|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. pursued. The committee proposes conducting such expanded reviews in early 1995.” Response: Need acknowledged. “We would like to respond briefly here to some of the major recommendations and offer more detailed dialog during the next peer review.”
“In the interest of maintaining the viability of the PNGV program, the committee strongly recommends that the government and industry partners address program deficiencies at the earliest possible time. ” Response: As indicated above. (Peer review report issued October 1994. Letter dated March 3, 1995.)
|
|
|||||||||||||||
