The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Keeping Score: Assessment in Practice
References
Arcavi, A., Kessel, C., Meira, L., & Smith, J. (1998). Teaching mathematical problem solving: A microanalysis of an emergent classroom community. In A. Schoenfeld, E. Dubinsky, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics EducationIII (pp. 1-70). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Beck, P. (1998). Alignment analysis: Assessment to standards. Unpublished manuscript.
Bell, A. (1993). Some experiments in diagnostic teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics,24, 115-137.
Bell, A. W., Swan, M., Onslow, B., Pratt, K., & Purdy, D. (1985). Diagnostic teaching: Teaching for long term learning. Report of ESRC Project HR8491 / 1, Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,80(2), 139-148.
Bond, L. (1995). Unintended consequences of performance assessment: Issues of bias and fairness. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,14(4), 21-24.
Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Close, G. (1996). Developing criterion-referenced, open-response, national test items. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Diego, CA.
Cobb, P., & Lampert, M. (1998). Communication. White paper prepared for the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA.
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole. Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 81
Keeping Score: Assessment in Practice
References
Arcavi, A., Kessel, C., Meira, L., & Smith, J. (1998). Teaching mathematical problem solving: A microanalysis of an emergent classroom community. In A. Schoenfeld, E. Dubinsky, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III (pp. 1-70). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Beck, P. (1998). Alignment analysis: Assessment to standards. Unpublished manuscript.
Bell, A. (1993). Some experiments in diagnostic teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 115-137.
Bell, A. W., Swan, M., Onslow, B., Pratt, K., & Purdy, D. (1985). Diagnostic teaching: Teaching for long term learning. Report of ESRC Project HR 8491 / 1, Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham, Shell Centre for Mathematical Education.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
Bond, L. (1995). Unintended consequences of performance assessment: Issues of bias and fairness. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 21-24.
Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Close, G. (1996). Developing criterion-referenced, open-response, national test items. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Diego, CA.
Cobb, P., & Lampert, M. (1998). Communication. White paper prepared for the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA.
OCR for page 82
Keeping Score: Assessment in Practice
Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students' thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23, 167-180.
Floden, R.E. (1996). Teachers' choices about content: The Standards in use. Unpublished paper prepared for November 1996 symposium sponsored by the Board on International Comparative Studies in Education of the National Research Council. Washington, DC.
Graeber, A.O., & Campbell, P.F. (1993). Misconceptions about multiplication and division. Arithmetic Teacher, 39, 408-411.
Greeno, J., & Hall, R. (1997). Practicing Representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361-367.
Hartocollis, A. (1999, April 8). In Bronx, Regents coaching is extended to teachers, too . New York Times, pp. B1, B3.
Heid, M.K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 3-25.
Henningsen, M. & Stein, M.K. (1996). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning.
Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 3-19.
Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (p. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.
Hiebert, J. & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, understanding and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 14(3), 251-283.
Jakwerth, P.R., Stancavage, F.B., & Reed, E.D. (1999). An investigation of why students do not respond to questions. Report commissioned by the NAEP Validity Studies (NVS) Panel. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
Learning First Alliance. (1998). Every child mathematically proficient: An action plan. Washington, DC: Author.
Lesh, R., Lamon, S.J., Lester, F., & Behr, M. (1992). Future directions for mathematics assessment. In R. Lesh & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 379-425). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Linn, R. (1994). Performance assessment: Policy promises and technical measurement standards. Educational Researcher, 23(9), 4-14.
Massell, D., Kirst, M., & Hoppe, M. (1997). Persistence and change: Standards-based reform in nine states. Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
National Assessment Governing Board. (1995). Mathematics framework for the 1996 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Author.
OCR for page 83
Keeping Score: Assessment in Practice
National Center on Education and the Economy. (1998). Core assignment: Volume. Washington, DC: Author.
National Center on Education and the Economy & University of Pittsburgh. (1997). New Standards performance standards. (Volumes 1-3). Washington, DC: Author.
National Center on Education and the Economy & University of Pittsburgh. (1997-1999). New Standards mathematics reference examinations. Washington, DC: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1998). Principles and standards for school mathematics: Discussion draft. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & National Research Council. (1997). Improving student learning in mathematics and science: The role of national standards and state policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1990). Reshaping school mathematics: A philosophy and framework for curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1991). For good measure: Principles and goals for mathematics assessment . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1993a). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1993b). Measuring what counts: A conceptual guide for mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (1997). Learning from TIMMS: Results of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, summary of a symposium. A. Beatty, (Ed.), Board on International Comparative Studies in Education, Board on Testing and Assessment, Committee on Science Education K-12, and Mathematical Sciences Education Board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1998). High school mathematics at work: Essays and examples for the education of all students. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OCR for page 84
Keeping Score: Assessment in Practice
Porter, A.C., Kirst, M.W., Osthoff, E.J., Smithson, J.L., & Schneider, S.A. (1993). Reform up close: A classroom analysis. Final report to the NSF on Grant No. SPA-8953446 to the Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Resnick, L., & Nolan, K.J. (1995). From aptitude to effort: A new foundation for our schools. Daedalus, 124(4), 55-52.
Romberg, T.A., Zarinnia, E.A., & Williams, S.R. (1990). Mandated school mathematics testing in the United States: A survey of state mathematical supervisors. Madison, WI: National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education.
Schmidt, W.H., & Cogan, L.S. (1999). The rest of the story: Putting the U.S. twelfth grade TIMSS mathematics achievement results in perspective. Focus on Calculus: A Newsletter for the Calculus Consortium Based at Harvard University, No. 16, 6-8.
Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C.C., & Raizen, S.A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Schmidt, W.H., McKnight, C.C., Valverde, G.A., Houang, R.T., & Wiley, D.E. (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Schoen, H.L., & Ziebarth, S.W. (1998). Assessment of students' mathematical performance (A Core-Plus Mathematics Project Field Test Progress Report). Iowa City, IA: Core-Plus Mathematics Project Evaluation Site, University of Iowa.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of ''well taught" mathematics classes. Educational Psychologist, 23, 145-166.
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1989). Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 338-355.
Schoenfeld, A.H., Burkhardt, H., Daro, P., & Stanley, R. (1993). A framework for balance. Unpublished manuscript, Balanced Assessment & New Standards projects.
Schoenfeld, A., Burkhardt, H., Schwartz, J., & Wilcox, S.J. (1999), Balanced assessment for the mathematics curriculum (8 packages). Menlo Park, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.
OCR for page 85
Keeping Score: Assessment in Practice
Shannon, A., & Zawojewski, J. (1995). Mathematics performance assessment: A new game for students. Mathematics Teacher, 88(9), 752-757.
Shavelson, R.J., & Baxter, G.P. (1992). What we've learned about assessing hands-on science. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 21-25.
Shavelson, R.J., Gao, X., & Baxter, G.R. (1993). Sampling variability of performance assessments (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 361). Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Research in Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.
Shavelson, R.J., Webb, N.M., & Rowley, G. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922-932.
Stein, M.K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50-80.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMMS Video Study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 14-21.
Webb, N. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education and Council of Chief State School Officers.
Wilson, J.W., Fernandez, M.L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. In Wilson, P.S. (ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics. New York: Macmillan.
Zucker, A.A., & Esty, E.T. (1993). Promoting discourse in mathematics classrooms using a new video series for middle schools. Paper presented as part of a symposium entitled "The Potential of Video-Based Materials to Promote Classroom Discourse in Mathematics," at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
