. "4 EXPOSURE GUIDANCE LEVELS FOR HYDROFLUOROCARBON-123." Toxicity of Alternatives to Chlorofluorocarbons: HFC-134a and HCFC-123. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1996.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Toxicity of Alternatives to Chlorofluorocarbons: HFC-134a and HCFC-123
4
Exposure Guidance Levels for Hydrochlorofluorocarbon-123
INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Air Force requested that the NRC evaluate the adequacy of the 1-min EEGL for hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC)-123 that was proposed by toxicologists at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. HCFC-123 is a proposed substitute for Halon 1211, the fire extinguisher currently used by the Air Force. Appendix A of this report contains the documentation prepared by Air Force toxicologists in support of the proposed 1-min EEGL for HCFC-123. This supporting documentation was submitted to the subcommittee for consideration. It contains the background information on HCFC-123, reviews the toxicokinetics, toxicity, and exposure information and provides recommendations for exposure guidance levels.
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole. Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 41
Toxicity of Alternatives to Chlorofluorocarbons: HFC-134a and HCFC-123
4
Exposure Guidance Levels for Hydrochlorofluorocarbon-123
INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Air Force requested that the NRC evaluate the adequacy of the 1-min EEGL for hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC)-123 that was proposed by toxicologists at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. HCFC-123 is a proposed substitute for Halon 1211, the fire extinguisher currently used by the Air Force. Appendix A of this report contains the documentation prepared by Air Force toxicologists in support of the proposed 1-min EEGL for HCFC-123. This supporting documentation was submitted to the subcommittee for consideration. It contains the background information on HCFC-123, reviews the toxicokinetics, toxicity, and exposure information and provides recommendations for exposure guidance levels.
OCR for page 42
Toxicity of Alternatives to Chlorofluorocarbons: HFC-134a and HCFC-123
RECOMMENDATIONSFOR EXPOSURE GUIDANCE LEVELS
The documentation presented in Appendix A has been reviewed and revised in response to the subcommittee's comments. For HCFC-123, the end points of pharmacological or adverse effects considered for establishing an EEGL are cardiac sensitization, anesthesia or CNS-related effects, malignant hyperthermia, and hepatotoxicity.
Cardiac sensitization was chosen as the most sensitive end point because of the sensitizing effect of this chemical and similar chemicals in the epinephrine-challenged dog model. The EC50 for HCFC-123 was determined to be 1.9% (19,000 ppm) for a 5-min exposure (Trochimowicz and Mullin, 1973). The Air Force toxicologists recommended that the EC50 of 19,000 ppm be the 1-min EEGL for the HCFC-123. However, the subcommittee believes that 1,900 ppm (19,000 ppm divided by an uncertainty factor of 10 for interspecies variability) should be considered the human NOEL for a 1-min exposure to HCFC-123 in humans on the basis of the dog cardiac-sensitization model. Therefore, the subcommittee recommends that the 1-min EEGL of 19,000 ppm proposed by the Air Force be lowered to 1,900 ppm.
The justification for using the LC50 for developing the 1-min EEGL is as follows: (1) actual duration of exposure for humans would be one-fifth the duration of the dog-test exposure; and (2) tissue concentrations in humans would be much less in a 1-min exposure than those in the 5-min exposure of dogs.
REFERENCES
Trochimowicz, H.J., and L.S. Mullin. 1973. Cardiac Sensitization Potential (EC50) of Trifluorodichloroethane. Haskell Laboratory Rep. 132-73. Haskell Laboratory for Toxicology and Industrial Medicine , Wilmington, Del.
