A
List of Presentations to the Panel

MEETINGS OF THE PANEL ON THE REVIEW OF THE OIL RECOVERY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Edith Allison, Department of Energy, Bartlesville Project Office, Oklahoma

Overview of the reservoir class oil recovery program: who is doing what where?

DOE review of proposals

M. Lee Allison, Utah Geological Survey

Developing improved completion techniques in the Bluebell Field plus aspects of Class II and III projects

Roger N. Anderson, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York; Lana Billeaud, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York; Larry Cathles, Cornell University, New York; and Peter Flemings, Pennsylvania State University

Dynamic enhanced recovery technologies

Sami Bou-Mikael, Texaco E&P, Inc., New Orleans

Post waterflood CO2miscible flood in light oil fluvial dominated deltaic reservoirs

Thomas D. Coffman, Cielo Energy Corporation, Texas

Perceptions and experience of an independent operator

William L. Fisher, University of Texas at Austin

Use of the “reservoir class” as an organizing concept



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 49
A List of Presentations to the Panel MEETINGS OF THE PANEL ON THE REVIEW OF THE OIL RECOVERY DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Edith Allison, Department of Energy, Bartlesville Project Office, Oklahoma Overview of the reservoir class oil recovery program: who is doing what where? DOE review of proposals M. Lee Allison, Utah Geological Survey Developing improved completion techniques in the Bluebell Field plus aspects of Class II and III projects Roger N. Anderson, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York; Lana Billeaud, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York; Larry Cathles, Cornell University, New York; and Peter Flemings, Pennsylvania State University Dynamic enhanced recovery technologies Sami Bou-Mikael, Texaco E&P, Inc., New Orleans Post waterflood CO2 miscible flood in light oil fluvial dominated deltaic reservoirs Thomas D. Coffman, Cielo Energy Corporation, Texas Perceptions and experience of an independent operator William L. Fisher, University of Texas at Austin Use of the “reservoir class” as an organizing concept

OCR for page 49
Travis Gillham and Reza Fassihi, Amoco Production Company, Houston; and Edward Turek, Amoco Exploration and Production Technology Group, Tulsa West Hackberry tertiary project Don W. Green, University of Kansas Improvement of oil recovery in fluvial dominated deltaic reservoirs in Kansas - Class I project, and improved oil recovery in Lower Meramecian (Mississippian) carbonate reservoirs of Kansas - near term - Class II project J. C. (Chris) Hall, Chairman, Petroleum Technology Transfer Council, Washington, D.C. Technology transfer activities and plans George Hirasaki, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Rice University, Texas The oil recovery program in Norway Mohan G. Kelkar, University of Tulsa Integrated approach towards the application of horizontal wells to improve waterflooding performance John Lomax, Lomax Exploration Company, Laguna Beach, California; and Miland Deo, University of Utah Green River Formation water flood demonstration project Kenneth Luff, Luff Exploration Company, Colorado Improved recovery demonstration for Williston Basin carbonates Charles Mankin, Oklahoma Geological Survey Identification and evaluation of fluvial-dominated deltaic reservoirs Todd Martinez, Michael Collins, and Lance Cole, BDM-Oklahoma BDM management of Class 4 programs and management of technology transfer Lee McRae and Mark Holtz, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin Revitalizing mature oil plays in Frio reservoirs of South Texas Keith Miles, Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center, DOE Contract awards/negotiations P. K. Pande, Fina Oil and Chemical Company, Texas Application of integrated reservoir management and reservoir characterization to optimize infill drilling Reginal W. Spiller, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Gas and Petroleum Technologies, Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. Overview of the program, DOE Office of Fossil Energy James O. Stephens, Hughes Eastern Corporation, Mississippi The utilization of the microflora indigenous to and present in oil-bearing formations to selectively plug the more porous zones thereby increasing oil recovery during waterflooding

OCR for page 49
Archie Taylor, OXY USA, Midland, Texas; Jim Justice, Advanced Research Technology; and Scott Hickman, Hickman & Associates, Houston, Texas Application of reservoir characterization and advanced technology to improve recovery and economics in lower quality shallow shelf San Andres reservoirs - Class II Noel Tyler, Director, Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin Background on definition of reservoir classes Don R. Wier and Larry Hallenbeck, Phillips Petroleum Co., Odessa, Texas Design and implementation of a CO2 flood utilizing advanced reservoir characterization and horizontal injection wells in a shallow shelf carbonate approaching waterflood depletion - Class II James R. Wood, University of South Florida and Michigan Technical University Recovery of bypassed oil in the Dundee formation using horizontal drains

OCR for page 49
This page in the original is blank.