National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Contents
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 1998. Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9525.
×

Executive Summary

In November 1997 Congress requested that the National Research Council study the feasibility of developing a scale to compare (“link”) scores from existing commercial and state tests to each other and to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) (see P.L. 105-78). The Committee on Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests is carrying out the requested study. This report presents the committee 's general findings and conclusions; it will be followed by the committee 's more detailed final report in fall 1998.

The request for the study arose in the context of congressional debate about the proposed voluntary national tests. The committee assumes that the development of a method to link and compare the full array of existing tests is seen as a possible substitute for the development of new national tests. Although our findings and conclusions may be relevant to certain technical issues in the debate over the national tests, we take no position on their overall technical or policy merits.

We have reviewed empirical evidence of two basic types: on the diversity in content, usage, and purposes of educational testing in the United States and on statistical and other technical aspects of creating valid linkages among various types of educational tests.

Our findings from this review raise fundamental questions about the feasibility of linkage as envisioned by the committee's charge. Although it may be technically possible to establish links between tests that are highly similar in design, format, content emphasis, difficulty level, and intended use, those conditions do not apply to the increasingly diverse and complex array of state and commercial tests in the nation 's 50 states and more than 15,000 school districts. In addition, those tests differ substantially from NAEP, which is designed specifically to provide scores for groups of students and not for individual students and which differs in other fundamental ways from almost all state and local tests.

Thus, we have reached two principal conclusions:

Comparing the full array of currently administered commercial and state achievement tests to one another, through the development of a single equivalency or linking scale, is not feasible.

Reporting individual student scores from the full array of state and commercial achievement

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 1998. Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9525.
×

tests on the NAEP scale, and transforming individual scores on these various tests and assessment into the NAEP achievement levels is not feasible.

This interim report synthesizes the committee's review of empirical evidence that supports our conclusions. The final report will provide additional detail on the diverse landscape of educational testing in the United States, the special problems of establishing valid linkages with NAEP, and the implications of prior and ongoing research on technical aspects of linkage and equivalency. The final report will also consider the possibility of establishing criteria with which to evaluate the feasibility of linking subsets of the diverse and increasing number of tests currently used in the nation's schools.

Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 1998. Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9525.
×
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Executive Summary." National Research Council. 1998. Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9525.
×
Page 2
Next: Introduction »
Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests: Interim Report Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!