National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Research Council. 1983. Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/747.
×
Page 39

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

REFERENCE S Ames, B.N., W.E. Durston, E. Yamasaki, and F.D. Lee. Carcinogens and mutagens: A simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70:2281-2285, 1973. Ames, B.N., L.S. Gold, C.B. Sawyer, and W. Havender. Carcinogenic potency, pp. 663-670. In T. Sugimura, S . Kondo, and H. Takebe, Ed s . Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens . New York: Lis s, 1982 . 3. Ames, B.N., and L. Haroun. Letter to the editor. Mutat. Res. 62:393-395, 1979. 4. Ames, BeN. ~ and K. Hooper. Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay? Nature 274:19-20, 1978. 5 . Ame s , B . N ., K. Ho oper, C . B . Sawyer , A. D . Fr iedman , R. Peto, W. Havender, L.S. Gold, T. Haggin, R.H. Harris, and M. Rosenfeld. Care inogenic potency: A progress report, pp. 55-63. In Banbury Report 5. Ethylene Dichloride: A Potential Health Risk? New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1980. 6. Ames, B.N., and J. McCann. Validation of the Salmonella tes t: A reply to Rinkus and Legator. Cancer Res . 41 :4192-4146, 1981. 7 . Anatomy of a human cancer gene . Nature 300 :103 , 1982. B. Andrews, A.W., L.H. Thibault, and W. Li jinsky. Letter to the editor. Mutat. Res. 62: 396-39B, 1979. 9. Andrews, A.W., L.H. Thibault, and W. Li jinsky. The rela- tionship between carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of some polynuclear hydrocarbons. Mutat. Res. 51: 311-318, 1978. 10. Andrews, A.W., L.H. Thibault, and W. Lijinsky. The rela- tionship between mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of some ni trosamines. Hutat. Res. 51: 319-326, 1978. 11. Arlett, C.F. (Coordinator) . The use of cultured mammalian cells in the UKEMS collaborative genotoxicity trial (1981~. Mutat. Res. 100:271-276, 1982. 12. Ashby, J., P.A. Lefevre, J.A. Styles, J. Charlesworth, and D. Paton. Comparisons between carcinogenic potency and mutagenic potency to Salmonella in a series of derivatives of 4 - imethylaminoazobenzene (DAB). Mutat. Res. 93:67-81, 1982. 13. Ashby, J., and J.A. Styles. Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay? Na ture 2 71: 452-455, 19 78. 14. Ashby, J., and J.A. Styles. Factors influencing mutagenic potency ~n vitro. Nature 274: 20-22, 1978. Barrett, J.C., and P.O.P. Ts'o. Relationship between somatic mutation and neoplastic transformation. Proc. Nat I. Acad. Sci. U. S.~. 75: 3297-3301, 1978. 29

16. Barrett, J.C., A. Wang, and J.A. McLachian. Diethyl- ~ ti lbes trot index ices neoplas t ic bans forma t ion wi thou t measurable gene mutation at two loci. Science 212: 1402-1404, 1981. 17. Bartsch, H. Predictive value of mutagenicity tests in chemical carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res. 38 :177-190, 1976. 18. Bartsch, H., C. Malaveille, A.-M. Camus, G. Martel- Planche, G. Brun, A. Hautefeuille, N. Sabatie, A. Barbin, T. Kuroki, C. Drevon, C. Piccoli, and R. Montesano. Validation and comparative studies on IB0 chemicals with S . typh imurium ~ trains and V7 9 Ch inese hams ter ce 1 Is in _ , . the presence of various metabolizing systems. Mutat. Res. 76: 1-50, 1980. Bartsch, H., C. Halaveille, H.F. Stich, E.C. Miller, and J .A. Miller. Comparative electrophiticity, mutagenicity, DNA repair induction activity, and carcinogenicity of some N- and O-acyl derivatives of N-hydroxy-2-aminofluorene. Cancer Res. 37 :1461-1467, 1977. 20. Bartsch, H., C. Malaveille, R. Tierney, P.L. Grover, and P. Sims. The association of bacterial mutagenicity of hydrocarbon-derived "bay region" dihydrodioln with the Iball indices for carcinogenicity and with the extent of DNA-binding on mouse skin of the parent hydrocarbons. Chern.-Biol. Interact. 26:185-196, 1979. 21. Bartsch, H., L. Tomatis, and C. Mala~reille. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons between mutagenic and carcinogenic activities of chemicals, pp. 35-72. In J.A. Heddle, Ed. Mutagenicity: New Horizons in Genetic Toxicology. New York: Academic Press, 1982. 22. Berenblum, I., and V. Armuth. Two indepedent aspects of tumor promotion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 651: 51-63, 1981. 23. Berenblum, I., and R. Shubik. A new, quantitative approach to the study of the stages of chemical carcino- genesis in the mouse's skin. Brit. J. Cancer 1:383-391, 194 7 . Berns tein, L., J. Kaldor, J. McCann, and M.C. Pike. An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test. MuLat. Res. 97 :26 7-281, 1982 . Bishop, J.M., and H. Varmus. Functions and origins of retroviral transforming genes, pp. 999-1108. In R. Weiss, N. Teich, H. Varmus, and J. Coffin, Eds. kNA Tumor Viruses. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1982. 26. Boveri, T. Zur Frage der Entstehung maligner Tumoren. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1914. 64 pp. 27. Bradley, M.O., B. 8huyon, M.O. Francis, R. Langenbach, A. Peterson, and E. Huberman. Mutagenesis by chemical agents in V79 Chinese hamster cells: A review and analysis of the literature. A report of the GENE-TOX Program. Mutat. Res. 87:81-142, 1981. 30

2 ~ . Bramb i l l a , G., M . Cavanna , A. Pino , and L. Robb iano . Quantitative correlation among DNA damaging potency of six N~nitroso compounds and their potency in inducing tumor growth and bacterial mutation. Carcinogenesis 2 :425-429, 1981. 29. Breelow, N.E., and J.B. Beckwith. Epidemiological features of Wilms' tumor: Results of the National Wilms' Tumor Study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 68:429-436, 1982. 30. Brown, M.M., J.S. Wassom, H.V. Malling, M.D. Shelby, and E.S. van Halle. Literature survey of bacterial, fungal, and Drosophila assay systems used in the evaluation of selected chemical compounds for mutagenic activity. J. Nat 1. Cancer Ins t . 62: 841-8 71, 197 9. 31. Brusick, D.J. Principles of Genetic Toxicology. New York: Plenum Press, 1980. 279 pp. 32. Burnet, F.M. Cancer: Somatic-genetic considerations. Adv. Can. Res. 28:1-29, 1978. 33. Cairns, J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cance r . Nature 255: 19 7-200, 19 7 5 . 34. Cairns, J. The origin of human cancers. Nature 289 : 353-35 7, 19 81. 35. Campbell, T.C. Chemical carcinogens and human risk assessment. Fed. Proc . 39: 2467-2484, 1980. 36. Chang, E.H., M.E. Furth, E.M. Scolnick, and D.R. Lowy. Tumorigenic transformation of mammalian cells induced by normal human gene homologous to the oncogen of Harvey murine sarcoma virus. Nature 297:479-483, 1982. 37. Clayson, D.B. Carcinogens and carcinogenesis enhancers. Mutat. Res. 86:217-229, 1981. 38. Clive, D. Comparative chemical mutagenicity: Can we make risk estimates?, pp. 1039-1066. In F.J. de Serres and M.D. Shelby, Eds. Comparative Chemical Mutagenesis. New York: Plenum Press, 1981. 39. Clive, D., R.O. Johnson, J.F.S. Spector, A.G. Batson, and M.M.M. Brown. Validation and characterization of the L517BY/TK+/ mouse lymph oma mutagen assay system. Mutat. Res. 59:61-108, 1979. 40. Cohen, A.J., F.P. Li, S. Berg, D.J. Marchetto, S. Tesi, S.C. Jacobs, and R.S. Brown. Hereditary renal-cel1 carci- noma associated with a chromosomal translocation..N. Eng. J. Med. 301:592-595, 1979. 41. Coombs, M.M., C. Dixon, and A-M. Kissonerghis. Evaluation of the mutagenicity of compounde of known carcinogenic- ity, belonging to benz ~ aJanthracene, chrysene, and cyclo- penta ~ a ~ phenanthrene neries, us ing Ame s ' ~ tes t . Cancer Res. 36 :4525-4529, 1976. 42. Crouch, E., and R. Wilson. Interepecies comparison of c arc inogenic potency. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 5: 1095-~lI8, 1979. te Serres, F.J., and J. Ashby, Eds. Evaluation of Short-Term Tests for Carcinogens. Report of the Inter- national Collaborative Program. New York: ElsevieriNorth Ho l land, 19 81 . 82 7 pp . 31

44. Eeken, J.C.J., and F.H. Sobele. Modification of insertion mutation events in Drosophila by END, MMS, or deficient DNA~repai r, p. 146. In Environmental Mutagen Society . Program and Abstracts, San Antonio, TX. Bethesda, MD: Environmental Mutagen Society, 1983. 45. Fahmy, M.J., and O.G. Fahmy. Altered control of gene activity in the some by carcinogens. Hutat. Res. 72: 165-172, 1980. Fahmy, M.J., and O.G. Fahmy. Intervening DNA insertions and the alterations of gene expression by carcinogens. Cancer Res. 40 :3374-3382, 1980. Fishbein, L. Potential carcinogenic and mutagenic indus- trial chemicals. I. Alkylating agents. J. Toxicol. Environ. Heal th 6 :1 133-1 17 7 , 1980. 48. Garner, R.C., and P.J. Hertzog. Letter to the editor. Nature 289:627, 1981. Glatt, H.R., H. Schwind, F. Za jdela, A. Croisy, P.C. Jacquignon, and F. Oesch. Mutagenicity of 43 structurally re lated he terocyc 1 ic compounds and i ts re let ionship to their carcinogenicity. Mutat. Res. 66 :307-32B, 1979. 50. Gold, L. S., C. Sawyer, N.K. Hooper, W.R. Havender, L. Bernstein, R. Peto, M.C. Pike, and B.N. Ames. A carcino- genic potency data base of the standardized resul~cs of animal bioassays. Cancer Res. (~ubmitted for publication) 51. Harris, H. Some thoughts about genetics, differentiation, and malignancy. Somat. Cell Genet. 5:923-930, 1979. Harvey, R.G. Polycyclic hydrocarbons and cancer. Amer. Sci. 70: 386-393, 1982. 53. Hoel, D.G., N.L. Raplan, and M.W. Anderson. Implication o f nonlinear kinetics on ri~k estimation in carcino- genesis. Science 219 :1032-1037, 1983. 54. Ilollstein, M., J. McCann, F.A. Angelosanto, and W.W. Nichols. Short-term tests for carcinogens and mutagens. Mutat. Res. 65: 133-226, 1979. 55. Hooper, K., L. S. Gold, and B.N. Ames. The carcinogenic potency of ethylene dichloride in two animal bioassays: comparison of inhalation and gavage studies, pp. 65-81. In 8anbury Report 5. Ethylene Dichioride: A Potential Health Risk? New York: Co ld Spr ing Harbor Laboratory, 1980. 56. Horn, L. J. Kaldor, and J. McCann. ~ comparison of alternative measures of mutagenic potency in the Salmonella (Ames) test. Mutat. Res. 109 :131-141, 1983. Huberman, E. Mutagenesis and cell transformation of mammal fan cells in culture by chemical carcinogens. J. Environ. Path. Toxicol . 2: 29-42, 1978. 58. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARO Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Supplement 4. Lyon, France: Inter~ na~ciona1 Agency for Research on Cancer, 1982. 32

59 ~ International Commission for Protection against Environ- mental Mutagens and Carcinogens, Committee 2. Final report: Mutagenesis testing as an approach to carcino- genesis testing. Mutat. Res. 99: 73-91, 1982. 60. Jones , C.A., P.J. Marlino, W. Lijinsky, and E. Huberman. The relationship between the carcinogenicity and muta- genicity of nitrosamines in a hepatocy~ce mediated muta- genicity assay. Carcinogenesis 2:1075-1077, 1981. 61. Klein, G. Lymphoma development in mice and humans: Diversity of initiation is followed by convergent carton genetic evolution. Proc . Nat 1. Acad . Sci . U. S .A. 76: 2442-2446, 1979. 62. Klein, G. The role of gene dosage and genetic trans- positions in carcinogenesis. Nature 294: 313-318, 1981. 63. Knudson, A.G. Genetics and the etiology of human cancer. Adv. Hum. Genet . 1: I-51, 1977. 64. Knudson, A.G., A.T. Meadows, and W.W. Nichols. Chromo- somal deletion and retinoblastoma. N. Eng. J. Med. 295:1120-1123, 1976. 65. Kopelovich, L. Genetic predisposition to cancer in man: In vitro studies. Internatl. Rev. Cytol. 77 :63-88, 1982. 66. Kraemer, K.H. Xeroderma pigmentosum, pp. I-33. In D. J. Demis and J. McGuire, Ede. Clinical Dermatology. Vol. 4. Unit 19-7. New York: Harper and Row, 1980. 67. Magee, P.N. The relationship between mutagenesis, carci- nogenesis and teratogenesis, pp. 15-27. In D. Scott, B.A. Bridges, and F.H. Sobels, Eds. Progress in Genetic Toxi- cology. New York: Elsevier/North Holland, 1977. 68. Margolin, B.H., N. Kaplan, and E. Zeiger. Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:3779-3783, 1981. 69. Marx, J.L. Do tumor promoters affect DNA after all? Science 219:158-159, 1983. 70. McCann, J. Short-term tests and cancer policy, pp. 149- 161. In J.C. McDonald, Ed. Recent Advances in Occupa- tional Health. New York: Churchill Livingston, 1982. 71. McCann, J., and B.N. Ames. Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: Assay of 300 chemicals: Discussion. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73:950-954, 1976. - 72. McCann, J., and B.N. Ames. The Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity test: Predictive value for animal carcino- genicity, pp. 1431-1450. In H.H. Hiatt, 3.D. Watson, and J.A. Winsten, Ede. Origins of Herman Cancer. Human Risk Assessment. Book C. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Labora- tory, 1977. 73. McCann, J., E. Choi, E. Yamasaki, and B.N. Ames. Detection o f carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonel la/- microsome test: Assay of 300 chemicals. Proc. NatI. Acad Sci . U. S .A. 72: 5135-5139, 1975. 33

74. McCann, J., L. Born, G. Litton, J. Kaldor, R. ~lagaw, L. Bernstein, and M. Pike. Short-term tense for carcinogens and mutagens: A data base designed for comparative quan- titative analysis. In L. Goldberg, Ed. Structure Activity as a Predictive Tool in Toxicology. Fundamentals, Methods, and Applications. Washington, D.C: Hemisphere Pres ~ . (in pres s) 75. McCann, J., J. Raldor, L. Horn, and R. Siegel. Applica- tions of short-term tests to problems in cancer risk assessment: Potency, the Salmonella test, and inter species comparisons. In EPRI Workshop on Extrapolation from Animal Studies to Man. Proceedings of a Conference. Carme l, California. (in pres ~) 76. McKusick, V.A. Mendelian inheritance in man: Catalogs of autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked phenotypes. 5th ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1978. 975 pp. 7 7. Meselson, M., and K. Russell. Comparisons of carcinogenic and mutagenic potency, pp. 1473-1481. In H.H. Hiatt, J.D. Watson, and J.A. Winsten, Eds. Origins of Human Cancer. Human Ri ok Asses sment . Book C . New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1977. 78. Mohn, G. R. Bacterial systems for carcinogenicity testing. Mutat. Res. 87 :191-210, 1981. 79. Mohn, G.R., and J. Ellenberger. Appreciation of the value of different bacterial test systems for detecting and ranking chemical mutagens. Arch. Toxicol. 46:45-60, 1980. 80. Moolgavkar, S.H., and A.G. Knudson. Mutation and cancer: A model for human carcinogenesis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 66: 103 7-1052, 1981. 81. More speculation about oncogenes. Nature 300:213' 1982. 82 . Nagao , M., T. Sugimura , and T. Matsushima. Environmental mutagens and carcinogens. Ann. Rev. Genet. 12 :117-159, 1978. 83. Nat tonal Research Council, Committee for a Study on Saccharin and Food Safety Policy. Saccharin: Technical Assessment of Risks and Benefits. Part I. Saccharin and Its Impuritie ~ . Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1978. 248 pp. 84. National Research Council, Committee on Chemical Environmental Mutagens. Identifying and Estimating the Genetic Impact of Chemical Mutagens. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1933. 295 pp. 85. National Research Council, Environmental Studies Board. Achievements and problems in contemporary pest control, pp. 27-101. In Pest Control. An Assessment of Present and Al ternat ive Te chnologies . Vo ~ . I . Contemporary Pes t Con- trol Practices and Prospects. The Report of the Executive Committee. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sc fence a, 19 7 5 . 34

86. Nevers, P., and H. Saedler. Transposable genetic elements as agents of gene instability and chromosomal rearrange- mente. Nature 268: 109-115 ~ 1977. Parodi, S., and G. Brambilla. Relationships between mutation and transformation frequencies in mammalian cells "in vitro" witch chemical carcinogens. Mutat. Res. 47:53-74, 1977. B8. Parodi, S., S. De Flora, M. Cavanna, A. Pino, L. Robbiano, C. Bennicelli, and G. Brambilla. DNA-damaging activity in vivo and bacterial mutagenicity of sixteen hydras ine derivat ive s a ~ re lated quant itat ive ly t o the ir carcinogenicity. Cancer Res. 41 :1469-1482, 1981. 89. Parodi , S ., M. Taningher, P. Boero , and L. Santi . Quanti- tat ive correlations amongst alkaline DNA fragmentation, DNA covalent binding, mutagenicity in the Ames test and carcinogenicity, for 21 compounds. Mutat. Res. 93 :1-24, 1982. 90. Parry, J.M., Ed. The U.K.E.M.S. Genotoxicity Trial 1981. Mutat. Res. 100~-4~: I-447, 1982. 91. Payne, G. S., S.A. Courtneidge, L. B. Crittenden, A.M. Fadly, J.M. Bishop, and H.E. Varmus. Analysis of avian leukos is v irus DNA and RNA in bureal tumors: Viral gene expression is not required for maintenance of the tumor state. Cell 23:311-322, 1981. 92. Peto, J. Genetic predisposition to cancer, pp. 203-213. In J. Cairns, J.L. Lyon, and M. Skolnick, Eds. Cancer Inc idence in De f ined Populat ions . Banbury Report 4 a New York: Co ld Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1980. Poirier, L.A., and F.~. de Serres. Initial National Cancer Institute studies on mutagenesis as a prescreen for chemical carcinogens: An appraisal. J. NatI. Cancer Inst. 62: 919-926, 1979. 94. Poirier, L.A., and E.K. Weisburger. Selection of carcin~ yens and related compounds tested for mutagenic activity. J. Natl. Cancer Ins~c. 62 :833-840, 1979. 95. Prakash, K., O.W. McBride, D.C. Swan, S.G. Devare, S.R. Tronick, and S.A. Aaronson. Molecular c loning and chromo- somal mapping of a human locus related to the transform- ing gene of Moloney murine sarcoma virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79:5210-5214, 1982. Probst, G.S., R.E. McMahon, L.E. Hill, C.Z. Thompson, J. K . Epp, and S. B . Nea 1. Chemical I=induced 1lnscheduled DNA synthesis in primary rat hepatocyte cultures: ~ co~ parison with bacterial mutagenicity using 218 compounds. Environ. Mutagen. 3 :11-32, 1981. 97. Purchase, I.F.H. An appraisal of predictive test~ for c arc inogenicity. Mutat. Res. 99: 53-71, 1932. 98. Purchase. I.F.H. Inter-epecies comparisone of carcino~ genicity. Brit. J. Cancer 41:454-463, 1980. 35

99. Purchase, I.F.H., E. Longstaff, and J. Ashby. Evaluation of six short-term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens and recommendations for their use. Nature 264:624-627, 1976. 100. Purchase, I.F.ll., E. Longstaff, J. Ashby, J.A. Styles , D. Anderson, P.A. Lefevre, and F.R. Westwood. An evaluation of 6 short-term tests for detecting organic chemical car- cinogens. Brit. J. Cancer 37 :873-959, 1978. 10 1 . Re ddy , E. P ., R. K. Reynolds , E . Santos , and M. Barbac id . A point mutation is responsible for the acquisition of transforming properties by the T24 human bladder carci- noma oncogene. Nature 300 :149-152, 1982. 102. Rinkus, S.J., and M.S. Legator. Chemical characterization of 465 known or suspected carcinogens and their correla- tion with mutagenic activity in the Salmonella typhi- murium system. Cancer Res. 39: 3289-3318, 1979. 103. Rinkus, S.J., and M. S. Legator. Salmonella revisited: A reply to Ames and McCann. Cancer Res. 41: 4196-4203, 1981. 104. Rosenkranz, H.S., and L.A. Poirier. Evaluation of the mutagenicity and DNA~odifying activity of carcinogens and noncarcinogens in microbial systems. J. Natl. Cancer Inst . 62 :873-892, 1979. 105. Rubin, H. Is somatic mutation the major mechanism of ma 1 ignan t bans f ormat ion? J . Nat 1 . Cancer Ins t . 64: 995-1000, IgBo. 106. Sabin, A.B. Suppression of malignancy in human cancer cells: Issues and chat lenge s . Proc . Nat l . Acad . Sci . U. S.A. 78: 7129-7133, 1981. 107. Sawyer, C., R. Peto, L. Bernstein, and M.C. Pike. Calcu- lation of carcinogenic potency from lon~term animal carcinogenesis experiments. Biometrics. (in pres s) 108. Scribner, N.K., B. Woodworth, G.P. Ford, and J.D. Scribner. The influence of molecular size and partition coefficients on the predictability of tumor initiation in mouse skin from mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium. Care inogenesis 1 715-719, 1980. 109. Smith, R.J. NCI bioassays yield a trail of blunders. Science 204 :1287-1292, 19 79. 110. Spira, J., F. Wiener, S. Ohno, and G. Klein. Is erisomy cause or consequence of murine T cell leukemia develops meet? Studies on Roberteonian tranelocation in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.A. 76: 6619-6621, 1979. Ill. Squire, R.A. Human risk assessment from animal data, pp. 493-501. In S.K. Bandal, G.J. Marco, L. Golberg, and M.L. Leng, Eds. The Pesticide Chemist and Modern Toxicology. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 1981. 112. Squire, R.A. Ranking animal carcinogens: A proposed regulatory approach. Science 214: 877-880, 1981. 113. Stead, A.G., V. Hasselblad, J.P. Creason, and L. Claxton. Modeling the Ames test. Mutat. Res. 85: 13-27, 1981. 36

. 114. Straus, 1). S. Somatic mutation, cellular differentiation, and cancer causation. J . Nat 1. Cancer Inst . 67: 233-241, 1981. 115. Swan, D.C., O.W. McBride, K.C. Robbins, D.A. Keithiey, E.P. Reddy, and S .A. Aaronson. Chromosoma1 mapping of the simian sarcoma virus one gene analogue in human cells. Proc . Natl . Acad. Sci. U. S .A. 79 :4691-4695, 1982. 116. Tabin, C.J., S.M. Bradley, C.I. Bargmann, R.A. Weinberg, A.G. Papageorge, E.M. Scolnick, R. Dhar, D.R. Lowy, and E.H. Chang. Mechanism of activation of a human oncogene. Nature 300: 143-149, 1982. 117. Venitt, S. Bacterial mutation as an indicator of carcin' genicity. Brit. Med. Bull. 36:57-62, 1980. 118. Venitt, S. (Coordinator). UKEMS collaborative genotax- icity trial: Bacterial mutation tests of 4-chloromethyl- biphenyl, 4-hydroxymethy~biphenyl and benzyl chloride: Analysis of data from 17 laboratories. Mutat. Res. 100:91-109, 1982. 119. Wiener, F., H. Babonits, J. Spira, U. Bregula, G. Klein, R.~. Merwin, R. Asof~ky, R. Lynes, and G. Haughton. Chromosome 15 trisomy in spontaneous and care inogen- induced murine lymphomas of B-cell origin. Int. J. Cancer 2 7: 51-5B, 1981. Zi=~ermann, F.K. Can we determine mutagenicity or only a mutagenic potential? Mutat . Res. 92: 3-7, 1982. 37

Quantitative Relationship Between Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potencies: A Feasibility Study Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $40.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!