National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$43.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries (1986)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix D-3: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae Type b." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1986.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
187
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities, Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries

A polysaccharide-based vaccine for H. influenzae type b was licensed in the United States in April 1985. An improved vaccine is desirable for the reasons discussed in the last section of this appendix.

PATHOGEN DESCRIPTION

Noncapsulated H.influenzae strains, although common, are largely avirulent. There are six serotypes of H. influenzae with immunochemically distinct capsular polysaccharides (Egan et al., 1982). They are identified as types a, b, c, d, e, and f. Almost all invasive H. influenzae disease is caused by type b (Norden, 1982). Thus, a vaccination program can be directed against a single type.

Studies on the noncapsular surface antigens of H. influenzae type b in several laboratories have revealed a number of distinct strains within type b (Hansen et al., 1982a; Loeb and Smith, 1980). The relative prevalence of these different strains as a cause of disease varies with geographic locale. More than 20 different subtypes have been identified, but 5 or 6 account for most H. influenzae type b illness (Hansen et al., 1982a; Loeb and Smith, 1980). Subtyping is primarily of epidemiologic value, because all type b strains are killed by anti-type b polysaccharide antibodies. The type b polysaccharide has been purified and its structure determined. The repeating unit is → 3)-β-D-ribose-(1 → 1)-ribitol-5-phosphate.

HOST IMMUNE RESPONSE

Protection against invasive H. influenzae disease is due primarily to humoral immunity (Solotorovsky and Lynn, 1978). Protective antibodies are induced to both the capsular polysaccharide and major outer membrane surface proteins. Classic studies by Fothergill and Wright (1933) demonstrated an inverse relationship between the development of bactericidal antibodies and the age-related incidence of H. influenzae disease. The same inverse relationship has been demonstrated for antibodies directed against the type b capsular polysaccharide (Anderson et al., 1977).

Following the decline of maternally acquired immunity between 2 and 3 months of age, bactericidal antibodies generally are not detectable for about 3 years. They then rise slowly, reaching adult levels by about age 8. However, there is considerable individual variability in the pattern of antibody changes.

Clinical studies suggest a positive correlation between the presence of anti-type b antibodies and the relative absence of H. influenzae disease in children older than 5 years of age (Peltola et al., 1977). Passive protection studies in animals, primarily the infant rat, provide further evidence for the protective effects of antibodies against type b polysaccharide (Myerowitz and Norden, 1977).

There is strong evidence from the Finnish studies of the capsular polysaccharide (polyribophosphate) vaccine for the protective role of

Page
187
Front Matter (R1-R16)
1. Summary (1-18)
2. Priority Setting for Health-Related Investments: A Review of Methods (19-29)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (30-43)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens (44-62)
5. Predictions of Vaccine Development (63-75)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (76-81)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Differential Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (82-105)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (106-120)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (121-142)
Appendix A: Selection of Vaccine Candidates for Accelerated Development (143-148)
Appendix B: The Burden of Disease Resulting from Acute Respiratory Illness (149-158)
Appendix C: The Burden of Disease Resulting from Diarrhea (159-169)
Appendix D-1: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Dengue Virus (170-177)
Appendix D-2: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Escherichia coli (178-185)
Appendix D-3: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae Type b (186-196)
Appendix D-4: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (197-207)
Appendix D-5: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (208-222)
Appendix D-6: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Japanese Encephalitis Virus (223-240)
Appendix D-7: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Mycobacterium leprae (241-250)
Appendix D-8: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria meningitidis (251-266)
Appendix D-9: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (267-274)
Appendix D-10: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Plasmodium spp. (275-286)
Appendix D-11: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Rabies Virus (287-298)
Appendix D-12: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (299-307)
Appendix D-13: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (308-318)
Appendix D-14: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Salmonella typhi (319-328)
Appendix D-15: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Shigella spp. (329-337)
Appendix D-16: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus Group A (338-356)
Appendix D-17: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus pneumoniae (357-375)
Appendix D-18: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Vibrio cholerae (376-389)
Appendix D-19: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Yellow Fever (390-402)
Appendix E: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (403-411)
Appendix F: Technical Notes (412-412)
Appendix G: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (413-417)
Appendix H: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (418-419)
Appendix I: Contents of Supplement to Volume II (420-420)
Appendix J: Preface to Volume I (421-422)
Appendix K: Contents to Volume I (423-423)
Index (424-432)