The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Community Response to High-Energy Impulsive Sounds: An Assessment of the Field Since 1981
Fidell, S., D. Barber, and T.J. Schultz 1991Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of noise-related annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America89(1).
Fidell, S., and K.S. Pearsons 1993Comparison of Methods of Predicting Community Response to Impulsive and Nonimpulsive Noise. Sonic Boom Workshop, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
Fidell, S., T.J. Schultz, and D.M. Green 1988A theoretical interpretation of the prevalence rate of noise-induced annoyance in residential populations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America84(6).
Fields, J.M. 1991An Updated Catalog of 318 Social Surveys of Residents' Reactions to Environmental Noise (1943-1989). NASA Contractor Report 187553.
1993Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America93(5):2753-2763.
Fields, J., C. Moulton, R. Baumgartner, and J. Thomas 1994Residents' Reactions to Long-Term Sonic Boom Exposure: Preliminary Results.In Proceedings of 1994 NASA Sonic Boom Conference, NASA Langley Research Center.
Green, D.M., and S. Fidell 1991Variability in the criterion for reporting annoyance in community noise surveys. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89(1).
Kryter, K.D., P.J. Johnson, and J.P. Young 1968Psychological Experiments on Sonic Booms Conducted at Edwards Air Force Base. USAF Contractor Report AF 49(638), USAF National Sonic Boom Evaluation Office, Arlington, Va.
Leatherwood, J.D., K.P. Shepherd, and B.M. Sullivan 1991A New Simulator for Assessing Subjective Effects of Sonic Booms. NASA TM 104150.
Leatherwood, J.D., and B.M. Sullivan 1992aSonic Boom Shaping for Reduced Loudness. NASA TM 4331. Published in Research and Technology 1991.
1992bSubjective Loudness Response to Simulated Sonic Booms. Presented at the NASA High Speed Research Sonic Boom Workshop, February 26, 1992, and published in High-Speed Research: Sonic Boom,NASA Conf. Publn. 3172.
1992cLaboratory Study of Effects of Sonic Boom Shaping on Subjective Loudness and Acceptability. NASA Technical Paper 3269.
1992dEffects of Sonic Boom Asymmetry on Subjective Loudness. NASA TM 107708.
1993aLoudness and Annoyance Response to Simulated Outdoor and Indoor Sonic Booms. NASA TM 107756.
1993bRecent Laboratory Studies of Loudness and Annoyance Response to Sonic Booms. Presented at NOISE-CON 93 (The 1993 National Conference on Noise Control Engineering), and published in Proceedings of NOISE-CON 93, Noise and Control Foundation, New York, NY.
1994a A Laboratory Study of Subjective Annoyance Response to Sonic Booms and Aircraft Flyovers. NASA TM 109113.
1994b Laboratory study of effects of sonic boom shaping on judged loudness and acceptability. Noise Control Engineering Journal42(2).
Luz, G.A. 1985 A statistical model for predicting the probability of complaints from Army weapons noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America78(1):33.
McCurdy, D.A. 1994 Subjective Response to Sonic Booms Having Different Shapes, Rise Times, and Durations. NASA TM 109090.