References

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Blueprints for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for All Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). This Year in School Science 1990: Assessment in the Service of Instruction. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

American Psychological Association and Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory. (1993). Learner-Centered Psychological Principles: Guidelines for School Redesign and Reform. Denver: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory.

Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Teaching Science. In Koehler-Richardson (Ed), Educators’ Handbook: A Research Perspective (pp. 84-111). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Anderson, R. D. (1996). Study of Curriculum Reform. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Atkin, J. M., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or Invention. The Science Teacher, 29(2), 121-143.

Atwater, B. F. (1987). Evidence for Great Holocene Earthquakes Along the Outer Coast of Washington State. Science, 236, 942-944.

Baron, J. B. (1990). Performance Assessment: Blurring the Edges among Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction. In A. B. Champagne, B. E. Lovitts, & B. J. Calinger (Eds), Assessment in the Service of Instruction: This Year in School Science 1990. Washington, DC: AAAS.

Basaga, H., Geban, O., & Tekkaya, C. (1994). The Effect of the Inquiry Teaching Method on Biochemistry and Science Process Skill Achievements. Biochemical Education, 22(1), 29-32.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.

Blank, R. (Chair, CCSSO/SCASS Science Team for Measures of the Enacted Curriculum). (1997). How is Science Taught in Schools? Washington, DC: CCSSO.

Blumenfeld, P. C. (1994). Lessons Learned: How Collaboration Helped Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-based Instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 539-551.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R., (Eds). (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Bredderman, T. (1982). Elementary School Science Process Programs: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Studies. (Final Report of NSF-RISE Grant SED 18717).



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 153
References American Association for the Advancement of Baron, J. B. (1990). Performance Assess- Science. (1998). Blueprints for Science ment: Blurring the Edges among Assess- Literacy. New York: Oxford University ment, Curriculum, and Instruction. In A. Press. B. Champagne, B. E. Lovitts, & B. J. American Association for the Advancement of Calinger (Eds), Assessment in the Service of Science. (1989). Science for All Americans. Instruction: This Year in School Science Washington, DC: American Association for 1990. Washington, DC: AAAS. the Advancement of Science. Basaga, H., Geban, O., & Tekkaya, C. (1994). American Association for the Advancement of The Effect of the Inquiry Teaching Method Science. (1990). This Year in School on Biochemistry and Science Process Skill Achievements. Biochemical Education, Science 1990: Assessment in the Service of Instruction. Washington, DC: American 22(1), 29-32. Association for the Advancement of Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment Science. and Classroom Learning. Assessment in American Psychological Association and Mid- Education, 5(1), 7-74. Continent Regional Educational Labora- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the tory. (1993). Learner-Centered Psychologi- Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, cal Principles: Guidelines for School Redesign and Reform. Denver: 80(2), 139-148. Mid-Continent Regional Educational Blank, R. (Chair, CCSSO/SCASS Science Laboratory. Team for Measures of the Enacted Anderson, C. W., & Smith, E. L. (1987). Curriculum). (1997). How is Science Teaching Science. In Koehler-Richardson Taught in Schools? Washington, DC: (Ed), Educators’ Handbook: A Research CCSSO. Perspective (pp. 84-111). White Plains, NY: Blumenfeld, P. C. (1994). Lessons Learned: Longman. How Collaboration Helped Middle Grade Anderson, R. D. (1996). Study of Curriculum Science Teachers Learn Project-based Reform. Washington DC: U.S. Govern- Instruction. The Elementary School ment Printing Office. Journal, 94(5), 539-551. Atkin, J. M., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discov- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R., ery or Invention. The Science Teacher, (Eds). (1999). How People Learn: Brain, 29(2), 121-143. Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, Atwater, B. F. (1987). Evidence for Great DC: National Academy Press. Holocene Earthquakes Along the Outer Bredderman, T. (1982). Elementary School Coast of Washington State. Science, 236, Science Process Programs: A Meta-analysis 942-944. of Evaluation Studies. (Final Report of NSF-RISE Grant SED 18717). 153 REFERENCES

OCR for page 153
Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for Thought. Delpit, L. (1995). Other People’s Children: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. New Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving Scientific York: W.W. Norton. Dewey, J. [1933 (1910)]. How We Think. Literary: From Purposes to Practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. (1993). Goals Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & for the Science Curriculum. In Handbook Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds). (1999). How of Research on Science Teaching and People Learn: Bridging Research and Learning. Washington, DC: National Practice. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association. Academy Press. Byrnes, J. P. (1996). Cognitive Development Driver, R., Guesni, E., & Tiberghiem, A. (1985). Children’s Ideas in Science. and Learning in Instructional Contexts. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Calhoun, E. F. (1994). How to Use Action Driver, R., Squires, A., Duck, P., & Wood- Robinson, V. (1994). Making Sense of Research in the Self-Renewing School. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervi- Secondary Sciences: Research into sion and Curriculum Development. Children’s Ideas. London: Routledge. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. Duckworth, E. (1987). The Having of (1996). Cognitively Guided Instruction: A Wonderful Ideas and Other Essays on Knowledge Base for Reform in Primary Teaching and Learning. New York: Mathematics Instruction. Elementary Teachers College Press, Columbia School Journal, 97(1), 3-20. University. Champagne, A. B., Kouba, V. L., & Hurley, M. Duschl, R. A. (1992). Teaching of Theory: A (In press). Assessing Inquiry. Albany, NY: Guiding Concept in Science Education. State University of New York. Chapter IX in Teaching About the History Cochran, K. F. (1992) Pedagogical content and Nature of Science and Technology: knowledge: Teachers’ Transformations of Background Papers. Colorado Springs: Subject Matter. In F. Lawrenz, K. Cochran, Biological Sciences Curriculum Study J. Krajcik, & P. Simpson (Eds), Research (BSCS). Matters…To the Science Teacher. Mono- Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1991). graph Number Five of the National Epistemological Perspectives on Concep- Association of Research in Science tual Change: Implications for Educational Teaching. Practice. Journal of Research in Science Council of Chief State School Officers. Teaching, 28(9), 839-858. (1999). Guide to Scoring LEP Student Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Responses to Open-Ended Science Items. Washington, DC: SCASS LEP Consortium Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Project, CCSSO. Science Classrooms. Educational Assess- Daro, P. (1996). Standards and Portfolio ment, 4(1), 37-73. Assessment . In J. B. Baron & D. P. Wolf Flick, L. B. (1995). Complex Classrooms: A (Eds), Performance-Based Student Assess- Synthesis of Research on Inquiry Teaching ment: Challenges and Possibilities (pp. 239- Methods and Explicit Teaching Strategies. 260). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Paper presented at the annual meeting of Press. the National Association of Research in De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Science Teaching, San Francisco (ED 383 Scientific Discovery Learning with 563). Computer Simulations of Conceptual Fradd, S. H., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers’ Domains. Review of Educational Research, Roles in Promoting Science Inquiry with 68(2), 179-201. Students from Diverse Language Back- DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A History of Ideas in grounds. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 14-42. Science Education: Implications for Practice. New York: Teachers College Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change Forces: Press, Columbia University. Probing the Depths of Education Reform. New York: The Falmer Press. 154 I N Q U I R Y A N D T H E N AT I O N A L S C I E N C E E D U C AT I O N S TA N D A R D S

OCR for page 153
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The New Meaning of Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationship Between Educational Change. New York: Teachers Research and the NCTM Standards. College Press. Journal for Research in Mathematics Gallas, K. (1995). Talking Their Way Into Education, 30(1), 3-19. Holly, P. (1991). Action Research: The Science: Hearing Children’s Questions and Theories, Responding with Curricula. New Missing Link in the Creation of Schools as York: Teachers College Press. Centers of Inquiry. In A. Lieberman & L. Gitomer, D. H., & Duschl, R. A. (1995). Miller (Eds), Staff Development for Moving Toward a Portfolio Culture in Education in the ’90s: New Demands, New Science Education. In M. S. Glynn & R. Realities, New Perspectives (pp. 133-157). Duit (Eds), Learning Science in the Schools: New York: Teachers College Press. Research Reforming Practice (pp. 299-325). Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Huling- Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Austin, L., & Hall, G. E. (1987). Taking Glaser, R. (1992). Expert Knowledge and Charge of Change. Alexandria, VA: Process of Thinking. In D. F. Halpern Association for Supervision and Curricu- (Ed), Enhancing Thinking Skills in Science lum Development. and Mathematics (pp. 63-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Huberman, A. M. & Miles, M. B. (1984). Erlbaum. Innovation Up Close: How School Improve- Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff Development and ment Works. New York: Plenum. the Process of Teacher Change. Educa- Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific Literacy: New tional Researcher, 15(5), 5-12. Minds for a Changing World. Science Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in Education, 82, 407-416. Schools: Facilitating the Process. Albany: Joyce, B. (Ed). (1990). Changing School State University of New York Press. Culture Through Staff Development, 1990 Harms, N., & Kahl, S. (1980). Project Yearbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Synthesis: Final Report to The National Science Foundation. Boulder, CO: Univer- Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., sity of Colorado. & Soloway, E. (1994). A Collaborative Harms, N., & Yager, R. E. (1981). What Model for Helping Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-based Instruction. Research Says to the Science Teacher, Vol. 3. Washington, DC: National Science The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), Teachers Association. 483-497. Hashweh, M. Z. (1987) Effects of Subject Ladewski, B. J., Krajcik, J. S., & Harvey, C. L. Matter Knowledge in the Teaching of (1994). A Middle Grade Science Teacher’s Biology and Physics. Teaching and Emerging Understanding of Project-based Teacher Education, 3, 109-120. Instruction. The Elementary School Haury, D. L. (1993). Teaching Science Journal, 94(5), 499-515. Through Inquiry. ERIC CSMEE Digest Layman, J. W., Ochoa, G., & Heikkinen, H. (March Ed 359 048). (1996). Inquiry and Learning: Realizing Herbart, J. (1901). Outlines of Education Science Standards in the Classroom. New Doctrine, C. DeGarmo (Trans); A. Lange York: College Entrance Examination (Ed). New York: Macmillan. Board. Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (Eds). (1991). Conditions of Conceptual Change in the Staff Development for Education in the ’90s: Classroom. International Journal of New Demands, New Realities, New Science Education, 11(5), 541-553. Perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Teach- Heywood, J., & Heywood, S. (1992). The ers College Press. Training of Student-Teachers in Discovery Linn, M. C., Clement, C., Pulos, S., & Methods of Instruction and Learning. (No. Sullivan, P. (1989). Scientific Reasoning in 1/92) ED 358 034. Dublin, Ireland: Adolescence: The Influence of Instruction Department of Teacher Education, The in Science Knowledge and Reasoning University of Dublin. Strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(2), 171-187. 155 REFERENCES

OCR for page 153
Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ Professional Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the At-Rest Development in a Climate of Educational Condition of an Object. The Physics Reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Teacher, 20, 10. Analysis, 15, 129-151. Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching Science Lloyd, C. V. (1988). The Relationship for Understanding. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds), Toward the Thinking Between Scientific Literacy and High School Biology Textbooks. Paper presented at the Curriculum: Current Cognitive Research annual meeting of the National Reading (pp. 129-149). Alexandria, VA: Conference, Austin, TX. Association for Supervision and Curricu- Lott, G. W. (1983). The Effect of Inquiry lum Development. Teaching and Advance Organizers upon Minstrell, J. (1992). Facets of Students’ Student Outcomes in Science Education. Knowledge and Relevant Instruction. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds), Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 437-451. Proceedings of the International Workshop Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., on Research in Physics Education: Theoreti- & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing Profes- cal Issues and Empirical Studies (pp. 110- 128). Kiel, Germany: Instituit fur die sional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Padagogik de Naturiwissenshaften. Corwin Press, Inc. Narode, R. (1987). Teaching Thinking Skills. Malley, M. (1992). The Nature and History NEA Professional Library. Washington, of Science. Chapter V in Teaching About DC: National Education Association. National Commission for Teaching & the History and Nature of Science and Technology: Background Papers (pp. 67-80). America’s Future. (1996). What Matters Colorado Springs: Biological Sciences Most: Teaching for America’s Future. New Curriculum Study (BSCS). York: Author. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., National Research Council. (1990). Fulfilling Blunk, M., Crawford, B. Kelley, B., & the Promise: Biology Education in the Meyer, K. M. (1994). Enacting Project- Nation’s Schools. Washington, DC: Based Science: Experiences of Four National Academy Press. Middle Grade Teachers. The Elementary National Research Council. (1996). The School Journal, 94(5), 517-538. National Science Education Standards. Mayer, W. (1978). Biology Teacher’s Hand- Washington DC: National Academy Press. book (3rd ed.). Colorado Springs: Biologi- National Research Council. (1997). Science cal Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). Teaching Reconsidered. A Handbook. McDermott, L. C., & the Physics Education Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Group at the University of Washington. National Research Council. (1999a). (1996). Physics by Inquiry (Volumes I & II). Designing Mathematics and Science New York: John Wiley. Curriculum Programs: A Guide for Using McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Mathematics and Science Education Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Educa- Standards. Washington, DC: National tion Research. American Journal of Physics Academy Press. 67(10), 755-767. National Research Council. (1999b). Mechling, K. R., & Oliver, D. L. (1983). Selecting Instructional Materials: A Guide for K-12 Science. Washington, DC: Promoting Science Among Elementary School Principals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Science Teachers Association. Neill, D. M., & Medina, N. J. (1989). Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond Standardized Testing: Harmful to Educa- Process. Studies in Science Education, 14, tional Health. Phi Delta Kappan 70(9), 33-62. 688-697. Miller, D. M., & Pine, G. J. (1990). Advanc- Nelson, A. R., Atwater, B. F., Bobrowsky, P. T., ing Professional Inquiry for Educational Bradley, L. A., Clague, J. J., Carver, G. A., Improvement Through Action Research. Darienzo, M. E., Grant, W. C., Krueger, Journal of Staff Development, 11(3), 56-61. H. W., Sparks, R., Stafford, T. W., & Stuiver, 156 I N Q U I R Y A N D T H E N AT I O N A L S C I E N C E E D U C AT I O N S TA N D A R D S

OCR for page 153
M. (1995). Radiocarbon Evidence for Sciences, 2(1), 61-94. Extensive Plate-boundary Rupture about Rowe, M. B. (1991). Implications of the New 300 Years Ago at the Cascadia Subduction Science Curricula. In S. M. Malcom & G. Zone. Nature, 378, 371-374. Kulum (Eds), Science Assessment in the New Standards Project. (1997). New Service of Reform. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement Standards Performance Standards. Washington, DC: National Center on of Science (now published by Lawrence Education and the Economy. Erlbaum). Novak, J. D. (1987). Proceedings of the Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables, Their Influence Second International Seminar: Misconcep- on Language, Logic, and Fate Control: tions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (Volumes I-III) . Ithaca, Part One - Wait Time. Journal of Research NY: Cornell University. in Science Teaching, 11, 81-94. O’Day, J., & Smith, M. (1993). Systemic Satake, K., Shimazaki, K., Tsuji, Y., & Ueda, Reform and Educational Opportunity. In S. K. (1996). Time and Size of a Giant H. Fuhrman (Ed), Designing Coherent Earthquake in Cascadia Inferred from Japanese Tsunami Record of January 1700. Education Policy: Improving the System (pp. 312-322). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Nature, 379, 246-249. Piaget, J. (1975). The Development of Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. Thought. New York: Viking Press. A. (1997). Splintered Vision: An Investiga- Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The tion of U.S. Science and Mathematics Psychology of the Child. New York: Basic Education. Boston: Kluwer Academic Books. Publishers. Prather, J. P. (1996). The Role of the School Schwab, J. (1960). What Do Scientists Do? Principal in Science Education Reform. In Behavioral Science, 5(1). J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds), Issues in Schwab, J. (1966). The Teaching of Science. Science Education. Arlington, VA: Na- Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. tional Science Teachers Association and Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M.A., Bakken, J. National Science Education Leadership P., & Brigham, F. J. (1993). Reading Association. Versus Doing: The Relative Effects of Project Kaleidoscope. (1991). What Works: Textbook-based and Inquiry-oriented Approaches to Science Learning in Special Building National Science Communities, Education Classrooms. The Journal of Strengthening Undergraduate Science and Mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. Special Education, 27(1), 1-15. Raizen, S. A., & Kaser, J. S. (1989). Assess- Secules, T., Cottom, C. D., Bray, M. H., ing Science Learning in Elementary Miller, L. D., & The Cognition and School: Why, What, and How? Phi Delta Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). Kappan, 70(9), 718-722. Schools for Thought: Creating Learning Resnick, L. B., Bill, V. L., Lesgold, S. B., & Communities. Educational Leadership, Leer, M. N. (1991). Thinking in Arith- 54(6), 56-60. metic Class. In B. Means, C. Chelemer, & Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Under- M. S. Knapp (Eds), Teaching Advanced stand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Skills to At Risk Students (pp. 27-53). San Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Shymansky, J. A., Hedges, L. V., & Roberts, L., Wilson, M., & Draney, K. Woodworth, G. (1990). A Reassessment of (1997). The SEPUP Assessment System: the Effects of Inquiry-based Science An Overview. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Curriculum of the ’60s on Student Perfor- Evaluation and Assessment Research mance. Journal of Research in Science Center. Teaching, 27, 127-144. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. C., & Alport, J. M. (1992). Appropriating Scientific Discourse: (1983). The Effects of New Science Findings from Language Minority Class- Curricula on Student Performance. rooms. The Journal of the Learning Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387-404. 157 REFERENCES

OCR for page 153
Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Do Students’ Views of Science Influence 19(6), 511-522. Knowledge Integration? Journal of Weiss, I. R. (1978). Report of the 1977 Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), National Survey of Science, Mathematics, 761-784. and Social Studies Education. Washington, Stake, R. E., & Easley, J. A. (1978). Case DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Studies in Science Education. Urbana, IL: Weiss, I. R. (1987). Report of the 1985-1986 Center for Institutional Research and National Survey of Science and Mathemat- Curriculum Evaluation, University of ics Education. Research Triangle Park, Illinois. NC: Research Triangle Institute. Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The Inquiry, Modeling and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118. Methods and Findings from an Exploratory White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (In press). Research Project on Eighth-Grade Math- Metacognitive Facilitation: An Approach to ematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Making Scientific Inquiry Accessible to All. Government Printing Office. In J. Minstrell & E. Van Zee (Eds), Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, Teaching in the Inquiry-Based Science J. D. (1994). Research on Alternative Classroom. Washington, DC: American Conceptions in Science. In D. L. Gabel Association for the Advancement of (Ed), Handbook of Research on Science Science. Teaching and Learning (pp. 177-210). New Wise, K. C., & Okey, J. R. (1983). A Meta- York: Macmillan. analysis of the Effects of Various Science Weinstein, T., Boulanger, F. D., & Walberg, H. Teaching Strategies on Achievement. J. (1982). Science Curriculum Effects in Journal of Research in Science Teaching, High School: A Quantitative Synthesis. 20(5), 419-435. 158 I N Q U I R Y A N D T H E N AT I O N A L S C I E N C E E D U C AT I O N S TA N D A R D S