National Academies Press: OpenBook

Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists (1996)

Chapter: 3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES

« Previous: 2 WHAT IS TO BE SUSTAINED?
Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×

3

DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES

At first glance, sustainability and mineral resource development appear to be in conflict. Mining depletes finite resources and in a strict sense, therefore, is inherently unsustainable. For instance, there is only a finite amount of copper in the earth’s crust, and each unit of copper extracted increases the fraction of the total copper resource base that is in use. Thus, it can be argued that if we continue to mine we will eventually exhaust the available supply of minerals.

This perspective, however, ignores the dynamics of mineral supplies. In practice the non-renewable character of minerals may be less constraining than it might seem. Five factors make the benefits from mining much more sustainable than they initially appear to be. First, through the process of exploration and development, mining companies continually reinvigorate, augment, or “sustain” their reserves.2 Current reserves represent only a small portion of the mineral resources remaining in the earth’s crust. Exploration and development lead to the discovery and proving up of previously unknown mineral deposits and—perhaps just as important—additional reserves at existing mines and known deposits. Technological improvements in exploration increase the discovery rate of mineral deposits and at the same time reduce discovery costs. Predictive models for massive sulfide deposits, for example, allow targeting of completely buried deposits by using the combination of structural projections and favorable stratigraphic horizons in volcanic rocks.

2  

Reserves are minerals that are known to exist and can be produced at a profit with current technology under prevailing economic conditions.

Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×

Discovery of dozens of gold, copper, and uranium deposits over the last several decades amply demonstrate the rewards of technically sound exploration. Mineral exploration and mine development, in effect, create wealth (reserves) even as resources are extracted. Undiscovered mineral resources have little value until they are discovered and developed. But this optimistic picture must be tempered by the fact that there is increasing competition for the area available for exploration and reserve augmentation at least within the borders of the United States.

Second, technological change sustains mineral production. Technological improvements in mining and mineral processing reduce costs and permit profitable mineral production from previously uneconomic, mineralized rock. Minerals can be extracted from rock that otherwise would either remain in the ground or in waste piles and tailings. For example, the “micron” gold deposits in Nevada and Utah, which currently dominate U.S. gold production, rely on recovery technology that had not been perfected twenty-five years ago. The available evidence suggests that additions to reserves through discovery and technologic change have more than offset reductions through depletion of existing mines over the last several decades (Table 1).

Third, even when a mine is physically depleted, recycling can be thought of as an extension of primary mining. Recycling is, in fact, an important source of many metals (Table 2).

Fourth, a scarce resource can sometimes be replaced by a more abundant substance. For example, aluminum can replace copper in long distance transmission power lines.

Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×

Table 1. Estimated World Reserves of Selected Minerals and Metals, 1940s-1980s (million metric tons of contained metal, end of decade)1

 

1940s

1950s

1960s

1970s

1980s

Aluminum2

1,605

3,224

11,600

22,700

23,200

Copper

91

124

280

543

566

Lead

31-45

45-54

86

157

120

Zinc

54-70

77-86

106

240

295

Source: Crowson 1994, who compiled data from Minerals Handbook 1994-95.

Notes:

1. These data are crude estimates and they are subject to many uncertainties. Nevertheless they provide a picture of the effects of exploration and technological change on mineral reserves.

2. Gross weight of bauxite.

Table 2. Old Scrap Recovery1 as a Percent of U.S. Apparent Consumption of Selected Metals, 1960-1990 (percent)2

 

1960

1970

1980

1990

Aluminum

5

4

11

22

Copper

27

25

28

25

Iron and Steel

?

?

15-20

22

Lead

40

37

54

69

Zinc

6

5

6

9

Source: Combined from U.S. Bureau of Mines Minerals Yearbooks 1962-94.

Notes:

1. Old scrap recovery represents metal recovered from discarded and obsolete products that have reached the end of their useful lives.

2. Apparent consumption = U.S. primary metal production + secondary production from old scrap + imports - exports.

Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×

Fifth, and more broadly, even when a mine is physically depleted, its value may persist if an appropriate portion of the proceeds are invested in human capital (such as education or health care) or man-made physical capital (such as infrastructure or technology). Elaboration of this contentious point is beyond the scope of this report.

Challenges Concerning Depletion

Challenge #1: To develop a better scientific basis for discussions of the adequacy of mineral resources. An important need is to develop a better methodology for characterizing submarginal mineral resources—i.e., those that are not exploitable under current economic conditions with known technologies, but which could become economically feasible under different conditions. Another need is to understand the “mineralogical barrier”, the fact that mineral and metal resources occur not only in several distinct ranges of enrichment or concentration, but also in different chemical states. Recovery becomes dramatically more difficult (e.g., more energy intensive) as we move from one mineralogical type (e.g., sulfide minerals) to another (e.g., silicate minerals). Details on these concentration ranges are very incomplete, and hence we know little about this aspect of our mineral-resource inventory (see Skinner, 1976; Gorgon, et al., 1987).

Challenge #2: To develop better data on factors involved in mineral supply, that should be used in public-policy analysis and decision making. An important need is better data on annual changes in mineral reserves, both additions and reductions. A related need is better data on how the discovery and development of mineral resources occurs over time —for example, historical discovery rates and the factors that influence discovery rates, and information on where additional

Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×

reserves come from (i.e., the relative importance of discovery of previously unknown deposits, development of previously known but undeveloped deposits, extensions of existing mines, and adoption of better techniques of mining and mineral processing). These types of data are necessary inputs to ongoing efforts to incorporate resource depletion into the national income and product accounts (see National Research Council, 1994). By incorporating resource depletion and reserve additions into these accounts, we will have better measures of real economic growth and national wealth. Although we are a long way from having useful mineral accounts, the study by Carson (1994) and her colleagues at the U.S. Department of Commerce is an important initial step in establishing this type of approach to mineral resources.

Challenge #3: To better communicate to policymakers and the public the dynamic nature of mineral supply, thus putting the prospect of “running out ” in the proper context. Better science and data alone are not enough. The sustainability debate challenges earth scientists to communicate more clearly with policymakers and the public. Mineral reserves represent only a small portion of the mineral wealth of the earth’s crust. Reserves are like inventory—they are continually replenished from previously uneconomic or undiscovered mineralization. What should be of concern is not the limited extent of reserves, but rather the process by which reserves are replenished.

Challenge #4: To incorporate recycling and reuse into the concept of sustainability . Ultimately, recycling must play a major role in our use of metals, but we have much to learn about the problems and practices of recycling. This area needs research, ideas, and education.

Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×
Page 7
Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×
Page 8
Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×
Page 9
Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×
Page 10
Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×
Page 11
Suggested Citation:"3 DEPLETION OF MINERAL RESOURCES." National Research Council. 1996. Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9077.
×
Page 12
Next: 4 MINING AND THE ENVIROMENT »
Mineral Resources and Sustainability: Challenges for Earth Scientists Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!