National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$43.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries (1986)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "3. Overview of the Analytic Approach." New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities: Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1986.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
40
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


New Vaccine Development: Establishing Priorities, Volume II, Diseases of Importance in Developing Countries

TABLE 3.2 Rankings of Various Hypothetical Vaccinesa

Annualized Present Value of Potential Health Benefits

Annualized Present Value of Potential Expenditures on Vaccines ($ millions)

A

250

A

10

B, C

150

B

20

E, I

150

C

40

G

125

D

80

H

105

E

100

D, F

100

F

200

J

80

G

300

 

H

400

 

I

500

 

J

1,000

aGreater benefits and lower expenditures are preferred.

(either benefits or affordability) than vaccine y, and if x is as good as or better than y on the second dimension, then the choice of vaccine x dominates y. The first step in this procedure is to rank vaccine candidates on the basis of health benefit (greater is preferable) and on expenditure (lower is preferable). For the vaccines A through J listed in Table 3.1, the rankings are shown in Table 3.2.

GUIDELINES

Applying the test for dominance noted above to these candidate vaccines produces the results shown in Table 3.3 and summarized below:

  • vaccine A dominates all others

  • vaccine B dominates all except A

  • vaccine C dominates all except A and B

  • vaccine D dominates F and J

  • vaccine E dominates F, G, H, I, and J

  • vaccine F dominates J

  • vaccine G dominates H and J

  • vaccine H dominates J

  • vaccine I dominates J

By the rule of dominance, the top three social investments (as judged by these criteria) are vaccines A, B, and C, and the least attractive of the listed vaccines is J. The need to proceed further depends on the number of alternatives to be selected for development: if only one, two, or three were desired, we could identify the priorities as vaccines A, A and B, or A and B and C, respectively. The procedures for further selections are outlined below.

Page
40
Front Matter (R1-R16)
1. Summary (1-18)
2. Priority Setting for Health-Related Investments: A Review of Methods (19-29)
3. Overview of the Analytic Approach (30-43)
4. Comparison of Disease Burdens (44-62)
5. Predictions of Vaccine Development (63-75)
6. Assessing the Likely Utilization of New Vaccines (76-81)
7. Calculation and Comparison of the Health Benefits and Differential Costs Associated with Candidate Vaccines (82-105)
8. Additional Issues in the Selection of Priorities for Accelerated Vaccine Development (106-120)
9. Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (121-142)
Appendix A: Selection of Vaccine Candidates for Accelerated Development (143-148)
Appendix B: The Burden of Disease Resulting from Acute Respiratory Illness (149-158)
Appendix C: The Burden of Disease Resulting from Diarrhea (159-169)
Appendix D-1: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Dengue Virus (170-177)
Appendix D-2: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Escherichia coli (178-185)
Appendix D-3: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hemophilus influenzae Type b (186-196)
Appendix D-4: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis A Virus (197-207)
Appendix D-5: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Hepatitis B Virus (208-222)
Appendix D-6: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Japanese Encephalitis Virus (223-240)
Appendix D-7: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Mycobacterium leprae (241-250)
Appendix D-8: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Neisseria meningitidis (251-266)
Appendix D-9: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Parainfluenza Viruses (267-274)
Appendix D-10: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Plasmodium spp. (275-286)
Appendix D-11: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Rabies Virus (287-298)
Appendix D-12: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (299-307)
Appendix D-13: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Rotavirus (308-318)
Appendix D-14: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Salmonella typhi (319-328)
Appendix D-15: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Shigella spp. (329-337)
Appendix D-16: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus Group A (338-356)
Appendix D-17: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Streptococcus pneumoniae (357-375)
Appendix D-18: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Vibrio cholerae (376-389)
Appendix D-19: The Prospects for Immunizing Against Yellow Fever (390-402)
Appendix E: Questionnaire for Assessing Morbidity-Mortality Trade-Offs (403-411)
Appendix F: Technical Notes (412-412)
Appendix G: Biographical Notes on Committee Members (413-417)
Appendix H: Additional Sources of Advice to the Committee (418-419)
Appendix I: Contents of Supplement to Volume II (420-420)
Appendix J: Preface to Volume I (421-422)
Appendix K: Contents to Volume I (423-423)
Index (424-432)