Questions? Call 888-624-8373

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Effects of Double-Hull Requirements on Oil Spill Prevention: Interim Report (1996)
Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems (CETS)

Page
XI
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


EFFECTS OF DOUBLE-HULL REQUIREMENTS ON OIL SPILL PREVENTION: Interim Report

Contents

Page
XI

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page R11
EFFECTS OF DOUBLE-HULL REQUIREMENTS ON OIL SPILL PREVENTION: Interim Report Contents     EXECUTIVE SUMMARY   1  1   INTRODUCTION   3      Oil Pollution Act of 1990,   3      Factors Affecting Ship Safety and Pollution Prevention,   8  2   SHIP SAFETY AND PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT   14      Trends in Oil Spills,   15      Oil Outflow from Double-Hull Tankers,   16      Measures for Reducing Outflow from Single-Hull Tankers,   17      Fleet Safety,   18      Findings,   19  3   ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF THE MARITIME OIL TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY   20      Forecast of Tanker Fleet,   21      New-Building Requirements and Market Capability,   23      Cost Data,   24      Required Freight Rate Analysis,   25      Jones Act Tankers and Barges,   26      Findings,   26

OCR for page R12
EFFECTS OF DOUBLE-HULL REQUIREMENTS ON OIL SPILL PREVENTION: Interim Report  4   OPERATIONAL MAKEUP OF THE MARITIME OIL TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY   28      Ownership, 1990 versus 1994,   29      Use of Lightering and Offshore Ports, 1990 versus 1994,   29      Patterns of Vessel Sales, Transfer, and Scrapping,   31      Findings,   32  5   DATA ON THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERATION OF DOUBLE-HULL VESSELS   33      Problems and Concerns,   34      Design and Construction,   37      Inspection and Maintenance,   38      Operational Concerns,   39      Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Single-Hull and Double-Hull Designs,   40      Surveys to be Conducted and Evaluated,   40      Findings,   41     REFERENCES   43     ACRONYMS   45     APPENDICES       A Biographies of Committee Members   49     B Questionnaires   54     C Presentations to the Committee   59     D Information Sources   60     BIBLIOGRAPHY   61

OCR for page R13
EFFECTS OF DOUBLE-HULL REQUIREMENTS ON OIL SPILL PREVENTION: Interim Report List of Tables and Figures TABLES  1-1   Comparison of Requirements of OPA 90 and IMO Regulation 13F for New Vessels,   9  1-2   Comparison of Requirements of OPA 90 and IMO Regulation 13G for Existing Vessels,   10  1-3   Main Features of Regional Port State Control Agreements,   12 FIGURES  1-1   Relationship of Section 4115 to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990,   5  1-2   Percent of remaining world tanker fleet tonnage based on OPA 90 single-hull tank vessel phase-out schedule,   6  1-3   Post-1990 initiatives with potential impact on oil pollution from tank vessel accidents,   7  2-1   Oil spills from vessel accidents in U.S. waters,   16  4-1   Change in oil shipments to the United States, 1990 and 1994,   30  4-2   Change in the volume of oil shipped to the United States, 1990 and 1994,   31

OCR for page R14
EFFECTS OF DOUBLE-HULL REQUIREMENTS ON OIL SPILL PREVENTION: Interim Report This page in the original is blank.