References

Achieve, Inc. (About Achieve.) Available electronically at http://www.achieve.org, [March 1]1998.

Afflerbach, P.A. 1995 Content validation of the 1994 NAEP in reading: Classifying items according to the reading framework. In Assessment in Transition: 1994 Trial State Assessment Report on Reading: Background Studies, R. Linn, R. Glaser, and G. Bohrnstedt, eds. Stanford, CA: The National Academy of Education.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. 1985 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education.

Beaton, A.E., and E.J. Gonzalez 1993 Comparing the NAEP trial assessment results with the IAEP international results. In The Trial State Assessment: Prospects and Realities: Background Studies 1993. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

1995 The NAEP Primer. Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

Behuniak, Peter, and Charlene Tucker 1992 The potential of criterion-referenced tests with projected norms. Applied Measurement in Education 5(4):337-353.

Bloxom, Bruce, Peter J. Pashley, W. Alan Nicewander, and Duanli Yan 1996 Linking to a large-scale assessment: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 20 (Spring):1-26.

Bond, Linda A. 1995 Norm-Referenced Testing and Criterion-Referenced Testing: The Difference in Purpose, Content, and Interpretation of Results. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Bond, Linda, Edward Roeber, and David Braskamp 1997 Trends in State Student Assessment Programs: Fall 1996. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Bond, Lloyd, and Richard M. Jaeger 1993 Judged Congruence Between Various State Assessment Tests in Mathematics and the 1990 National Assessment of Educational Progress Item Pool for Grade-8 Mathematics. Center for Educational Research and Evaluation. Greensboro NC: University of North Carolina.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 33
EQUIVALENCY AND LINKAGE OF EDUCATIONAL TESTS: INTERIM REPORT References Achieve, Inc. (About Achieve.) Available electronically at http://www.achieve.org, [March 1]1998. Afflerbach, P.A. 1995 Content validation of the 1994 NAEP in reading: Classifying items according to the reading framework. In Assessment in Transition: 1994 Trial State Assessment Report on Reading: Background Studies, R. Linn, R. Glaser, and G. Bohrnstedt, eds. Stanford, CA: The National Academy of Education. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. 1985 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Beaton, A.E., and E.J. Gonzalez 1993 Comparing the NAEP trial assessment results with the IAEP international results. In The Trial State Assessment: Prospects and Realities: Background Studies 1993. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education. 1995 The NAEP Primer. Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. Behuniak, Peter, and Charlene Tucker 1992 The potential of criterion-referenced tests with projected norms. Applied Measurement in Education 5(4):337-353. Bloxom, Bruce, Peter J. Pashley, W. Alan Nicewander, and Duanli Yan 1996 Linking to a large-scale assessment: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 20 (Spring):1-26. Bond, Linda A. 1995 Norm-Referenced Testing and Criterion-Referenced Testing: The Difference in Purpose, Content, and Interpretation of Results. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Bond, Linda, Edward Roeber, and David Braskamp 1997 Trends in State Student Assessment Programs: Fall 1996. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Bond, Lloyd, and Richard M. Jaeger 1993 Judged Congruence Between Various State Assessment Tests in Mathematics and the 1990 National Assessment of Educational Progress Item Pool for Grade-8 Mathematics. Center for Educational Research and Evaluation. Greensboro NC: University of North Carolina.

OCR for page 33
EQUIVALENCY AND LINKAGE OF EDUCATIONAL TESTS: INTERIM REPORT Campbell, J.R., P.L. Donahue, C.M. Reese, and G.W. Phillips 1994 NAEP 1994 Reading Report Card for the Nation and the States. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Educational Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Ercikan, Kadriye 1997 Linking statewide tests to the NAEP: Accuracy of combining test results across states. Applied Measurement in Education 10(2):145-159. Feldt, L.S., and R.L. Brennan 1989 Reliability. In Educational Measurement, Third Edition, R.L. Linn, ed. New York: MacMillian Publishing Company. Frederiksen, J.R., and A. Collins 1989 A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher 18(9):27-32. Haertel, E.H. 1996 Test linking and comparability. In Proceedings from the California Comparability Symposium, September 1997. Los Angeles, CA: County Office of Education. Holland, Paul W., and D.B. Rubin, eds. 1982 Test Equating. New York: Academic Press. Jaeger, Richard M. 1996 Content Congruence as a Factor in the Linking of State Assessments to NAEP. Paper presented at the Council of Chief State School Officers Large-Scale Assessment Conference June 23-26, Phoenix, AZ. University of North Carolina, Greensboro. Johnson, Eugene 1998 Linking the National Assessment of Educational Progress and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study for Eighth Grade: A Research Report. National Center for Education Statistics, Publication No. NCES 98-499. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Johnson, E.G., and J. Mazzeo 1998 Linking the Voluntary National Test with NAEP and TIMSS. Paper presented at the NCME Invited Session on Measurement Issues on the Voluntary National Tests, San Diego, CA. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ. Jones, Lyle V. 1997 National Tests and Educational Reform: Are They Compatible? Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ 08541. Kenney, Patricia Ann, and Edward Silver 1997 Content Analysis Project — State and NAEP Mathematics Assessment. Proposal Summary. Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh . Kiplinger, V.L., and R.L. Linn 1996 Raising the stakes of test administration: The impact on student performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Educational Assessment 3(2):111-133. Kolen, Michael J., and Robert L. Brennan 1995 Test Equating: Methods and Practices. New York: Springer-Verlag. Koretz, Daniel 1998 Evidence Pertaining to the Validity of Score Gains on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Paper presented at the Symposium. Establishing Meaning: Validity Evidence for the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS), at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, April 16, San Diego, CA. RAND, Washington, DC. Koretz, Daniel, R.L. Linn, S. Dunbar, and L. Shepard 1991 The Effects of High-Stakes Testing on Achievement: Preliminary Findings About Generalization Across Tests. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, April, Chicago, IL. RAND, Washington, DC. Linn, Robert L. 1975 Anchor test study: Final report; project report, and volumes 1 through 30. Anchor test study supplement, final report. Journal of Educational Measurement 12(3):201-214. 1993 Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education 6(1):83-102. Linn, Robert L., and V.L. Kiplinger 1995 Linking statewide tests to the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Stability of Results. Applied Measurement in Education 8(2):135-156.

OCR for page 33
EQUIVALENCY AND LINKAGE OF EDUCATIONAL TESTS: INTERIM REPORT Linn, R.L., L. Shepard, and E. Hartka 1992 The relative standing of states in the 1990 trial state assessment: The influence of choice of content, statistics, and subpopulation breakdowns in Studies for the Evaluation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress Trial State Assessment. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education. Loret, Peter. G., A. Seder, J.C. Bianchini, and C.A. Vale 1972 A Description of the Anchor Test Study. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. 1975 Equivalence and Norms Tables for Selected Reading Achievement Tests (Grades 4, 5, and 6). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Los Angeles County Office of Education 1997 Proceedings from the California Comparability Symposium, September 1997. Los Angeles, CA: County Office of Education. McDonnell, Lorraine 1997 The Politics of State Testing: Implementing New Student Assessments . CESE Technical Report 424. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. McLaughlin, Don 1998 Study of the Linkages of 1996 NAEP and State Mathematics Assessments in Four States. Final Report. John C. Flanagan Research Center Education Statistics Services Institute, American Institutes for Research. American Institutes for Research, Palo Alto, CA. McLaughlin, Milbrey W., Lorrie A. Shepard, and Jennifer A. O'Day 1995 Improving Education Through Standards-Based Reform. Standard, CA: National Academy of Education. Messick, Samuel 1989 Validity. In Educational Measurement, Third edition, R.L. Linn, ed. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company. Mislevy, R.J. 1992 Linking Educational Assessments: Concepts, Issues, Methods, and Prospects . Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Mislevy, R.J., and A.E. Beaton, B. Kaplan, and K.M. Sheehan 1992 Estimating population characteristics from sparse matrix sample of item responses. Journal of Educational Measurement 29:131-154. National Center for Education Statistics 1998 Linking the National Assessment of Educational Progress and the Third International Mathematics and Science Study: Eighth Grade Results . Eugene Johnson and Adriane Siegendorf, NCES 98-500. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Research Council 1996 Evaluation of “Redesigning the National Assessment of Educational Progress.” Committee on the Evaluation of NAEP, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, Washington, DC. 1997 Education One and All: Students with Disabilities and Standards-Based Reform. Lorraine M. McConnell, Margaret J. McLaughlin, and Patricia Morison, eds. Committee on Goals 2000 and the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. O'Neil, H.F., B. Sugrue, J. Abedi, E. Baker, and S. Golen 1992 Final Report of Experimental Studies on Motivation and NAEP Test Performance. Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing . Pashley, Peter, Gary Phillips, et al. 1993 Toward World-Class Standards: A Research Study Linking International and National Assessments. Center for Educational Progress. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Peterson, Nancy S., Michael J. Kolen, H.D. Hoover, et al. 1989 Scaling, norming, and equating. Pp. 221-262 in Educational Measurement, Third edition, R.L. Linn, ed. New York: McMillan. Roeber, Edward, Linda Bond, and David Braskamp 1997 Annual Survey of State Student Assessment Programs. Fall 1996. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Rose, L.C., A.M. Gallup, and S.M. Elam 1997 The 29th annual Phi Delta Kappan/Gallup Poll of the public's attitude toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan 79(1):41-56.

OCR for page 33
EQUIVALENCY AND LINKAGE OF EDUCATIONAL TESTS: INTERIM REPORT Shavelson, R.J., G.P. Baxter, and J. Pine 1992 Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality . Educational Measurement 21(4):22-27. Shepard, L. 1994 The challenges of assessing young children appropriately. Phi Delta Kappan 76(3):206-210. Shepard, L.A., R.J. Flexer, E.H. Hiebert, and S.F. Marion 1996 Effects of introducing classroom performance assessments on student learning. Educational Measurement Issues and Practices 15(3):7-18. Shepard, L.A., and K.C. Dougherty 1991 Effects of High Stakes Testing on Instruction. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association/National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL. University of Colorado, Boulder. Smith, Marshall S., David L. Stevenson, and Christine P. Li 1998 Voluntary national tests would improve education. Education Leadership (March):42-44. U.S. Congress, U.S. Office of Technology Assessment 1992 Testing in American Schools: Asking the Right Questions. OTA-SET-519, February 1992. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Department of Education 1997 The NAEP Guide. J. Calderone, L.M. King, and N. Harkay, eds. National Center for Education Statistics. NCES 97-990. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. U.S. Department of Education 1998 Linking the NAEP and the TIMSS: Eighth Grade Results. Eugene Johnson and Adriane Siegendorf. Project Officer, Gary Phillips, National Center for Education Statistics. NCES 98-500. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Valencia, S.W., and K.H. Au 1997 Portfolios across educational contests: Issues of evaluation, teacher development, and system validity. Educational Assessment 4(1):1-35. Waltman, Kristie K. 1997 Using performance standards to link statewide achievement results to NAEP. Journal of Educational Measurement 34(2):101-121. Webb, N.M. 1995 Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17:239-261. Williams, Valerie, Kathleen Billeaud, Lori Davis, David Thissen, and Eleanor Sanford 1995 Projecting to the NAEP Scale: Results from the North Carolina End-of-Grade Testing Program. Technical Report &34. Chapel Hill, NC: National Institute of Statistical Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Wilson, Mark. 1996 The California Comparability Study. In Proceedings from the California Comparability Symposium, September 1997. Los Angeles, CA: County Office of Education. Wu, Grace, Mark Royal, and Don McLaughlin 1997 Development of a SASS 1993-94 School-Level Student Achievement Subfile: Using State Assessments and State NAEP. Feasibility Study. Education Statistics Services Institute, American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC. Yen, Wendy 1996 Linking Tests for AB 265. In Proceedings from the California Comparability Symposium, September 1997. Los Angeles, CA: County Office of Education. 1998 Linking Assessment to NAEP and Providing Individual Student Scores: . Paper presented to the Committee on Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests, March. Yen, Wendy, and Steven Ferrara 1997 The Maryland School Performance Assessment Performance Program: Performance assessment with psychometric quality suitable for high stakes usage . Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement 57( 1):60-84.