The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
tively appropriate in that it provides a broader range of expertise than would be available if decisions were made with input only from scientists and managers. The perspectives of scientists and managers are essential, but other interested parties can offer additional information needed for good decisions, particularly about values. Finally, analytic deliberation processes are instrumentally appropriate in that such a process can help to build trust and understanding and, even when disagreement persists, clarifies the basis of disagreement.
Bagley CB 1916. History of Seattle from earliest settlement to the present time. Chicago IL: SJ Clarke.
Chess C, Dietz T, Shannon M. 1998. Who should deliberate when? Hum Ecol Rev 5:45–8.
Chess C, Hance BJ. 1994. Communicating with the public: ten questions environmental managers should ask. New Brunswick NJ: Center for Environmental Communication, Rutgers University.
Chess C, Purcell K. 1997. Public participation and the environment: do we know what works? New Brunswick NJ: The Center for Environmental Communication, Rutgers Univ.
Cvetkovich G, Earle TC. 1994. The construction of justice: a case study of public participation in land management. J Social Iss 50:161–78.
Dietz T. 1987. Theory and method in social impact assessment. Sociolog Inq 57:54–69.
Dietz T, Frey RS, and others. 1993. Risk, technology and society? In: Dunlap RE, Michelson W. Handbook of environmental sociology. Westport CT: Greenwood Pr.
Dietz T, Pfund A. 1988. An impact identification method for development program evaluation. Policy Stud Rev 8:137–45.