References

Aitchison, J., and J.A.C. Brown 1969 The Lognormal Distribution. University of Cambridge Department of Applied Economics, Monograph 5. London: Cambridge University Press.

ANSI 1988 American National Standard Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound, Part 1.Acoustical Society of America Document #S12.9-1988. New York: ANSI.

Borsky, P.N. 1965Community Reactions to Sonic Booms in the Oklahoma City Area. USAF Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory Rep. AMRL-TR-65-37. Ohio: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics (CHABA) 1977Environmental Impact Statements With Respect to Noise. Report of Working Group 69, Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1981Assessment of Community Response to High Energy Impulsive Sounds. Report of Working Group 84, Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

FICON (Federal Interagency Committee on Noise) 1992Final Report, Airport Noise Assessment Methodologies and Metrics, Washington, D.C.See also FICON (Federal Interagency Committee on Noise), 1992. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues, Committee Recommendations, Washington, DC.

Fidell, S., K.S. Pearsons, M. Grignetti, and D.M. Green 1970The noisiness of impulsive sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America48:1304-1310.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 53
Community Response to High-Energy Impulsive Sounds: An Assessment of the Field Since 1981 References Aitchison, J., and J.A.C. Brown 1969 The Lognormal Distribution. University of Cambridge Department of Applied Economics, Monograph 5. London: Cambridge University Press. ANSI 1988 American National Standard Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound, Part 1.Acoustical Society of America Document #S12.9-1988. New York: ANSI. Borsky, P.N. 1965Community Reactions to Sonic Booms in the Oklahoma City Area. USAF Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory Rep. AMRL-TR-65-37. Ohio: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics (CHABA) 1977Environmental Impact Statements With Respect to Noise. Report of Working Group 69, Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1981Assessment of Community Response to High Energy Impulsive Sounds. Report of Working Group 84, Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. FICON (Federal Interagency Committee on Noise) 1992Final Report, Airport Noise Assessment Methodologies and Metrics, Washington, D.C.See also FICON (Federal Interagency Committee on Noise), 1992. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues, Committee Recommendations, Washington, DC. Fidell, S., K.S. Pearsons, M. Grignetti, and D.M. Green 1970The noisiness of impulsive sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America48:1304-1310.

OCR for page 53
Community Response to High-Energy Impulsive Sounds: An Assessment of the Field Since 1981 Fidell, S., D. Barber, and T.J. Schultz 1991Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of noise-related annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America89(1). Fidell, S., and K.S. Pearsons 1993Comparison of Methods of Predicting Community Response to Impulsive and Nonimpulsive Noise. Sonic Boom Workshop, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. Fidell, S., T.J. Schultz, and D.M. Green 1988A theoretical interpretation of the prevalence rate of noise-induced annoyance in residential populations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84(6). Fields, J.M. 1991An Updated Catalog of 318 Social Surveys of Residents' Reactions to Environmental Noise (1943-1989). NASA Contractor Report 187553. 1993Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America93(5):2753-2763. Fields, J., C. Moulton, R. Baumgartner, and J. Thomas 1994Residents' Reactions to Long-Term Sonic Boom Exposure: Preliminary Results.In Proceedings of 1994 NASA Sonic Boom Conference, NASA Langley Research Center. Green, D.M., and S. Fidell 1991Variability in the criterion for reporting annoyance in community noise surveys. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89(1). Kryter, K.D., P.J. Johnson, and J.P. Young 1968Psychological Experiments on Sonic Booms Conducted at Edwards Air Force Base. USAF Contractor Report AF 49(638), USAF National Sonic Boom Evaluation Office, Arlington, Va. Leatherwood, J.D., K.P. Shepherd, and B.M. Sullivan 1991A New Simulator for Assessing Subjective Effects of Sonic Booms. NASA TM 104150. Leatherwood, J.D., and B.M. Sullivan 1992aSonic Boom Shaping for Reduced Loudness. NASA TM 4331. Published in Research and Technology 1991. 1992bSubjective Loudness Response to Simulated Sonic Booms. Presented at the NASA High Speed Research Sonic Boom Workshop, February 26, 1992, and published in High-Speed Research: Sonic Boom,NASA Conf. Publn. 3172. 1992cLaboratory Study of Effects of Sonic Boom Shaping on Subjective Loudness and Acceptability. NASA Technical Paper 3269. 1992dEffects of Sonic Boom Asymmetry on Subjective Loudness. NASA TM 107708. 1993aLoudness and Annoyance Response to Simulated Outdoor and Indoor Sonic Booms. NASA TM 107756. 1993bRecent Laboratory Studies of Loudness and Annoyance Response to Sonic Booms. Presented at NOISE-CON 93 (The 1993 National Conference on Noise Control Engineering), and published in Proceedings of NOISE-CON 93, Noise and Control Foundation, New York, NY. 1994a A Laboratory Study of Subjective Annoyance Response to Sonic Booms and Aircraft Flyovers. NASA TM 109113. 1994b Laboratory study of effects of sonic boom shaping on judged loudness and acceptability. Noise Control Engineering Journal42(2). Luz, G.A. 1985 A statistical model for predicting the probability of complaints from Army weapons noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America78(1):33. McCurdy, D.A. 1994 Subjective Response to Sonic Booms Having Different Shapes, Rise Times, and Durations. NASA TM 109090.

OCR for page 53
Community Response to High-Energy Impulsive Sounds: An Assessment of the Field Since 1981 Pierce, A.D., and D.J. Maglieri 1972Effect of atmospheric irregularities on sonic boom propagation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America51(23):702-721. Rosenblith, W.A., K.N. Stevens, and the Staff of Bolt Beranek and Newman 1953Handbook of Acoustic Noise Control, Vol. 2: Noise and Man. WADC TR-52-204, Wright Air Development Center. Ohio: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Rylander, R., and B. Lundquist 1996Annoyance caused by noise from heavy weapons and shooting ranges. Journal of Sound and Vibration. Schomer, P.D. 1977Evaluation of C-weighted Ldn for assessment of impulse noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62(2):396-399. 1978aHuman response to house vibrations caused by sonic booms or air blasts . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America64(1):328-330. 1978bThe growth function for human response to large amplitude impulse noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America64(6): 1627-1632. 1982A model to describe community response to impulse noise. Noise Control Engineering Journal18(1):5-15. 1985Assessment of community response to impulsive noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America77(2):520-535. 1994New descriptor for high-energy impulsive sounds. Noise Control Engineering Journal42(5):179-191. Schomer, P.D., and G. Luz 1994A revised statistical analysis of blast sound propagation. Noise Control Engineering Journal42(3):95-100. Schultz, T.J. 1978Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America64(2):337-405. Shepherd, K.P., B.M. Sullivan, J.D. Leatherwood, and D.A. McCurdy 1992Sonic Boom Acceptability Studies. Presented at the High-Speed Research Workshop, May 14-16, 1991,Williamsburg, Virginia, and published in the Proceedings of the First Annual High-Speed Research Workshop, NASA Conference Publication 10087 (part III), April 1992. Shepherd, K.P., and B.M. Sullivan 1990Loudness of Shaped Sonic Booms. Presented at NOISE-CON 90 (The 1990 National Conference on Noise Control Engineering), October 15-17 1990, and published in Proceedings, NOISE-CON 90, Noise and Control Foundation, Poughkeepsie, NY. 1991A Loudness Calculation Procedure Applied to Shaped Sonic Booms. NASA TP-3134. Stevens, S.S. 1972Perceived level of noise by mark VII and decibels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America51:575-601. Sutherland, L.C., R. Brown, and D. Goerner 1990Evaluation of Potential Damage to Unconventional Structures by Sonic Booms. Wyle Rpt. 89-14, Human Systems Division, Noise and Sonic Boom Impact Technology, HSD-TR-90-021, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. Young, J.R. 1976Measurement of the Psychological Annoyance of Simulated Explosion Sequences. Final Report Number 3160, Stanford Research Institute.

OCR for page 53