pursued. The committee proposes conducting such expanded reviews in early 1995.”
Response: Need acknowledged.
“We would like to respond briefly here to some of the major recommendations and offer more detailed dialog during the next peer review.”
Recommendation: Timely Correction of Program Deficiencies
“In the interest of maintaining the viability of the PNGV program, the committee strongly recommends that the government and industry partners address program deficiencies at the earliest possible time. ”
Response: As indicated above. (Peer review report issued October 1994. Letter dated March 3, 1995.)
The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
C PNGV Response to the Phase 1 Report and Supporting Documentation ."
Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles: Second Report . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press,
Please select a format: