Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Nutrient Requirements of Cats, Revised Edition, 1986 (1986)
Board on Agriculture (BOA)

Page
30
bottomleft bottomright
Page
30

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 30
Formulated Diets for Cats Cats require specific nutrients, not specific feedstuffs. Nevertheless, cats are quite individualistic in their feed- ing behavior and frequently exhibit food preferences that have been conditioned by previous dietary experi- ence. Conditioned diet preference should not be con- fused with nutrient requirements. While cats are car- nivorous in the wild, satisfactory diets containing significant amounts of vegetable matter have been de- veloped. However, in commercial cat diets a proportion of animal tissue is retained to satisfy specific nutrient requirements, e.g., arachidonic acid and taurine, and to improve the acceptability of the diet. Thus, strict veg- etarian diets fed alone are not nutritionally adequate for cats, even if such diets are sufficiently palatable to be readily eaten. The nutritional needs of domestic cats are increas- ingly being met by commercial cat foods. While there are a large number of products available, these fall into the three basic types described below. DRY-TYPE CAT FOODS Low in moisture content (usually about 7 to 12 per- cent), these foods commonly contain ground, whole or dehulled cereal grains (e.g., wheat, corn, oats, barley), cereal by-products (e.g., corn gluten meal, mill run, wheat germ meal), soybean products (e.g., soybean meal, soy flour, soy protein concentrate), animal prod- ucts (e.g., poultry by-product meal, meat meal, and meat and bone meal, meat by-products), marine prod- fied fat on an extruded product or incorporating fat into the core material. Crude protein content varies from 28 to 36 percent on a dry basis. Processing methods (fre- quently expansion, extrusion, or baking) serve to par- tially gelatinize starch for improved digestibility. The extruded product is often sprayed with various protein digests to increase product acceptability. SEMIMOIST CAT FOODS Intermediate in moisture content (usually 25 to 35 percent), these foods incorporate a level of water-solu- ble solids such as sugar, sodium chloride, sorbates, and low-molecular-weight alcohols (e.g., propylene glycol) sufficient to stabilize the product through available wa- ter control and to prevent spoilage without refrigera- tion. Semimoist cat foods commonly contain fresh or frozen meats (e.g., liver, kidney, tripe), animal by- product meals (e.g., meat, poultry, liver), whole or de- hulled cereal grains (e.g., corn, wheat, barley, oats), cereal by-products (e. g., corn gluten meal, wheat flour), marine products (e.g., fish meal, condensed fish solubles), soybean products (e.g., soybean meal, soy flour, soy protein concentrate), fats and oils (e.g., ani- mal fat), and mineral and vitamin supplements. Crude protein content usually ranges from 28 to 40 percent and crude fat from 10 to 15 percent on a dry basis. These foods are commonly marketed in a sealed pouch of a size convenient for feeding single meals. ucts (e.g., fish meal, condensed fish solubles), milk products (e.g., dried whey, dried skimmed milk, so- CANNED CAT FO ODS drum case~nate), fats and oils (e. g., cod liver oil, animal fat), and mineral and vitamin supplements. Crude fat content usually ranges from 8 to 12 percent on a dry basis. These fat levels are achieved by spraying a liqui- 30 Relatively high in moisture content (usually 72 to 78 percent in the United States), these foods are usually for- mulated to be nutritionally complete. They may also

OCR for page 31
Nutnent Requirements of Cats 31 serve as a highly palatable, specialty food that adds vari- ety to the cat's diet but which may not be nutritionally complete. The label should be examined for guarantees of nutritional adequacy. Complete foods usually have crude protein levels ranging from 28 to 50 percent and crude fat levels from 10 to 40 percent on dry basis. They are commonly formulated from fresh or frozen meats (e.g., lung, liver, kidney, spleens, tripe, uclders, bone, blood, poultry by-products), animal by-product meals (meat, poultry), marine products (e.g., fish, fish meals), and mineral and vitamin supplements. Some formula- tions also contain whole or dehullec] cereal grains (e.g., corn, wheat, barley), soybean products (e.g., textured soy protein derived from soy flour or soy protein con- centrate3, fats and oils (e.g., vegetable oil), and cereal by-products (e.g., wheat bran). Specialty canned for- mulations are generally high-protein (40 to 65 percent) meat- or fish-based products with mineral or vitamin supplements added. In all canned cat foods particular attention is needed to ensure that adequate thiamin lev- els are present post-processing, because thiamin is espe- cially heat labile and up to 80 percent may be lost during canning. Cannel] cat foods should be supplemented to several times the thiamin requirement to ensure ade- quacy after processing. NUTRIENT CONTENT OF COMMERCIAL DIETS Metabolism trials have been conducted on commer- cial cat diets (M. A. Norvell, Quaker Oats Company, personal communications, 1976; Kendall et al., 1982a,b, 1985~. The proximate composition, apparent digestibility, and metabolizability of the various types of commercial cat diets are shown in Table 3. The aver- age apparent digestibilities of crude protein, crude fat, and nitrogen-free extract were appreciably less (78, 75, and 72 percent, respectively) than the digestibility fig- ures (91, 96, and 96 percent, respectively) used in devel- oping Atwater's (Harris, 1966) estimated ME values of 4, 9, and 4 kcal/g. Table 3 also outlines calculated me- tabolizable energy (CME) values by diet type according to four different methods (OMEN to CME4~. Method 1 (CME~) calculates ME on the basis of Atwater factors; method 2 (CME2) uses measured apparent digestibility coefficients to adjust E values to an estimated ME; method 3 (CME3) uses the regression equations derived by Kendall et al. (1982a,b) to calculate ME of dry and canned diets; method 4 (CME4) adjusts measured in viva DE values to ME by subtracting 0.9 kcal/g digest- ible crude protein in the diet, which is the E value of urinary urea. The latter value does not include the en- ergy from components in urine that are not associated with the complete catabolism of protein. However, the 0.9 kcal/g digestible crude protein has been verified ex- perimentally in cat metabolism trials (P. T. Kendall, Pedigree Petfoods, personal communication, 1986~. The footnotes to Table 3 explain the derivation of CME~ to CME4 values in detail. Kendall et al. (1985) compared these four methods of estimating ME content of cat diets with in viva deter- mined ME values. The exception was that an adjust- ment factor of 1.25 kcal/g digestible crude protein was used for CME4 rather than 0.9 kcal/g digestible crude protein reported in Table 3: Prediction of ME Linear Regression from Equation Coeffi- cient of Deter- mination (R2) 0.96 Residual Standard Deviation (RSD) Atwater factors(CMEI)~ ME = 0.09 + 0.76CMEIb Measured apparent digestibility coefficients and E values (CME2) Regression equations (CME3) (a) dry diets (b) canned DE by subtracting 1.25 keel digestible crude protein (CME4) 0.214 ME = 0.09 ~ 0.93 CME2 0.96 0.228 ME = 0.47 + 0.84 CME3 0.78 0.149 ME = 0.02 + 0.96 CME3 0.95 0.049 ME = 0.01 + 1.02 CME4 1.00 0.04 . aSubscripts refer to the venous methods. bIn viva determined ME (keal/g, as fed). All methods, except CME3 for dry diets, reliably esti- mated relative ME values of cat diets, but absolute ME was overestimated by methods 1 and 3 (dry diets only) and to a lesser extent by method 2. Method 3 gives close agreement with in viva ME of canned diets, while method 4 closely agrees with in viva ME for all diets and would be further improved by the use of 0.9 kcal/g di- gestible crude protein rather than 1.25 kcal/g. Thus, an accurate estimate of in viva ME content of commercial cat diets can be obtained by adjustment of DE values by subtracting an assumed energy value for urinary urea (CME4), or by applying apparent digestibility coeffi- cients and E values for major organic nutrients (CME2~. In addition, the ME of certain canned diets can be pre- dicted from proximate composition according to the multiple regression equation of Kendall et al. (1982~. However, no single method appears to be applicable for cat diets of all types unless preceded by in viva digestibil- ity studies. The use of Atwater factors is not recom- mended unless apparent digestibility values above 90 percent are measured for crude protein, fat, and nitro- gen-free extract. Estimates of daily food requirements for cats are pre- sented in Table 4. These estimates take into consider-

OCR for page 32
32 Nutrient Requirements of Cats ation the recommended daily ME allowances per kilo- gram body weight in Table 1 for the range of body weights in Figure 1. The E concentrations used for the dry matter in dry-type, semimoist, and canned cat foods were 3.2, 4.1, and 4.0 kcal/g, respectively. As fed these values would be 2.9, 3.0, and 1.1 kcal/g, respectively. Specific calculations should be made for cat foods with different composition. It should be emphasized, how- ever, that these estimates are just guides, and a healthy cat will normally regulate energy intake in relation to its needs provided palatable food is available. GUIDELINES FOR FORMULATING DIETS FROM NATURAL INGREDIENTS Diets based upon natural ingredients often have nu- trient bioavailabilities less than that found in purified diets. Intact proteins require enzymic digestion in the gut, B vitamins must be released from their bound forms, and both of these groups of nutrients may not be completely hydrolyzed from all natural feedstuffs. Trace elements may be rendered poorly available be- cause of binding to phytate or fiber. While nutrient re- quirements listed in Table 2 are appropriate for purified feline diets, formulated diets from natural ingredients require adjustment factors to assure nutrient adequacy. Guidelines discusser] below are intended to bridge the gap between minimum nutrient concentrations in puri- fied diets and those thought necessary for typical com- mercial diets. The factors suggested have generally been derived from studies on species other than the cat. Ad- justment of some of these factors may be necessary at a later date when bioavailability data become available for the cat. Protein Amino Acids Protein digestibility and hence amino acid bioavaila- bilities generally will not exceed 90 percent for natural ingredients commonly used in cat foods. Some pro- teineacous ingredients, however, may be no more than 50 percent digestible, particularly those rich in collagen protein (Baker and Parsons, 1985~. Moreover, excessive heat processing procedures sometimes used in preparing commercial products may enhance or lower amino acid bioavailability. Considering the array of ingredients used in typical feline diets, some of which are high and some low in digestibility, an average correction factor of 1.3 is suggested. Thus, the total minimum concentra- tions of each essential amino acid necessary in a practi- cal-type diet can be estimated by multiplying the puri- fied diet requirement in Table 2 by 1.3. Vitamins Little information is available on the bioavailability of fat-soluble vitamins. Requirements listed in Table 2 are expressed on the basis of a specific form of each fat- soluble vitamin, i.e., retinal, cholecalciferol, cY-to- copherol, and phyIloquinone. Other forms or isomers may be present in natural ingredients and may, in turn, contribute vitamin bioactivity to the cat. Information concerning this can be found in the text, but if more specific and detailed information is desired, other refer- ences should be consulted. Vitamin E deserves special mention when dealing with diets based upon natural ingredients. Diets con- taining a high level of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA, e.g., in fish oil) may lead to a three- to four-fold increase in the vitamin E requirement. Diets low in PUFA and containing supplemental selenium and/or antioxidant, on the other hand, may not necessitate the 30 mg/kg cz-tocophero} activity listed in Table 2. Based upon the available information at this time and the high digestibility of triglycerides, it would appear that, with the exception of vitamin E for diets high in PUFA, the levels of fat-soluble vitamin activity listed in Table 2 are suitable for both purified and practical-type diets. B vitamins exist both in bound and free forms. Thus, they are not always completely available when con- sumed by animals. Niacin and folacin are examples of two B vitamins that are poorly available. Intestinal B-vitamin biosynthesis likely furnishes some bioavailable B-vitamin activity to cats, although information does not exist in cats to quantify the extent of this contribution. Unlike clogs, rabbits, and rodents, however, cats engage in minimal coprophagy, and therefore they would be expected to derive less B-vita- min activity from intestinal synthesis than would occur for the other species mentioned. Work done with other species suggests that a general bioavailability correction factor of 1.6 should be ap- plied to the B-vitamin requirements listed in Table 2 when extrapolating them to animals consuming practi- cal-type diets (e.g., Molitoris and Baker, 1976; Yen et al., 1976; Anderson et al., 1978; Southern and Baker, 1981~. Thiamin is a special case, however, because it is extremely heat labile. Thus, while multiplying require- ment values in Table 2 by 1.6 will likely suffice for prac- tical-diet B vitamins in general, the reader is referred to pages 24 and 31 for special precautions concerning thiamin. Minerals Other than phosphorus, little definitive information exists on the bioavailability of essential macro-elements.

OCR for page 33
Nutnent Requirements of Cats 33 Feline diets are generally high in phosphorus, ant] a ma- jority of that present exists as meat- or bone-derived phosphorus, which, relative to CaHPO4 (an accepted standard), is close to 100 percent bioavailable. Plant- derived phosphorus, on the other hand, is largely bound to phytate and as such should be considered no more than 30 percent bioavailable. Because of this, dry cat foods for kittens during the first 4 weeks postweaning may require up to 8 g total phosphorus per kilogram of dry diet. Other than this adjustment, requirements for the other macro-elements (Ca, Mg, K, Na, CI) listed in Table 2 may be applied to both purified and practical- type diets. Essential trace elements contained in natural ingredi- ents are not fully bioavailable to the animals consuming them. Unfortunately, few data exist to quantify their bioavailability in cats. Evidence with other species, however, suggests that both phytate and fiber can bind trace elements and thereby render them less available. Phytate binding of trace elements is, moreover, en- hanced by excess dietary calcium. The binding constant for zinc is particularly high such that the minimal re- quirement for zinc may be up to 4 times higher when determined with a soy-based diet than with a casein- based cliet. The zinc requirement listed in Table 2 was set on the assumption that a soy-protein purified diet was fed. Factors other than phytate and fiber can affect trace- element bioavailability. Thus, recent evidence with chicks has shown that a feed ingredient like menhaden fish meal possesses mineral unavailability factors (Halpin and Baker, 1986~. Fish meals are assumed to contain neither phytate nor fiber, but contain measur- able levels of neutral detergent fiber, probably mostly chitin and chitin-like materials (D. H. Baker, University of Illinois, personal communication, 19861. Whether animal products other than fish contain factors reducing trace-element availability is unknown. The difficulty in assigning guidelines for extrapolat- ing trace-element requirements from purified diets to practical diets is multifaceted. Not only may trace ele- ments be less available in diets based upon natural ingre- dients than in those based upon purified ingredients, but factors present in the natural ingredients may further lower the bioavailability of inorganic sources of the trace elements. Moreover, mineral-mineral interactions can come into play. Classic examples of these are excess dietary phosphorus lowering iron bioavailability and excess dietary zinc lowering the bioavailability of both iron and copper. A low ratio of dietary inorganic cat- ions relative to anions may result in excessive spillage of cations (e.g., K) in the urine. For example, high-protein diets, perhaps by virtue of sulfate production and excre- tion in the urine, increase the potassium requirement of cats (Hills et al., 1982~. This phenomenon was taken into consideration, however, in setting the minimal po- tassium requirement for growth of the kitten. It seems clear that mineral additions to a diet cannot be made indiscriminantly. The kind of dietary (organic) ingredi- ents, the source of each inorganic mineral supplement, and mineral-mineral interactions must all be considered carefully before fortifying practical-type diets with sources of mineral elements. To provide a margin of safety to protect against unavailability factors present in diets based upon natural ingredients, an adjustment fac- tor of 1.3 is suggested for iron, copper, and iodine. * A correction factor of 1.5 is suggested for zinc and manga- nese. Selenium probably requires no correction, because food-borne selenium exists primarily as seleno- methionine whose selenium moiety is essentially totally available relative to sodium selenate or sodium selenite. *Some colorants, e.g., erythrosin, contain considerable quantities of iodine which is wholly unavailable and yet analytically shows abun- dant iodine.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

natural ingredients