Click for next page ( 90


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 89
Cited References Alm, Alvin. 1996. Accelerated Environmental Cleanup. Office of Environmental Management. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Energy. (Alm, 1996~. Aim, Alvin. 1997. Technology Deployment Memorandum from Alvin Aim. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. July 3. (AIm, 1997~. Alm, Alvin, and Modesto Maidique. 1996. Correspondence, "/attachment regarding X'Change 97. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. October 23. (Aim and Maidique, 19961. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 1997. Assessment of Technologies Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science and Technology: Results for the Peer Review for Fiscal Year 1997. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (ASME, 1997a). American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 1997. Peer Review of MAG*SEPtSM]. Review on April 23-25, in Atianta, GA. (ASME, 1997b). Barainca, Michael. 1998. New OST Process for Prioritization: Using the Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure Data to Make Budget Decisions. Paper presented to Committee on April 2. (Barainca, 1998~. Bauer, Car! O. 1996. Implementation of New Peer Review Policy. Washington, D.C.: DeparDnent of Energy. Memorandum for Distribution. (Batter, 199Q Bedick, Robert C. 1997. Industry and University Programs Overview (Viewgraphs). Presentation to Committee on May 9. (Bedick, 19971. Beitel, Dr. George A. 1996. Mixed Waste Focus Area Program Management Plan. Idaho Falls, ID: Department of Energy, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. October. (Beitel, 19961. Belier, John. 1997. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Management Technology Development Needs and Opportunities (Draft). LMITCO, Rev. 0.5. Idaho Falls, ID: Department of Energy. (Belier, 1997~. Berkey, Edgar. 1997. EMAB Perspective on OST Decision Making. Presentation to the Committee, November 10. (Berkey, 19971. Berkey, Edgar. 1998. Review of Focus Area Program. Paper presented to Department of Energy, Environmental Management Advisory Board on January 21. (Berkey, 1998~. Blush, Stephen M., and Thomas H. Heitman. 1995. Train Wreck Along the River of Money: An Evaluation of the Hanford Cleanup. Report presented to Unites States Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. March. (Blush and Heitman, 1995~. Bournakis, A.D., and G.D. Pine. 1997. Benefits of GRI R&D Results That Have Been Placed in Commercial Use in 1992 through 1996. Report No. GRT 97/0164. Chicago, TL: University of Illinois at Chicago Energy Resources Center. (Bournakis and Pine, 19971. Buede, Dennis M., and Daniel T. Maxwell. 1995. Rank Disagreement: A Comparision of Multi-Criteria Methodologies. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 4: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1-21. (Buede and Maxwell, 19951. Chernoff, H. and L. Moses. 1959. Elementary Decision Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Chernoff, and Moses, 1958~. 89

OCR for page 89
go Decision Making in the DOE-OST Christy, C. Edward. 1997. Industry Program Implementation. Presentation to Committee on May 9. (Christy, 19971. Conner, Julie, and Mike Connelly. 1996. Mixed Waste Focus Area Briefing to the National Academy of Sciences on November 12. (Conner and Connelly, 19961. Cooper, Robert G. 1993. Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Thea to Launch. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Cooper, 1993~. Corbin, Ruth, and A. A. I. Mariey. 1974. Random Utility Models with Equality: An Apparent, but Not Actual, Generalization of Random Utility Models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. ~ I: pp. 274-293. (Corbin and Mariey, 1974~. Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNFSB). 1998. information from website (www.duPsb.com.) accessed in October. (DNFSB, 19981. Department of Energy. undated. INEL TUentif~ed Technology Development Needs Prioritization. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, undated a). Department of Energy. undated. INEL TUentif~ed Technology Development Opportunities Prioritization. Washington, D.C.: DeparDnent of Energy. (DOE, undated b). Department of Energy. 1992. Hanford Strategic Plan. RichIand, WA: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1992~. Department of Energy. 1993. A New Approach to Environmental Research and Technology Development at DOE: Report of the Working Group (Viewgraphs). Washington, D.C.: DeparDnent of Energy. December 14. (DOE, 1993a). Department of Energy 1993. EM Progress. Summer 1993. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1993b). Department of Energy. 1994. A New Approach to Environmental Research and Technology Development at the U.S. DeparDnent of Energy: Action Plan. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. January 25. (DOE, 1994a). Department of Energy. 1994. FY 1995 Technology Development Needs Summary. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. March. (DOE, 1994b). DeparDnent of Energy. 1995. Draft Technical Task Plan Proposal Evaluation Cr~teria--DG-24-95. Idaho Falls, ID: Department of Energy, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. (DOE, 199Sa). Department of Energy. 1995. EM SSAB Recommendation on the EM FY-98 Integrated Priority List and RDS Rankings. Washington, D.C.: Deparunent of Energy. November 15. (DOE, 199Sb). Department of Energy. 1995. Estimating the Cold War Mortgage: The 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report, Vols. I-3. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. March. (DOE, 199Sc). Department of Energy. 1995. INEL EM Prioritization IPT Report. Idaho Falls, ID: Depardnent of Energy, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. December. (DOE, 19956~. DeparUnent of Energy. 1995. OST Background Series: 2: Final Report of the Task Force on Alternative Futures for the Deparunent of Energy National Laboratories (Calvin Report). Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. February I. (DOE 1995e). Depardnent of Energy. 1995. Scoring Instructions for INEL EM Prioritization. Idaho Fails, ID: Deparanent of Energy, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. December. (DOE, 1995f). DeparDnent of Energy. 1995. Site Needs Assessment Report. Washington, D.C.: Deparanent of Energy. (DOE, 1995g). Department of Energy. 1996. Attachment C--EM SSAB-INELMeeting Minutes: Recommendation: Fiscal Year 1998 Prioritization of Environmental Management Activities. Washington, D.C.: DeparDnent of Energy. January ~ 7. (DOE, ~ 996a). Department of Energy. 1996. Charter of the Site Technology Coordination Group (STCG) for the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Idaho Falls, ID: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996b).

OCR for page 89
Cited References 91 Department of Energy. 1996. Decontamination and Decommissioning Focus Area Annual Report 1996. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996c). Department of Energy. ~ 996. Efficient Separations and Processing Crosscutting Program Review Process. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 19966~. Department of Energy. 1996. Environmental Management Fiscal Year 1998 integrated Budget Prioritization. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996e). Department of Energy. 1996. Evaluation Plan: Large-Scale Demonstration Projects, Decontamination and Decommissioning Focus Area. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. May 30. (DOE, 1996f). DeparDnent of Energy. 1996. Final Meeting Minutes, January 16-17, Meeting of the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Board--Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. Held at the Centre on the Grove in Boise, Idaho: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996g). Department of Energy. 1996. INEL Identified Technology Development Needs Prioritization. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996h). Department of Energy. 1996. INEL Identified Technology Development Opportunities Pnontization. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996i). Department of Energy. 1996. Leveling the Playing Field. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. July 3. (DOE, 1996j). Department of Energy. 1996. LITCO Director and DOE-ID Program Manager Approval of INEL EM Program, FY97 Murder Board Priority List, ADS Baseline Rev. 4. Idaho Falls, ID: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996k). Department of Energy. 1996. Mixed Waste Focus Area Technology Development Requirements Document, Chemical Oxidation. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. July 30. (DOE, 19961). Department of Energy. 1996. Mixed Waste Focus Area Technology Development Requirements Document, Mercury Stabilization. Washington, D.C.: DeparDnent of Energy. August 19. (DOE, 1996m). Department of Energy. 1996. Mixed Waste Focus Area Technology Development Requirements Document, Mercury Amalgamation. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. July 30. (DOE, 1996n). Department of Energy. 1996. Office of Science and Technology Decision Process Standard Operating Procedures (Draft). Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. December ~ ~ . (DOE, 19960). DeparDnent of Energy. 1996. PI Requirements and Deliverables for the OST Technology Decision Process Procedures. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996p). Department of Energy. 1996. Pipe Explorer_ System: Innovative Technology SummaIy Report. Hazardous Waste Remedial Actions Program. Oak Ridge, TN: Hazardous Waste Remedial Actions Program. April. (DOE, 1996q). Department of Energy. 1996. Priority-Setting/Ranking Criteria. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. December 9-10. (DOE, 1996r). Department of Energy. 1996. Robotics Crosscutting Program: Technology Summary. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, Office of Science and Technology. August. (DOE, 1996s). Department of Energy. 1996. Robotics Technology Development Program Major Thrusts/Major Milestones Micro TTPs Fiscal Year 1997. Albuquerque, NM: Department of Energy, Albuquerque Operations Office. (DOE, 1996t). Department of Energy. 1996. Tanks Focus Area Multiyear Program Plan FY97-FY99. Richland, WA: Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest Laboratory. August. (DOE, 1996u). Department of Energy. 1996. Technology and Science Needs Summary (Draft). Washington, D.C.: DeparOnent of Energy. (DOE, 1996v).

OCR for page 89
92 Decision Making in the DOE OST Department of Energy. 1996. Technology Decision Process Pilot Review at Gate 4 of Subsurface Contaminant Focus Area Projects, ACT*DE*CON, Alternative Landfill! Cover. Oak Ridge, TN: DeparUnent of Energy. October 28-30. (DOE, 1996w). Department of Energy. 1996. Technology Needs Statements. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996x). Department of Energy. 1996. Technology Needs/Opportunities Statement Outline (Hanford Site). Richiand, WA: Department of Energy. December 13. (DOE, 1996y). Department of Energy. 1996. The ESP Project Priority Procedure (Predecisional Draft). Washington, D.C.: Deparunent of Energy. (DOE, 1996z) Department of Energy. 1996. Decontamination and Decommissioning Focus Area Results of the National Needs Assessment, July 24-25. 1996. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1996aa). Department of Energy. 1997. 1997 D&D Needs. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 1997a). Department of Energy. 1997. Accelerating Cleanup: Focus on 2006 (Discussional Draft). Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. June. (DOE, 1997b). DeparOnent of Energy. 1997. D&D Focus Area Quarterly Report, January-March 1997 Activity. Morgantown, WV: Department of Energy, Federal Energy Technology Center. (DOE, 1997c). Department of Energy. 1997. Efficient Separations and Processing Crosscutting Program's (ESP-CP) presentation to the National Academy of Sciences, Committee for Environmental Management Technologies, Decision Making Subcommittee on June 6. (DOE, 199741. Department of Energy. 1997. Implementation Proposal for Center for Acquisition and Business Excellence. Morgantown, WV: Department of Energy, Federal Energy Technology Center. February 13. (DOE, 1997e). Department of Energy. 1997. Information from the July 1997 PEG Meeting in Gaithersburg. Washington, D.C.: DeparDnent of Energy. (DOE, 1997f). Department of Energy. 1997. New DOE-OST Deployment initiative. Washington, D.C.: Deparunent of Energy. (DOE, 1997g). Department of Energy. 1997. OST Background Series: 3: COE Reports Relevant to the Office of Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. April. (DOE, 1997h). Department of Energy. 1997. OST Process for Prioritization (Predecisional Draft). Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. July 14. (DOE, 1997i). DeparDnent of Energy. 1997. Strategic Plan. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. September. (DOE, 1997j). DeparDnent of Energy. 1997. Technology Management Review. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, Office of Science and Technology. July 8. (DOE, 1997k). Department of Energy. 1997. Technology Needs Statements. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (DOE, 19971~. Department of Energy. 1998. Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. June. (DOE, 1998a). Depardnent of Energy. 1998. Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure (Draft). Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. February. (DOE, 1998b). Department of Energy. undated. Management Plan. Richland, WA: Department of Energy. (DOE, undated-a). Department of Energy. undated. Mixed Waste Subgroup Technology Needs Scoring Sheet. RichIand, WA: Department of Energy. (DOE, undated-lo). DeparDnent of Energy. undated. Problem Prioritization Cnteria (Sample). Richiand, WA: Department of Energy. (DOE, undated-c). Department of Energy. undated. Tank Technology Needs Scoring Sheet (Sample). Richiand, WA: Deparanent of Energy. (DOE, undated-d).

OCR for page 89
Citec! References 93 Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington State Department of Ecology, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Tri-Cities Commercialization Partnership. 1996. Hanford Technology Deployment Center Program Plan. Richiand, WA: Department of Energy. August. (DOE, et al. 1996~. E.T. Du Pont De Nemours and Company. 1993. Corporate Environmentalism: 1993 Progress Report. DuPont Printing and Publishing. (DuPont, 1993~. Ecology and Environment, Tnc. 1996. Overview of Methods Used to Develop the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory: Identified Needs and Opportunities Prioritization Tables (Draft). Idaho Falls, ID: Ecology and Environment, Tnc. November 4. (Ecology and Environment, 1996~. Edwards, Allen Louis. 1954. Statistical Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Rinehart. (Edwards, 1954~. Epstein, Marc I. 1995. Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance. (Epstein, 1995~. Fishburn, P.C. 1964. Decision and Value Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Fishburn, 1964~. Frank, Clyde. 1997. Office of Science and Technology Update and Program Data Analysis. Presentation to Committee on June 25. (Frank, 1997a). Frank, Clyde. 1997. Presentation to the Committee on March 20, 1997. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (Frank, 1997b). Frey, Jeff, and Tom Brouns. 1997. Tanks Focus Area Process for Program Development Needs Identification & Technical Response Development. Richiand, WA: Department of Energy, Tanks Focus Area. January 9. (Frey and Brouns, 1997~. Frolio, Nancy. 1996. Technology Decision Process Pilot Program. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. Memorandum to lames Wright and Car! Bauer. November 14. (Frolio, 1996~. Gas Research Institute. 1996. Gas Research Institute: 1997-2001 Research and Development Plan and 1997 Research and Development Program. Chicago, IL: GRI. April. (GRI, 1996a). Gas Research Institute. 1996. Results of Appraisal of GRI: 1997-2001 R&D Plan. Chicago, {L: GRI. ApnT. (GRI, 1996b). Gas ResearchInstitute. 1997. Basic Research (1996 Results). Chicago, IL: GRI. June. (GRI, 1997a). Gas Research Institute. 1997. Gas Research Institute: 1998-2002 Research and Development Plan and 1998 Research and Development Program. Chicago, IL: GRI. April. (GRI, 1997b). Gas Research Institute. 1997. Results of Appraisal of GRI: 1998-2002 R&D Plan. Chicago, IL: GRI. June. (GRI, 1997c). Gas Research Institute. 1998. Gas Research Institute 1999 to 2003 Plan and 1999 Research and Development Program. Chicago, IL: GRI. (GRT, 1998~. General Accounting Office. 1992. Cleanup Technologies. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office. (GAO, 1992~. General Accounting Office. 1994. Management Changes Needed to Expand Use of Innovative Cleanup Technologies: Report to the Secretary of Energy. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office. August. (GAO, 1994~. General Accounting Office. 1996. Energy Management: Technology Development Program Taking Action to Address Problems. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office. July. (GAO, 19961. General Accounting Office. 1998. Nuclear Waste: Furler Actions Needed to Increase Use of Innovative Cleanup Technologies. Report to Congressional Committees. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office. September. (GAO, 1998~. Hammond, John S., Ralph L. Keeney, and Howard Raiffa. 1999. Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. (Hammond, Keeney, and Raiffa, 1999~. Harness, Jerry. 1997. Presentation to the Committee. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. (Harness, 19971.

OCR for page 89
94 Decision Making in the DOE OST Hart, Paul, 1997. Decision Making within the Decontamination and Decommissioning Focus Area. Presentation to the Committee May 8-9. (Hart, 19971. Heeb, Michael. 1996. implementation of New Peer Review Policy. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. Memorandum for Distribution. November ~ 8. (Heeb, ~ 996~. Holmes, I.D. 1994. White Water Ahead: Eastman Prepares for Turbulent Times. Industrial Research Institute: Research Technology Management. (Holmes, 19944. Holt, Mark and Jeff Day. 1997. Memorandum, Congressional Research Service: Mark Holt & Jeff Day to Senate Appropriations Committee regarding Environmental Technology Development at DOE. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. (Holt and Day, 1997~. Howard, Ronald A. 1966. Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press of MIT. (Howard, 1966~. Howard, R.A., and I.E. Matheson (eds.~. 1983. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. Palo Alto, CA.: Strategic Decisions Group. (Howard and Matheson, 19831. Hyde, Jerry. 1996. Correspondence from ferry Hyde to Car! Bauer and Tom Anderson regarding D&D National Needs. August I. (Hyde, 1996~. Keeney, Ralph L. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision-Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Keeney, 19921. Lander, Lynn, David Matheson, Michael M. Menke, and Derek L. Ransley. 1995. improving the R&D Decision Process. Industrial Research Institute: Research-Technology Management (Ianuary- Februrary). (Lander, Matheson, Menke and Ransley, 1995~. Lankford, Mac. 1997. Technology Integrations Systems Applications Programs--Domestic Programs-- International Programs. Presentation to the Committee on November 10, Washington, D.C. Deparunent of Energy. (Lankford, 1997~. Levary, Reuven, and Neil E. Seitz. 1990. Quantitative Methods for Capital Budgeting. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company. (Levary and Seitz, 1990~. LEAF v. Hoaxed. 586 Federal Supp. ~ 163. Love, Betty R. 1997. Correspondence to Steven I. Bossart regarding Consensus Reports for the Review Pane! of RST. l:nstitute for Regulatory Science. April, 9. (Love, ~ 997~. Luce, R.D., and H. Raiffa. 1958. Games and Decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Luce and Raiffa, 19581. March, James G. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York, NY: The Free Press. (March, 1994~. March, James G. 1999. The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc. (March, 1999~. Market, Ken. 1997. Partnering with the Private Sector: The Key to Future Federal R&D Investment. Presentation to Committee on May 8-9. (Marker, 1997~. Martin, H. Dale. 1994. Environmental Planning: Balancing Environmental Commitments with Economic Realities. Presentation at the Proceedings of the Environmental Management in a Global Economy (GEMI'94) Conference. (Martin, 1994~. Martin, H. Dale. 1997. Environmental Planning--Balancing Environmental Commitments with Economic Realities. Speech before the Southeastern Electrical Exchange, Charlotte, NC: June 26. (Martin, 1997~. Martino, I. 1995. R&D Project Selection. New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Martino, 1995~. Matalucci, Rudolph V., Chariene Esparaza-Baca, and Richard D. Jimenez. 1995. Characterization, Monitoring, and Sensor Technology Catalogue. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories. December. (Matalucci, Esparanz-Baca, and Jimenez, 1995~. Matheson, D., and I. Matheson. 1998. The Smart Organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. (Matheson and Matheson, 1998~.

OCR for page 89
Cited References 95 Matheson, James E. and Michael M. Menke. 1994. Using Decision Quality Principles to Balance Your R&D Portfolio. Industrial Research Institute: Research-Technology Management (November- December). (Matheson and Menke, 1994) Matheson, David, lames E. Matheson, and Michael M. Menke. 1994. Making Excellent R&D Decisions. Industrial Research Institute: Research-Technology Management. (Matheson, Matheson, and Menke, 1994~. Mathur, John. 1997. Discussion with the Committee. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy. June. (Mathur, 1997~. Menke, Michael M. 1994. R&D Quality Tools. industrial Research institute: Research-Technology Management. (Menke, 19941. Menke, Michael M. 1997. Essentials of R&D Strategic Excellence. industrial Research institute: Research Technology Management. (Menke, 1997a). Menke, Michael M. 1997. Managing R&D for Competitive Advantage. Research-Technology Management. (Menke, 1997b). Myers, Joy. 1996. Correspondence to John Wilcynski regarding recommendations from the Environmental Management Site Specific Advisory Board. March 25. (Myers, 1996~.. National Environmental Technology Applications Center. 1995. Barriers to Environmental Technology Commercialization. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Applied Research Center. April. (NETAC, 1995~. National Research Council. 1989. Nuclear Weapons Complex: Management for Health, Safety, and the Environment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 1989~. National Research Council. 1994. Building Consensus Through Risk Assessment and Management of the Department of Energy's Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 1994~. National Research Council. 1995. Improving the Environment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (ARC, 1995a). National Research Council. 1995. The Committee on Environmental Management Technologies Report for the Period Ending December 3l, 1994. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, l995b). National Research Council. 1996. Barriers to Science: Technical Management in the Depar~nent of Energy Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 1996a). National Research Council. 1996. Environmental Management Technology-Development Program at the Depardnent of Energy 1995 Review. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, l99b). National Research Council. 1996. The Hanford Tanks: Environmental Impacts and Policy Choices. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 1996c). National Research Council. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 19966~. National Research Council. 1997. Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program: Final Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 1997a). National Research Council. 1997. Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology: Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 1997b). National Research Council. 1998. A Review of Decontamination and Decommissioning Technology Development Programs at the Department of Energy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, l99Sa). National Research Council. 1998. Peer Review in Environmental Technology Development Programs: The Department of Energy--Office of Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, l998b).

OCR for page 89
96 Decision Making in the DOE OST National Research Council. 1999. An End State Methodology for Identifying Technology Needs for Environmental Management: With an Example from the Hanford Site TaIIks. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 1999a). National Research Council. 1999. Evaluating Federal Research Programs: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. (NRC, 1999b) Paladino, Joseph, and Brian Fox. undated. A Framework for R&D Planning in EM (Draft). Prepared for the TD Council and EM Focus Group. (Paladino and Fox, undated). Paladino, Joseph, and Paul Longwor~. 1995. Maximizing R&D investments in the Deparunent of Energy's Environmental Cleanup Program. Technology Transfer (December). pp. 96-107. (Paladino and Longwor~, 1995~. Pratt, I., H. Raiffa, and R. Schiaifer. 1965. Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Pratt, Raiffa, and Schaifler, 1965~. President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. 1997. Report to the President on Federal Energy Research and Development for the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century. Washington, D.C.: President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Pane! on Energy Research and Development. November. (PCAST, 1997~. Purdy, Caroline. 1997. Decision Making Review: Characterization, Monitoring, and Sensor Technologies. Presentation to Committee. (Purdy, 1997~. Raiffa, H. 1968. Decision Analysis. Redding, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. (Raiffa, 1968~. Rezendes, Victor S. 1997. Cleanup Technology: DOE'S Program to Develop New Technologies for Environmental Cleanup. Testimony before the United States House of Representatives Subcommittee on Oversight and investigations. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office. (Rezendes, 1997~. Russell, Milton, E. William Colglazier, and Mary English. 1991. Hazardous Waste Remediation: The Task Ahead. Knoxville, TN: Waste Management Research and Education institute, University of Tennessee. December. (Russell, Colglazier, and English). Russo, I. Edward, and Paul Schoemaker. 1989. Decision Traps: Ten Barriers to Excellent Decision Making and How to Overcome Them. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. (Russo, and Shoemaker, 1989~. Saaty, Thomas L. 1994. Fundamental of Decision Making and Priority Theory: With the Analytic Hierarchy Process,Vol.VT.Pittsburgh,PA:RWS Publications. (Saaty, 19941. Saaty, Thomas L. 1996. Decision Making with Dependence Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. (Saaty, 1996~. Saaty, Thomas L., and Luis G. Vargas. 1998. Diagnosis with Dependent Symptoms: Bayes Theorem and The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Operations Research, Vol. 46 (41: July- August. INFORMS. pp. 491-502. (Saaty and Vargas, 1998~. Saaty, Thomas L., and Luis G. Vargas. 1993. Experiments on Rank Preservation and Reversal in Relative Measurement. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, Vol. 17 (4/51: Pergamon Press, Ltd. pp. 13-~. (Saaty and Vargas, 1993~. Saget, Shannon. 1996. Summary--Hanford STCG Prioritization Methodology. Richiand, WA: Department of Energy. (Sages, 1996~. Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like A State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Scott, 1998~. Simon, Herbert A. 1997. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (fourth edition). New York, NY: The Free Press. (Simon, 1997~. Simon, Herbert A., Donald W. Smithburg, and Victor A. Thompson. 1991. Public Administration. New Brunswick, NI: Transaction Publishers. (Simon, Smithburg, and Thompson 1991~. Snelling, Robert N., and Susan Wood. 1996. Correspondence to Clyde Frank regarding Transmittal of Vitrification Systems Information Package. May I. (Spelling and Wood, 1996~.

OCR for page 89
Cited References 97 Stigum, Bernt P., and Fred Wenstop. 1983. Foundations of Utility and Risk Theory with Applications. Dordrecht,Holland: D. ReidelPublishing Company. (Stigum end Wenstop, 1983~. SurIes, Terry. 1997. Letter to Alvin Aim with viewgraphs entitled "Review Recommendations for Office of Science and Technology Policy". May ~5. (SurIes, 19971. Tribus, Myron. 1969. Rational Descriptions, Decisions, and Designs. New York: Pergamon Press. (Tribus, 1969~. Tuchman, Barbara. 1992. The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam. New York, NY: Ballantine Books. (Tuchman, 1992~. Tversky, Amos, and Itamar Simonson. 1993. Context-Dependent Preferences. Management Science, Vol. 39 (10~: October. Institute of Management Sciences. pp. Il79-~89. (Tversky and Simonson, 1993~. Tversky, Amos, Paul SIovic, and Daniel Kahneman. 1990. The Causes of Preference Reversal. The American Economic Review, Vol. 80 Gil: March. pp. 204-217. (Tversky, SIovic, and Kahneman, 1990~. United States. Army Corps of Engineers. 1997. Project EM Task Force Phase ~ Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. February. (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 19971. United States Congress. 1989. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991. P.~. 101-~89, Sec. 3141 (H.R. 2461~. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. (US Congress, 1989~. United States Congress, Senate. 1992. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill, 1993. Report to accompany H.R. 5373. 102d Congress, 2d session, pp. 138-139. July 27. (U.S. Congress, 1992~. United States Congress, House of Representatives. 1994. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill, 1995. Report to accompany H.R. 4506. 103d Congress, 2d session, pp.76-77, Lee. May 26. (U.S. Congress, 1994~. United States Congress, House of Representatives. 1995. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill, 1996. Report to accompany H.R. 1905. 104~ Congress, 1St session, pp. 77-78. June 20. (U.S. Congress, 1995a). United States Congress, Senate. 1995. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill, 1996. Report to accompany H.R. 1905. 104~ Congress, 1St session, pp. 110-111. July 27. (U.S. Congress, l995b). United States Congress, House of Representatives, Committee on Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. 1997. Summary of Congressional Testimony on Department of Energy/Off~ce of Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: Committee on Commerce. May 7. (U.S. Congress, 1997~. United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1986. Research Funding as an Investment: Can We Measure the Returns?--A Technical Memorandum. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. April. (U.S. Congress, 1986~. Von Neumann, I., and O. Morgenstern. 1953. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Revised edition. Princeton, N.~.: Princeton Univ. Press. (don Neumann and Morgenstern, 19531. Walker, Jef. 1997. Current Status and Future Directions of Science and Technology in the EM Program. Presentation to the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Peer Review. (Walker, 1997a). Walker, Jef. 1997. New OST Process for Prioritization: Making OST Decisions More Responsive to the DOE Sites through the 2006 Plan. Paper presented to Committee on November 10. (Walker, 1997b). Wang, Paul. 1997. Correspondence from Paul Wang to CEMT Committee Members. Santa Barbara, CA: Special Technologies Laboratory. May 23. (Wang, 1997~. Wengle, John. 1997. E-mai! Correspondence from John Wengle to Carolyn Davis regarding NAS request for information. October 30. (Wengle, 19971.

OCR for page 89
98 Decision Making in the DOE OST Williams, R. Eric. 1996. Correspondence to Julie Conner regarding Mixed Waste Focus Area High Temperature Melter Strategy Recommendations for FY97. May 3 I. (Williams, 19961. Wolf, Stanley. 1997. E-mai! Correspondence from Stanley Wolf to Carolyn Davis regarding reply to ORO Information Request Mom NAS. October 24. (Wolf, 19971. Wright, km. 1996. Priority-Setting/Ranking Criteria Presentation to the Committee. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Environmental Management Technologies, Decision-Making Process for Selection and Prioritization Panel. (Wright, 19961. Yarbrough, Linton. 1997. Robotics Technology Development Program. Presentation to Committee on June 6. (Yarbrough, 1997~. Zeleny, Milan. 1982. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company. (Zeleny, 19821.