rized. The combination may be especially important for deep transoms.
Although, according to Lechter (6), the method of collocation point shifting and analytic differentiation may break down at low Froude numbers, several enhancements might be made to the Rankine singularity method that was used to obtain numerical approximations to free-surface potential flows. They are related to the more general problem of calculating the linearized free-surface potential flow near arbitrarily shaped ships advancing into calm water. The first would be to eliminate the finite differencing at the hull waterline. This would eliminate all finite differences except those at the hull-transom intersection. Second, the relationship between free-surface paneling and collocation point shifting should be clarified. When a second small longitudinal shift downstream is used, damping is introduced into the wave pattern. Further, a more or less rectangular grid of panels on the free surface damps the waves in the Kelvin wave pattern more than the arrangement used in this paper, in which the computational free-surface domain is swept back at a 45-degree angle. The effect is most noticeable in the diverging waves seen in contour plots. Finally, it might be useful to consider whether something similar to the DtN exact boundary condition of Keller and Givoli (14) could be used for the outer boundaries of the computational domain to handle the boundary conditions there more accurately and to reduce the size of the computational domain.
This work was supported in part by the Applied Hydromechanics Research program of the Applied Research Division of the Office of Naval Research.
1. Lindenmuth, W.T., Ratcliffe, T.J., and Reed, A.M., “Comparative Accuracy of Numerical Kelvin Wake Code Predictions—‘Wake-Off'”. DTRC Ship Hydromechanics Dept. R & D Report DTRC-91/004, 1991, 257+xiv p.
2. Cheng, B.H., “Computations of 3D Transom Stern Flows,” Proc. Fifth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1989, pp. 581–592.
3. Reed, A., Telste, J., and Scragg, C., “Analysis of Transom Stern Flows,” Proc. Eighteenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1990, pp. 207–220.
4. Nakos, D.E. and Sclavounos, P.D. “Kelvin Wakes and Wave Resistance of Cruiser and Transom Stern Ships, ” Journal of Ship Research, to appear.
5. Tulin, M.P. and Hsu, C.C., “Theory of High-Speed Displacement Ships with Transom Sterns,” Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1986, pp. 186–193.
6. Lechter, J.S., “Properties of Finite-Difference Operators for the Steady-Wave Problem, ” Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, March 1993, pp. 1–7.
7. Jensen, P.S., “On the numerical radiation condition in the steady-state ship wave problem,” Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, March, 1987, pp. 14–22.
8. Eggers, K., Sharma, S.D., and Ward, L.W., “An Assessment of Some Experimental Methods for Determining the Wavemaking Characteristics of a Ship Form,” SNAME Transactions, Vol. 75, 1967, pp. 112–57.
9. Sharma, S.D., “A Comparison of the Calculated and Measured Free-Wave Spectrum of an Inuid in Steady Motion,” Proc. Int'l Seminar on Theoretical Wave-Resistance, Vol 1, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1963, pp. 203–272.
10. Dawson, C.W., “A Practical Computer Method for Solving Ship-Wave Problems,” Proc. Second International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Univ. of California: Berkeley, California, CA, 1977, pp. 30–38.
11. Sclavounos, P.D. and Nakos, D E., “Stability of Panel Methods for Free-Surface Flows with Forward Speed, ” Proc. Seventeenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1988, pp. 173–93.
12. Jenkins, D.S., “Resistance Characteristics of the High Speed Transom Stern Ship R/V Athena in the Bare Hull Condition, Represented by DTNSRDC Model 5365, ” Ship Performance Dept. R & D Report DTNSRDC-84/024, 1984, 59+ix p.
13. Ratcliffe, T.J. and Lindenmuth, W.T., “Kelvin Wake Measurements Obtained on Five Surface Ship Models,” DTRC Ship Hydromechanics Dept. R & D Report DTRC-89/038, 1990, 88+x p.
14. Keller, J.B. and Givoli, D., “Exact Non-reflecting Boundary Conditions,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 82, 1989, pp. 172–192.