National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Shipboard Pollution Control: U.S. Navy Compliance with MARPOL Annex V (1996)
Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications (CPSMA)

Citation Manager

. "APPENDIX B MATERIALS MANAGEMENT." Shipboard Pollution Control: U.S. Navy Compliance with MARPOL Annex V. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1996.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
51
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


SHIPBOARD POLLUTION CONTROL: U.S. Navy Compliance With MARPOL Annex V

For hazardous materials such as paint, the Navy has already initiated an excellent program to control both the materials and their packages, with significant source-reduction savings in both the materials and their packages.

For goods that are manufactured strictly or mostly for the Navy or other branches of the military, the procuring agencies routinely specify exactly the packages that are acceptable. There are substantial opportunities for source reduction in this area, many of them along the lines discussed above for shipping containers. Here too a switch from rigid to flexible packaging structures may be feasible and result in substantially less packaging waste for disposal.

Summary

If the Navy is to indeed work toward zero discharge from ships, the guiding principle is simple: if it goes on, it has to come off. Therefore, the less that goes on, the less that must be managed on board and ultimately off-loaded and disposed of. Further, if it is still useful when it comes off, then it can be reused and therefore does not require disposal. Although zero discharge may require more, or at least different, management on board, the overall impact may be less. Thus, attention should be given to reusable packages, as well as to smaller (less volume) packages.

Page
51