An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Programs: Fiscal Year 1993

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

About | Ordering | New

LoginRegister

| Items in cart [0]

Rights & Permissions

Free Resources

Display this book
on your site!

Related Titles

An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Programs: Fiscal Year 1993 (1994)
Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications (CPSMA)

Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format
Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web.
Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book.
Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic.

Citation Manager

. "APPENDIX D: LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 9, 1993, TO WILMER R. BOTTOMS FROM JOHN W. LYONS, DESCRIBING THREE NIST-WIDE ISSUES." An Assessment of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Programs: Fiscal Year 1993. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1994.

Please select a format:

Page
260


E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

An Assessment of the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS: Fiscal Year 1993

February 9, 1993

Dr. Wilmer R. Bottoms

Senior Vice President

Patricof and Co. One Embarcadero Place 2100 Geng Road, Suite 220 Palo Alto, CA94303

Dear Bill:

Enclosed is a description of some issues I would like the Board on Assessment of NIST Programs to address during their upcoming visits. I think it is important that the Board focus on a few NIST-wide issues in addition to their usual assessments of the Laboratory-based efforts, during each assessment period. The three issues I would like the Panels to focus on are: data programs, research balance, and the effects of the intramural and extramural programs on one another. The enclosed sheets provide some questions on these issues that I hope will assist you in focusing your thinking.

Sincerely,

John W. Lyons

Director