Doyle, W. (1988). Work in mathematics classes: The context of students' thinking during instruction. Educational Psychologist, 23, 167-180.

Floden, R.E. (1996). Teachers' choices about content: The Standards in use. Unpublished paper prepared for November 1996 symposium sponsored by the Board on International Comparative Studies in Education of the National Research Council. Washington, DC.

Graeber, A.O., & Campbell, P.F. (1993). Misconceptions about multiplication and division. Arithmetic Teacher, 39, 408-411.

Greeno, J., & Hall, R. (1997). Practicing Representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361-367.

Hartocollis, A. (1999, April 8). In Bronx, Regents coaching is extended to teachers, too . New York Times, pp. B1, B3.

Heid, M.K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 3-25.

Henningsen, M. & Stein, M.K. (1996). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning.

Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 3-19.

Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (p. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.

Hiebert, J. & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, understanding and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 14(3), 251-283.

Jakwerth, P.R., Stancavage, F.B., & Reed, E.D. (1999). An investigation of why students do not respond to questions. Report commissioned by the NAEP Validity Studies (NVS) Panel. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

Learning First Alliance. (1998). Every child mathematically proficient: An action plan. Washington, DC: Author.

Lesh, R., Lamon, S.J., Lester, F., & Behr, M. (1992). Future directions for mathematics assessment. In R. Lesh & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 379-425). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Linn, R. (1994). Performance assessment: Policy promises and technical measurement standards. Educational Researcher, 23(9), 4-14.

Massell, D., Kirst, M., & Hoppe, M. (1997). Persistence and change: Standards-based reform in nine states. Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

National Assessment Governing Board. (1995). Mathematics framework for the 1996 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Author.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement