References
AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 1989. Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/tools/sfaaol/sfaatoc.htm
AAAS. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/tools/benchol/bolframe.html
AAAS. 1997. Resources for Science Literacy: Professional Development. New York: Oxford University Press. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/tools/rsl/index.html
AAAS. Forthcoming [a]. Designs for Science Literacy. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/tools/designs/index.html
AAAS. Forthcoming [b]. Middle Grades Science Textbooks: A Benchmarks-based Evaluation.
AAAS. Forthcoming [c]. Resources for Science Literacy: Curriculum Materials Evaluation. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/tools/rslcme/index.html
Brearton, M.A., and S. Shuttleworth. 1999. Racing a comet. Journal of Staff Development winter:30-33. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/newsinfo/research/articles/nsdc_jsd.htm
Brooks, J.G., and M.G. Brooks. 1993. In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bush, W.S., G. Kulm, and D. Surati. Forthcoming. Preparing teachers for mathematics textbook selection.
Bybee, R.W. Ed. 1996. National Standards and the Science Curriculum: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Bybee, R.W. 1997. Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. N.H.: Heinemann.
CBEDS (California Basic Educational Data System). 1997. California Public School Enrollment. Sacramento: Educational Demographics Unit, California Department of Education.
CCSSO (Council of Chief State School Officers). 1997. Mathematics and science content standards and curriculum frameworks: States' progress on development and implementation. Internet address: http://www.ccsso.org
Celebuski, C. 1998. Status of Education Reform in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools: Principal's Perspective. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
Chubb, J. 1999. Interview about the Edison Project with its director of curriculum and assessment, March 10, 1999.
CPRE (Consortium for Policy Research in Education). 1996. Tracking student achievement in science and math: The promise of state assessment programs. Policy brief RB-17-July 1996, pp. 4-5. Internet address: http://www.upenn.edu/gse/cpre/frames/pubs.html
DoEd (U.S. Department of Education). 1997a. Assessment of student performance: Studies of education reform. Internet address: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/SER/ASP/
DoEd. 1997b. Attaining Excellence: Guidebook to Examine School Curricula. Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
DoEd. 1997c. Guidelines for Submitting Science Programs for Review. Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Fullan, M. 1991. The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hutchinson, J., and M. Huberman. 1993. Knowledge dissemination and use in science and mathematics education: A literature review. Prepared for the Directorate of Education and Human Resources, Division of Research, Evaluation and Dissemination, National Science Foundation by The Network. Docu-
ment nsf9375. Internet address:: http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9375
IMF (Instructional Materials Fund). 1989. Policy (K-8), California Education Code Section 60242(b) (1989, amd. 1998).
James, C. 1999. Interview with former science teacher, Saint Patrick's Episcopal Day School, Washington, D.C., March 1999.
Kesidou, S. 1999. Producing analytical reports on curriculum materials in science: Findings from Project 2061's 1998 curriculum review study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Boston, Mass., March 28-31.
Kulm, G, and L. Grier. 1998. Mathematics curriculum materials reliability study. Washington, D.C.: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Lee, O., D.C. Eichinger, C.W. Anderson, G.D. Berkheimer, and T.S. Blakeslee. 1993. Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30:249-70.
Little, J.W. 1993. Teachers' Professional Development and Education Reform. CPRE Policy Brief No. RB-11-10/93, pp. 1-7. Internet address: http://www.upenn.edu/gse/cpre/frames/pubs.html
Loucks-Horsley, S., K. Stiles, and P. Hewson. 1996. Principles of Effective Professional Development for Mathematics and Science Education. NISE Policy Briefs, vol 1, no. 1. Madison, Wisc.: National Institute for Science Education. Internet address: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/Publications/Briefs/default.html
McArthur Parker, C. 1999. Interview with chemistry teacher, Edmund Burke School, Washington, D.C., March 1999.
Massell, D., M. Kirst, and M. Hoppe. 1997. Persistence and Change: Standards-based Systemic Reform in Nine States. Consortium for Policy Research in Education Policy Brief No. RB-21-March 1997. Internet address: http://www.upenn.edu/gse/cpre/frames/pubs.html
NCEE (National Commission of Excellence in Education). 1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 1998a. Facing the Consequences: Using TIMSS for a Closer Look at United States Mathematics and Science Education. London: Kluwer Academic.
NCES. 1998b. NAEP 1996 Science Cross-state Data Compendium for the Grade 8 Assessment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
NEGP (National Education Goals Panel). 1998. Mathematics and Science Achievement State by State (1998). Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1998. Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Internet address: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5787.html
NRC (National Research Council). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Internet address: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/4962.html
NRC. 1997a. Introducing the National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Internet address: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5704.html
NRC. 1997b. Science Teacher Preparation in an Era of Standards-based Reform. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Internet address: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9078.html
NRC. 1998. Every Child a Scientist: Achieving Scientific Literacy for All. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Internet address: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/6005.html
NRC. 1999a. Designing Mathematics or Science Curriculum Programs: A Guide for Using Mathematics and Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NRC. 1999b. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Internet address: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6160.html
NRC. Forthcoming. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NSB (National Science Board). 1998. Failing Our Children: Implications of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation.
Internet address: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/1998/nsb98154/nsb98154.htm
NSB. 1999. Preparing our Children: Math and Science Education in the National Interest. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation. Internet address: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/1999/nsb9931/nsb9931.htm
NSF (National Science Foundation). 1997. Review of Instructional Materials for Middle School Science. Document number NSF 97 54. Washington, D.C.: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of Elementary, Secondary and Informal Education. Internet address: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf9754/nsf9754.htm>.
NSRC (National Science Resources Center). 1988. Science for Children: Resources for Teachers . Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
NSRC. 1996. Resources for Teaching Elementary School Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Internet address: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/4966.html
NSRC. 1998. Resources for Teaching Middle School Science. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Internet address: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/5774.html
Ohio Systemic Initiative. 1998. The NSES-based Inventory of Middle Level Science Curriculum Study. Internet address: http://www.discovery.k12.oh.us/nses/nses.html>
Orpwood, G. 1998. The logic of advice and deliberation: Making sense of science curriculum talk. In Problems of Meaning in Science Curriculum, eds., D.A. Roberts and L. Östman, pp. 133-49. New York: Teachers College Press.
Roseman, J.E. 1997a. Lessons from Project 2061: Practical ways to implement benchmarks and standards. The Science Teacher 64(1):26-29. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/newsinfo/research/roseman/roseman1.html
Roseman, J.E. 1997b. The Project 2061 curriculum-analysis procedure. In Attaining Excellence: Guidebook to Examine School Curricula, ed. M.E. McNeely, pp. 125-40. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/newsinfo/research/enc/enctims.htm
Roseman, J.E., S. Kesidou, and L. Stern. 1997. Identifying curriculum materials for science literacy: A Project 2061 evaluation tool. Paper presented at the NRC colloquium "Using the National Science Education Standards to Guide the Evaluation, Selection, and Adaptation of Instructional Materials." Washington, D.C. November 1996. Internet address: http://project2061.aaas.org/newsinfo/research/roseman/roseman2.html
Rotberg, I.C. 1998. Interpretation of International Test Score Comparisons. Science 280:1030-31.
Schmidt, W.H., and C.C. McKnight. 1998. What can we really learn from TIMSS? Science 282:1830-31.
Schmidt, W.H., C.C. McKnight, and S.A. Raizen. 1997. A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Executive summary available on the Internet: http://ustimss.msu.edu/splintrd.htm
Stedman, J.B. 1993 (and update reports). Goals 2000: Educate America Act, Overview and Analysis. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Stern, L. 1999. Are you really testing for science literacy? Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, Mass., March 28-31.
Tyson, H. 1997. Overcoming structural barriers to good textbooks. Paper prepared for and available from the National Education Goals Panel. Internet address: http://www.negp.gov/Reports/tyson.htm
Tyson-Bernstein, H. 1988. America's Textbook Fiasco: A Conspiracy of Good Intentions. Washington, D.C.: Council for Basic Education.
Webb, N.L. 1997. Determining Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education. National Institute for Science Education, Brief Vol. 1, No. 2, January 1997. Internet address: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/NISE/
Weiss, I.R. 1991. Curricular Materials for Mathematics and Science: Usage and Perceived Needs From the Field. Chapel Hill, N.C: Horizon Research.
Wheeler, G. 1999a. Information reported on a 1996 survey of members of the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) by the NSTA Office of Public Information.
Wheeler, G. 1999b. Information reported from the National Science Teachers Association's general registry.
Woodward, A., and D.L. Elliott. 1990. Textbooks: Consensus and controversy. In Textbooks and Schooling in the United States: Eighty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
