. "14 Cardiovascular System." Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Measuring Exposures and Assessing Health Effects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1986.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Measuring Exposures and Assessing Health Effects
TABLE 14–2 Resting Acute Cardiovascular Effects in Nondiseased Humans of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke
Authors
Study Population
Conditions
Results
Measured Variable
Before
After
Luguette et al., 1970
40 children
Room: 9 m3
No. cig.: 6
Time: 15 min
Heart rate
Blood pressure
89
116/67
97
120/72
Harke and Bleichert, 1972
10
Room: n.g.
No. cig.: 150
Time: 20 min
Heart rate
Blood pressure
Skin temperature (−°C/min)
72±8
123/84
0
74±12
121/84
0.0273
Rummel et al., 1975
56
Room: 30 m3
No. cig.: 6–8
Time: 20 min
Heart rate
Blood pressure
72±10
117/71
71±11
117/71
Hurshman et al., 1978
8
Room: n.g.
No. cig.: 2–6
Time: 10 min
Heart rate
Blood pressure
73
107/67
79
114/68
Pimm et al., 1978
10 males
10 females
Age=22.3
Room: 14.6 m3
No. cig.: 7
Time: 2 h
Heart rate
84(F)
77(M)
80(F)
70(M)
CO, or ETS need to be separately studied. In addition, consideration needs to be given to persons of different sensitivity or vulnerability.
Healthy Subjects
Table 14–2 lists studies that report on the consequences of exposure of nondiseased individuals to ETS for periods up to 2 hours under experimental, resting conditions. There were no significant changes noted in heart rate or blood pressure in school-aged children or in adult men and women.
Two studies evaluated the physiologic responses to exercise with and without exposure to ETS. In the first, Pimm et al. (1978) (see also Table 14–2) had subjects perform a 7-minute progressive exercise test on an electronic bicycle ergometer. During exercise, the women had higher heart rates after exposure to ETS when compared with control conditions (differences of 6.3 beats per minute at 2 minutes and 4.5 beats per minute at 7 minutes, p<0.01). The recovery heart rates were not significantly different. The men, however, showed little difference between test and