References

DoD (U.S. Department of Defense). 1992. Department of Defense Directive 5000.4, Cost Analysis Improvement Group, November 24, 1992. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense.

DoD. 1996. Department of Defense Directive 5000.1, Defense Acquisitions, March 15, 1996. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1995. Life Cycle Asset Management. DOE Order 430.1. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

DOE. 1996a. Project Execution and Engineering Management Planning. Good Practice Guide, GPG-FM-010. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

DOE. 1996b. Project Reviews. Good Practice Guide, GPG-FM-015. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

DOE. 1997. Harnessing the Market: The Opportunities and Challenges of Privatization . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

GAO (General Accounting Office). 1996. Department of Energy: Opportunities to Improve Management of Major System Acquisitions. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. GAO/RCED-97-17. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

IPA (Independent Project Analysis, Inc.). 1993. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Project Performance Study. Reston, Va.: Independent Project Analysis, Inc.

IPA. 1996. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Project Performance Study Update. Reston, Va.: Independent Project Analysis, Inc.

NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1997. NASA Program and Project Management Process and Requirements, Draft Document. NPG 7120.5A. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 39
About this PDF file: This new digital representation of the original work has been recomposed from XML files created from the original paper book, not from the original typesetting files. Page breaks are true to the original; line lengths, word breaks, heading styles, and other typesetting-specific formatting, however, cannot be retained, and some typographic errors may have been accidentally inserted. Please REFERENCES 39 References DoD (U.S. Department of Defense). 1992. Department of Defense Directive 5000.4, Cost Analysis Improvement Group, November 24, 1992. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense. DoD. 1996. Department of Defense Directive 5000.1, Defense Acquisitions, March 15, 1996. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1995. Life Cycle Asset Management. DOE Order 430.1. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1996a. Project Execution and Engineering Management Planning. Good Practice Guide, GPG-FM-010. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1996b. Project Reviews. Good Practice Guide, GPG-FM-015. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997. Harnessing the Market: The Opportunities and Challenges of Privatization. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. GAO (General Accounting Office). 1996. Department of Energy: Opportunities to Improve Management of Major System Acquisitions. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. GAO/RCED-97-17. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. IPA (Independent Project Analysis, Inc.). 1993. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Project Performance Study. Reston, Va.: Independent Project Analysis, Inc. IPA. 1996. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Project Performance Study Update. Reston, Va.: Independent Project Analysis, Inc. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1997. NASA Program and Project Management Process and Requirements, Draft Document. NPG 7120.5A. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. use the print version of this publication as the authoritative version for attribution.

OCR for page 39
About this PDF file: This new digital representation of the original work has been recomposed from XML files created from the original paper book, not from the original typesetting files. Page breaks are true to the original; line lengths, word breaks, heading styles, and other typesetting-specific formatting, however, cannot be retained, and some typographic errors may have been accidentally inserted. Please REFERENCES 40 NRC (National Research Council). 1996. Environmental Management Technology—Development Program at the Department of Energy: 1995 Review. Board on Radioactive Waste Management, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1997a. Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program: Final Assessment. Board on Radioactive Waste Management, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1997b. Interim Report: Peer Review in the Department of Energy Office of Science and Technology. Board on Radioactive Waste Management, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1997c. Review of the Department of Energy's Inertial Confinement Fusion Program: The National Ignition Facility. Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, National Research Councilunk>. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 1997. Project EM Taskforce Phase One Report. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. U.S. Congress. 1997. House Report 105-271. Committee of Conference Report. 105th Congress. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. The World Bank. 1997. Improving Supervision Quality: An Approach Paper, June 9, 1997. Quality Assurance Group. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION DOE. 1991. Quality Assurance. DOE Policy 5700.6C. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1992. Cost Estimating, Analysis, and Standardization. DOE Policy 5700.5A. Office of Procurement, Assistance, and Program Managementunk>. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1996. Special Report on the Audit of the Management of Department of Energy Construction Projects. DOE/IG-0398. Office of the Inspector General. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1996. Implementation Guide for Use With Independent and Management Assessment Requirements of 10 CFR part 830.120 and DOE 5700.6C, Quality Assurance. DOE Guide 414.1-1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. use the print version of this publication as the authoritative version for attribution.

OCR for page 39
About this PDF file: This new digital representation of the original work has been recomposed from XML files created from the original paper book, not from the original typesetting files. Page breaks are true to the original; line lengths, word breaks, heading styles, and other typesetting-specific formatting, however, cannot be retained, and some typographic errors may have been accidentally inserted. Please REFERENCES 41 DOE. 1996. Good Practice Guides. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997. Department of Energy Review of the National Spallation Neutron Source Project. Office of Energy Research. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997. Cost Estimating, Guide. DOE Policy 5700.5A. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997. Energy Systems Acquisition Advisory Board Procedures Notice. DOE N 430.1, Approved 10/28/97. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997. Fiscal Year 1999 Project Review/Validation Guidance, with two attachments; DOE Project Planning and Validation Guidance, and Implementation of OMB Circular A-11, Part 3, Preparation of Exhibit 300B. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997. Summary Project Performance Report to Senior Managers. Memorandum dated 09/27/97. Office of Field Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997. FM-20 Proposed Project Performance Reporting and Review Initiative. Memorandum dated 11/7/97. Office of Fixed Asset Management. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. DOE. 1997. Audit of Renovation and New Construction Projects at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. WR-B-97-06. Office of the Inspector General. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Energy. GAO. 1997. Department of Energy: Opportunities to Improve Management of Major System Acquisitions. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. GAO/RCED-97-17. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. GAO. 1997. Nuclear Waste: Department of Energy's Project to Cleanup Pit 9 at Idaho Falls is Experiencing Problems. Report to the Committee on Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives. GAO/RCED-97-180. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. Richanbach, Paul H, et.al. 1997. The Organization and Management of the Nuclear Weapons Program (120 Day Study), February 27, 1997 Draft. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Defense Analysis. use the print version of this publication as the authoritative version for attribution.

OCR for page 39
About this PDF file: This new digital representation of the original work has been recomposed from XML files created from the original paper book, not from the original typesetting files. Page breaks are true to the original; line lengths, word breaks, heading styles, and other typesetting-specific formatting, however, cannot be retained, and some typographic errors may have been accidentally inserted. Please use the print version of this publication as the authoritative version for attribution. REFERENCES D.C.: Government Printing Office. 42 U.S. Congress. 1997. Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Parts 4 and 5, Department of Energy Fiscal Year 1998 Budget Justifications and Testimony. 105th Congress, 1st Session. House Committee on Appropriations. Washington,