National Academies Press: OpenBook

Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors (1996)

Chapter: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

« Previous: EFFECTS OF MILITARY FUELS ON THE EYES AND SIGN
Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS." National Research Council. 1996. Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9133.
×

13

Conclusions and Recommendations

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists has not recommended exposure limits for the military fuels that are the subject of this report. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration and other regulatory agencies also have not promulgated standards for these fuels.

The toxicity data on military fuels are sparse. No reliable information was found to indicate a need to change the Navy's proposed PEL of 350 mg/m3. The findings in Swedish jet-motor factory workers of chronic CNS effects—performance degradation and neurasthenic symptoms—attributable to long-term exposure to jet fuels at TWA concentrations of 300 mg/m3 were considered questionable for reasons discussed above. The studies of hepatotoxicity in experimental animals were also considered to be of questionable significance. The PEL of 500 mg/m3 was based on a slight increase in liver weight in rats—an effect that was reversible and not accompanied by any histopathological change. Based

Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS." National Research Council. 1996. Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9133.
×

on the available information from studies in humans and animals and based on expert judgment, the subcommittee concludes that the Navy board's 8-hr PEL of 350 mg/m3 for JP-5, JP-8, and DFM is adequate to protect the health of naval personnel occupationally exposed to military fuels. Due to the uncertainty surrounding (1) the CNS effects observed in Swedish jet-motor factory workers from chronic exposure to jet fuel at TWA concentrations of 300 mg/m3 and (2) the NOAEL of 500 mg/m 3 derived from liver toxicity studies in rats and mice, the subcommittee recommends that the PEL of 350 mg/m3 be considered interim until further research is completed.

Data needed to evaluate the adequacy of the Navy's 15-min STEL of 1,800 mg/m3 for the three fuels are sparse. The subcommittee considered the acute CNS effects (e.g., dizziness, headache, nausea, and fatigue) in the Swedish jet-motor factory workers to be the most critical health effects for determining the adequacy of the STELs. Based on the limited information on exposure concentrations and the attribution of CNS symptoms to peak exposures of approximately 1,000 mg/m3 or higher, the subcommittee recommends that the Navy's current STEL be lowered from 1,800 mg/m3 to 1,000 mg/m3 to avoid acute CNS toxicity. The STEL of 1,000 mg/m3 should also be considered an interim recommendation until further research is completed.

The subcommittee also recommends the following:

  • Appropriate protective clothing should be worn to reduce dermal exposure because of the evidence of the carcinogenic potential of DFM via the dermal route.

  • Because respirable aerosols of military fuels are much more toxic than vapors, naval personnel should avoid exposure to aerosolized fuel. If a potential for exposure to aerosolized fuel exists, protective clothing and respiratory equipment should be worn.

  • The Navy should complete the following research to improve its ability to assess the health risks associated with the use of military fuels:

Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS." National Research Council. 1996. Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9133.
×
  • Obtain information on exposures occurring during operational procedures, including exposures to respirable aerosols of unburned fuels. Samples should be taken in the breathing zone of the service personnel. Breath analysis of exposed personnel is recommended to determine the extent of individual exposures to fuel vapors.

  • Conduct studies on the possible effects of high-level acute and low-level chronic exposure to military fuel vapors on the CNS, including the effects on the performance of personnel. At present, very little information exists. Anecdotal accounts do not provide adequate documentation of exposures leading to reduced performance.

  • Conduct further research on the effect of military fuel vapors on hepatotoxicity in experimental animals; this research would help to identify the NOAEL with greater confidence

Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS." National Research Council. 1996. Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9133.
×
Page 109
Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS." National Research Council. 1996. Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9133.
×
Page 110
Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS." National Research Council. 1996. Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9133.
×
Page 111
Next: REFERENCES »
Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors Get This Book
×
 Permissible Exposure Levels for Selected Military Fuel Vapors
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!