Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 143
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
Fluid Replacement and Heat Stress, 1993
Pp. 143-160. Washington, D.C.
National Academy Press
12
Role of Osmolality and Plasma Volume During Rehydration in Humans
Hiroshi Nose, Gary W. Mack, Xiangrong Shi, and Ethan R. Nadel1
INTRODUCTION
Humans have a prolonged period of delayed rehydration after thermal dehydration. This phenomenon has been known as involuntary dehydration since 1974 (Rothstein et al., 1947), and a number of studies have been conducted to better understand its cause (Greenleaf and Sargent, 1965; Greenleaf et al., 1983; Mack et al., 1986). Dill et al. (1933) suggested that thirst is primarily a function of the sodium chloride concentration in plasma rather than plasma volume. Greenleaf (1982) stated that two factors unique to humans contribute to the involuntary dehydration: excessive extracellular fluid loss due to Na+ loss into sweat and the upright posture. Recently, Morimoto et al. (1981b) found that the degree of involuntary dehydration in humans was reduced when a glucose-electrolyte solution rather than water was ingested during thermal dehydration. However, their results may have
1
Hiroshi Nose, Foundation Laboratory and Departments of Epidemiology and Public Health and Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519
OCR for page 144
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
been biased by the presence of glucose in their rehydration solution because taste of glucose-electrolyte solution may have influenced drinking behavior. More recently, Nose et al. (1985, 1986) demonstrated that the degree of involuntary dehydration was reduced in rats supplied with water containing 0.45 or 0.9% NaCl to compensate for the loss of electrolytes during thermal dehydration phenomenon.
There has been other evidence demonstrating the importance of the plasma volume change in involuntary dehydration. Nose et al. (1986) reported that in rats 17-20% of the ingested water remained in the vascular space, which is twice as much as expected, assuming that ingested fluid is distributed proportionally among the body compartments. These results also suggested to us that the high retention of ingested fluid in the vascular space might diminish volume-dependent dipsogenic stimulation despite the incomplete restoration of the total water deficit.
The purpose of this study was to assess the involuntary dehydration phenomenon in humans. We wished to examine the distribution and fate of the water ingested during rehydration to determine the mechanisms that contribute to the high retention of ingested fluids in the vascular space. Our hypothesis was that the disproportionately high recovery of plasma volume, with respect to total body water, contributes to the removal of the dipsogenic drive. Furthermore, removal of the osmotic stimulus accompanying plasma volume dilution limits the rate of body fluid restitution.
METHODS
Design
Six male volunteers were studied. Their physical characteristics are shown in Table 12-1. With a few exceptions, to be described below, the procedures and analytic techniques were the same as in the preceding chapter and as in Nose and colleagues (1988a). We induced a dehydration of 2.3% body weight by exposing subjects for 90-110 min to simultaneous heat [36°C, <30% relative humidity (rh)] and exercise (40% maximal aerobic power) stress in the seated position.
OCR for page 145
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
Table 12-1 Characteristics of Subjects (n = 6)
Age (years)
Wt (kg)
a (ml.kg−1 min−1)
Blood Volume (ml/kg)
Plasma Volume (ml/kg)
Mean
28.3
68.3
51.8
82.1
47.4
Range
23-33
56.5-83.7
36.4-62.9
61.0-102.3
33.5-61.4
a maximum aerobic power.
After dehydration, a 60-min recovery without fluid was imposed to allow the body fluid compartments to stabilize. Recovery was in a thermoneutral environment (28°C, <30% rh) and subjects were in the seated position throughout. A butterfly catheter was inserted into a superficial forearm vein within 10 min of the termination of exercise. Blood samples were taken directly after catheter placement and at 30 and 60 min of recovery. There were no differences in plasma osmolality (Posmol) or plasma volume between 30 and 60 min after the termination of exercise, thereby confirming that a new steady state had been achieved.
During the next 180 min, subjects rehydrated with water plus capsules ad libitum. Two series of rehydration experiments were performed on each subject: (1) with tap water (H2O-R) and (2) with 0.45% NaCl solution (Na-R). Subjects were given a capsule containing either 0.2 g sucrose/100 ml water during H2O-R or 0.45 g NaCl/100 ml water during Na-R. Water temperature was approximately 15°C. The minimum allowable drinking volume at a time was 100 ml because subjects were expected to take one capsule per 100 ml. Sodium and potassium concentrations in tap water were undetectable by flame photometry and the osmotic activity of the sucrose solution was approximately 4% of the 0.45% NaCl solution so that the gain of osmotically active substances in H2O-R was ignored. Ingestion of salt in capsule form was necessary to avoid any influence of taste on drinking behavior.
Blood samples were taken at 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min of the rehydration period, and urine was collected at 60, 120, and 180 min of rehydration.
Measurements
From each blood sample we determined Posmol (freezing point depression, model 3DII, Advanced Instruments) and plasma electrolytes
OCR for page 146
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
([Na+] and [K+], flame photometry, Instrumentation Laboratory model 433; [Cl−] Cotlove chloride titrator). These were expressed in meq/kg H2O after correction for plasma solids. We also measured microhematocrit, hemoglobin concentration (cyanomethemoglobin), plasma protein concentration (refractometry), and plasma solid concentration (dry weight method).
Calculations
Total water loss due to dehydration was estimated from body weight loss. Net fluid gain was calculated by subtracting total urine loss from water intake, assuming that respiratory water loss and sweat loss at rest were negligible. Electrolyte losses in sweat and urine due to dehydration were calculated by multiplying the volume of water loss by the concentration of each fluid, respectively (see Nose et al., 1988a). Net electrolyte gain was calculated by subtracting electrolyte loss in urine from electrolyte intake. The change in plasma volume (ΔPV) during an experiment was calculated from changes in hematocrit and hemoglobin concentrations (Elkinton et al., 1946). The change in extracellular fluid (ΔECF) space after 180 min of rehydration was determined by Cl− distribution, assuming that Cl− is equally distributed throughout the ECF space (Nose et al., 1985).
ΔCl−ECF = Cl−In − Cl−U − Cl−S
ΔCl−ECF = ΔCl−ISF + ΔCl−Pl
ΔISF = 1/1.05 × ΔCl−ISF/ΔCl−Pl × ΔPV
ΔECF = ΔPV + ΔISF
ΔICF = ΔTW − ΔECF
where ICF denotes intracellular fluid space, ISF denotes interstitial fluid space, TW indicates total body water, and subscripts Pl, ISF, ECF, In, U, and S indicate plasma, interstitial and extracellular fluid spaces, intake, urine, and sweat, respectively.
Statistics
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures was used to determine differences between H2O-R and Na-R, with significant differences between the two groups at various times determined with Tukey's minimum significant difference (MSD) test (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981). Specific trend analysis for each treatment was performed with a one-way ANOVA for repeated measures with significant differences between each time also determined with Tukey's MSD test. The null hypothesis was rejected when
OCR for page 147
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
P < 0.05. Regression formulas were calculated by Brace's method (Brace, 1977). All values are reported as means ± standard errors of six subjects.
RESULTS
The total body water deficits immediately before rehydration in the two conditions (H2O-R and Na-R) were 23.7 ± 0.9 and 21.7 ±1.0 ml/kg body weight. Since the difference in deficit between the two conditions was not significant, the data were pooled and the body water loss during dehydration therefore averaged 22.7 ± 0.7 ml/kg body wt (n = 12).
Figure 12-1 shows the cumulative amounts of fluid intake, urine output, and net fluid gain during rehydration. The cumulative fluid intake increased sharply for the first 30 min in both recovery conditions and then slowly
FIGURE 12-1 Cumulative amount of fluid intake, urine volume, and net fluid gain during 180 min of rehydration. Values are means ± SE of 6 subjects. ▪, Body water loss as difference from prerehydration. ∘ and ∙, Tap water (H2O-R) vs. NaCl Na-R recovery conditions, respectively. * H2O-R vs Na-R (P < 0.05); + 60 vs 120 and 180 min (P < 0.05).
OCR for page 148
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
increased to 16.1 ± 2.9 ml/kg body wt in H2O-R and 17.8 ± 2.8 ml/kg body wt in Na-R after 180 min of rehydration. By 180 min the cumulative fluid intake for Na-R was significantly greater than for H2O-R. Urine volume tended to be greater during H2O-R than Na-R, but this difference was not statistically significant. When the urine volumes are taken into account, the net fluid gain at 180 min was 15.3 ± 2.4 ml/kg body wt in Na-R and 12.1 ± 1.6 ml/kg body wt in H2O-R. The difference in net fluid gain was significant at 120 and 180 min. Net fluid gain during Na-R increased significantly between 60 and 180 min, whereas net fluid gain during H2O-R showed no significant increase after 60 min.
Figure 12-2 shows the changes in hematocrit (ΔHct), hemoglobin concentration (ΔHb), and plasma solids during rehydration. After 60 min of rest without fluids after dehydration, Hct, Hb, and plasma solids were increased significantly. These variables returned to control relatively slowly XXX
FIGURE 12-2 Changes in hematocrit (ΔHct), hemoglobin (ΔHb), and plasma (ΔPl) solids shown as differences from control values (C). Symbols and other abbreviations as in Figure 12-1. ψ indicates values that are different from control. (P < 0.05)
OCR for page 149
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
during H2O-R; Hct was restored after 30 min of rehydration and Hb and plasma solids were restored after 120 min of rehydration. On the other hand, these variables returned to the control levels more rapidly during Na-R than during H2O-R, with significant differences being maintained between the two rehydration conditions throughout the 180 min. During Na-R, Hct fell significantly below the control values after 120 min. Changes in plasma protein concentration were almost identical to changes in plasma solids. Total protein content, calculated from plasma protein concentration and PV, was 3.4 ± 0.2 g/kg before dehydration in both groups, and, at 180 min of rehydration, 3.4 ± 0.3 g/kg and 3.5 ± 0.2 g/kg in H2O-R and Na-R, respectively.
Figure 12-3 shows the changes in plasma electrolytes during rehydration. During Na-R, plasma electrolytes tended to decrease, but Posmol remained significantly above the control concentration until 120 min of rehydration, [Na+] until 60 min, [K+] until 30 min, and [Cl−] until 10 min. On the other
FIGURE 12-3 Osmolality (Posmol) and Na+, K+, and Cl− concentrations in plasma during rehydration. Symbols and other abbreviations as in Figure 12-1 and Figure 12-2.
OCR for page 150
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
hand, plasma electrolytes decreased significantly at the beginning of H2O-R, and significant differences between the two conditions were maintained for Posmol and [Na+] throughout the rehydration period. No significant differences in [K+] occurred between the two conditions throughout the rehydration period.
Figure 12-4 shows the changes in plasma volume from predehydration values. After dehydration, the PV deficit was 2.28 ± 0.51 and 2.14 ± 0.60 ml/kg body wt in the H2O-R and Na-R experimental conditions, respectively. During H2O-R, PV increased slowly but remained significantly lower than the control PV until 60 min. PV restoration was faster during Na-R and returned to the control level by 20 min. By 180 min of rehydration, the changes in PV with respect to control were −0.5 ± 0.8 and 1.58 ± 0.63 ml/kg body wt in H2O-R and Na-R, respectively.
Free water clearance () was significantly increased (less negative) during H2O-R but decreased slightly (more negative) in Na-R (Table 12-2). These differences in , between the recovery conditions were significant. In addition, the loss of osmotically active substances and osmotic clearance (C osmol) was greater in Na-R than in H2O-R (Table 12-2).
FIGURE 12-4 Changes in plasma volume (ΔPV) shown as differences from control values. Symbols and abbreviations as in Fig. 12-1 and Fig. 12-2.
OCR for page 151
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
Table 12-2 Renal Function After Dehydration and Rehydration
Dehydration
Rehydration, min
60
120
180
Urine flow, µl · kg−1 · min−1
H2O-R
9.7 ± 1.6
8.9 ± 0.9
21.0 ± 11.4
25.9 ± 17.2
Na-R
9.0 ± 1.2
8.4 ± 1.3
11.5 ± 2.8
12.1 ± 3.5
[Osmol]U × urine flow, µosmol kg−1min−1
H2O-R
7.9 ± 0.9
8.6 ± 0.9
8.2 ± 1.0
7.1 ± 0.7
Na-R
7.5 ± 0.5
7.5 ± 0.5
9.3 ± 1.3
9.3 ± 1.0*
Cosmol, µl · kg−1 · min−1
H2O-R
27.5 ± 3.0
29.9 ± 3.2
28.7 ± 3.5
25.3 ± 2.6
Na-R
25.9 ± 1.7
26.1 ± 1.8
32.4 ± 4.4
33.3 ± 3.0*
, µl · kg−1· min−1
H2O-R
−17.8 ± 2.2
−21.0 ± 2.4
−7.7 ± 11.1
0.6 ± 16.2
Na-R
−16.9 ± 1.2
−17.7 ± 1.3
−21.0 ± 4.2*
−21.7 ± 3.8*
Values are means ± SE. H2O-R and Na-R, rehydration conditions with tap water and 0.45% NaCl solution, respectively; [osmol]U, urine osmolality; Cosmol, osmotic clearance; , free water clearance. *Significant differences between H2O-R and Na-R groups (P < 0.05).
Table 12-3 Electrolyte Balance After Dehydration and at 180 min of Rehydration
Dehydration
Rehydration
H2O-R
Na-R
H2O-R
Na-R
Na+ loss
−1.01 ± 0.15
−1.18 ± 0.12
−1.28 ± 0.17
−1.48 ± 0.13*
K+ loss
−0.31 ± 0.03
−0.31 ± 0.03
−0.54 ± 0.05
0.58 ± 0.03*
Cl− loss
−0.95 ± 0.11
−1.09 ± 0.14
−1.28 ± 0.12
−1.53 ± 0.03*
Na+ intake
+1.40 ± 0.22
Cation balance
−1.32 ± 0.15
−1.49 ± 0.13
−1.81 ± 0.17
−0.66 ± 0.14
Values are means ± S.E. in meq/kg body wt. H2O-R and Na-R, rehydration conditions with tap water and 0.45% NaCl solution, respectively. *Significant differences between H2O-R and Na-R (P < 0.05).
During Na-R, subjects consumed 119% of the Na+ lost during dehydration, whereas during H2O-R they consumed no electrolytes. Because of the K+ and Na+ losses in urine during rehydration, the net cation balance at the
OCR for page 152
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
end of the rehydration period was −0.66 meq/kg body wt in Na-R, whereas it was −1.81 meq/kg body wt in H2O-R (Table 12-3).
Fluid and electrolyte balances during rehydration are summarized in Figure 12-5. The means are plotted with standard error bars at 60-min intervals from the dehydrated condition (0 min) to rehydrated conditions (60, 120, and 180 min) in both groups. The intersection of the x- and y-axes represents the predehydrated condition (control) and the solid line indicates the isotonic line, y = 0.15x. The area above the isotonic line reflects hypertonic body fluids, and the area below the line represents hypotonic body fluids. In both recovery conditions, H2O-R and Na-R, fluid and electrolyte balance moved toward the theoretical isotonic line. Only in H2O-R did the fluid balance reach the isotonic line. The degree of involuntary dehydration after 180 min of drinking was primarily determined by the cation deficit.
FIGURE 12-5 Recoveries of fluid and electrolyte balance during rehydration. Means of 6 subjects are shown with SE bars of 60-min intervals during rehydration. The theoretical isotonic line is y = 0.15x. * Points significantly different from isotonic line (P < 0.05). Abbreviations as in Figure 12-1.
OCR for page 153
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
Changes in the body fluid compartments after dehydration and 180 min of rehydration are summarized in Figure 12-6. The values are shown as differences from the predehydration values. After dehydration and after the 60-min period of body fluid stabilization, change in total body water (ΔTW), change in intracellular fluid space (ΔICF), ΔECF, and ΔPV were −2.2 ± 0.7, −10.2 ± 1.0, −12.6 ± 0.8, and −2.2 ± 0.4 ml/kg body wt, respectively.
FIGURE 12-6 Changes of fluid compartments shown as differences from control values. Values are means ± SE of 12 subjects in dehydration and 6 subjects in each recovery condition at 180 min of rehydration. All recovery values are significantly different from dehydration values (P < 0.05) * Tap water (H2O-R) vs. NaCl (Na-R) recovery conditions (P < 0.05): ψ different from control (P < 0.05). ΔTW, change in total body water; ΔICF, change in intracellular fluid space; ΔECF, change in extracellular fluid space; ΔPV, change in plasma volume.
OCR for page 154
FLUID REPLACEMENT AND HEAT STRESS
After 180 min of rehydration the fluid deficits in all compartments were significantly reduced. The TW and ICF space were still significantly lower than predehydration values in both recovery conditions. The ECF space recovered in Na-R, whereas it did not in H2O-R. Significant differences between H2O-R and Na-R occurred in ΔTW, △ECF, and ΔPV (Figure 12-6).
Figure 12-7 shows the relationship between the recoveries in PV (rPV) and total body water (rTW) (top) and between the rPV and ECF space (rECF) after 180 min of rehydration (bottom). Values are shown as
FIGURE 12-7 Relationship between recoveries in plasma volume (rPV) and total body water (rTW) (top) and between recoveries in plasma volume (rPV) and extracellular fluid volume (rECF) (bottom) during rehydration with tap water (H2O-R) and 0.45% NaCl solution (Na-R). ----, Theoretically expected lines, constructed under the assumption that distribution of ingested fluid between two compartments is proportional to their initial volumes. Individual data at 180 min of rehydration are plotted as differences from prerehydration values, as are means ± SE of each group.
OCR for page 155
ÿþ F L U I D R E P L A C E M E N T A N D H E A T S T R E S S d i f f e r e n c e s f r o m t h e p r e h y d r a t i o n v a l u e s i n e a c h s u b j e c t , a n d t h e m e a n s o f e a c h g r o u p w i t h s t a n d a r d e r r o r b a r s a r e a l s o s h o w n . S i n c e t h e r e w e r e n o s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n t h e r e g r e s s i o n f o r m u l a s b e t w e e n t h e r e c o v e r y c o n d i t i o n s , a l l d a t a w e r e p o o l e d f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g a n a l y s i s . T h e r P V w a s c l o s e l y c o r r e l a t e d n o t o n l y w i t h t h e r T W ( y = 0 . 4 7 &