barbara A. Burns Senior Operations Research Analyst Lockheed Georgia Company Dennis Chamot Assistant Director, Department for Professional Employees AFL-CIO David A. Dorman Director, Industrial Engineering McDonnell Aircraft Company Herbert Fox Pope, Evans and Robbins Incorporated Bela Gold Director, Research Program in Industrial Economics Case Western Reserve University Dale B. Hartman Director of Manufacturing Technology Rughe s Al rcr af t Company

William K. Holstein Dean, School of Business State University of New York at Albany Arnold Rriegler Director, Production Operations Collins Transmission Systems Division Rockwell International James F. Lardner Vice President, Components Division Deere and Company Robert J. Mayer Vice President Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. Martin J. McHale Vice President, Systems Development Control Data Corporation M. Eugene Merchant Principal Scientist, Manufacturing Research Cincinnati Milacron Inc. Nam P. Sub Professor of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ar thu r Thomson Director of Manufacturing Engineering Cleveland State University Richard E. Thomas Director, The Center for Strategic Technology Texas A&N University Philip West Technical Director, Process Equipment Development General Motors Corporation Staff: Joel D. Goldhar, Executive Secretary Janice E. Greene, Staff Officer Karen Laughlin, Administrative Assistant 1V

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION RESEARCH PROCEDURES FRAMEWORK AND ITS THEORETICAL UNDERPINNINGS ANALYSIS OF CASE STUDY FINDINGS HIP Casting Consolidation Technology Automated Assembly Fixture Drilling The Advanced Composite Tape Laying Head OBSERVATIONS AD ~C~DATIONS Aspects of Technology Aspects of Transferring Organizations Recommendations for Air Force Action Recommendations for Additional Study APPENDIX A HIP Casting Consolidation Technology APPENDIX B: Automated Assembly Fixture Drilling APPENDIX C: Advanced Composite Tape-Laying Head 1 1 2 6 6 9 12 15 15 16 17 17 19 27 36

Next: Contents of Report »
Innovation and Transfer of U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology Get This Book
×
 Innovation and Transfer of U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology
Buy Paperback | $40.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

Air force sponsorship of manufacturing technology projects is often based on the hope that the results will not only benefit the original contractors, but also will be transferred to other Air Force contractors. While some innovations are readily adopted, others are rejected for a variety of reasons. An understanding of those reasons and the process by which investment decisions are made will enable the Air Force to establish policies and procedures to enhance the likelihood of successful technology transfer to its competitors.

As manufacturing systems become more complex and more integrated, transfers of hardware/software combinations will be increasingly common. Innovation and Transfer of the U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology examines three instances involving manufacturing research and development projects completed under contract to the Air Force to explain why attempted transfers of military sponsored manufacturing technology succeed or fail. The report presents a model based on these three case studies which describes the decision-making process used by potential adopters of innovations.

Based on the case studies, Innovation and Transfer of the U.S. Air Force Manufacturing Technology suggests that more attention be directed towards the characteristics of the technologies, as well as to the aspects of transferring organizations. It proposes changes in contracting procedures to increase the diffusion of such technology and recommends that one or more case studies be conducted on the transfer of manufacturing systems that involve such hardware/software combinations.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!