National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$86.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Review of the U.S. Army's Health Risk Assessments for Oral Exposure to Six Chemical-Warfare Agents (1999)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "B: Health Risk Assessment for the Nerve Agent GB." Review of the U.S. Army's Health Risk Assessments for Oral Exposure to Six Chemical-Warfare Agents. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1999.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
166
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Review of the U.S. Army's Health Risk Assessments for Oral Exposure to Six Chemical-Warfare Agents

GB Type II - RBC Cholinesterase Inhibition in Female Ratsa (ANOVA and Dunnett's Comparison)

Oral Dose (µg/kg/day)

Week

 

-1

1

3

7

13

0

 

ns/

ns/

ns/

ns/

75

_/ns

ns/ns

ns/ns

ns/ns

ns/ns

150

_/ns

S/S

S/ns

S/S

ns/S

300

_/ns

S/S

S/S

S/S

ns/S

Source: Re-evaluation of data from Bucci and Parker, 1992.

a Six animals/dose group

b Comparison to pre-exposure value (week -1)/comparison to control (0 µg/kg/day) value.

ns. Not statistically significant.

S. Statistically significant at p <0.05.

GB Type II - RBC Cholinesterase Inhibition in Male Ratsa (ANOVA and Dunnett's Comparison)

Oral Dose (µg/kg/day)

Week

 

-1

1

3

7

13

0

0

ns/

ns/

ns/

ns/

75

_/ns

S/S

S/S

S/S

ns/ns

150

_/ns

S/S

S/S

S/S

S/ns

300

_/ns

S/S

S/S

S/S

S/ns

Source: Re-evaluation of data from Bucci and Parker, 1992.

a Six animals/dose group

b Comparison to pre-exposure value (week -1)/comparison to control (0 µg/kg/day) value.

ns. Not statistically significant.

S. Statistically significant at p <0.05.

Page
166