National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$32.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: II. Evaluating Research Progress and Updating the Portfolio (1999)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)
Commission on Life Sciences (CLS)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Citation Manager

. "B: The Committee's Statement of Task." Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: II. Evaluating Research Progress and Updating the Portfolio. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1999.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
111
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: • II •, Evaluating Research Progress and Updating the Portfolio

Appendix B
THE COMMITTEE'S STATEMENT OF TASK

The committee will assess research priorities, develop a conceptual research plan, and monitor research progress toward improved understanding of the relationships between airborne particulate matter (PM), its various sources, and its effects on public health. The study will focus on PM-related research being conducted, funded, or planned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the context of PM-related research being conducted, funded, or planned by other agencies and organizations in the United States and abroad.

Four reports will be prepared. The first report, required by Congress within four months of project initiation, will identify the most important short-term and longer-term research priorities relevant to evaluating, setting, and implementing primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter (PM). The second report will expand upon the assessment of research priorities and present conceptual plans for the monitoring and evaluation of research. Subsequent reports at the end of the third and fifth years will evaluate research progress and update the research priorities and plans as warranted.

Page
111

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 111
Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: • II •, Evaluating Research Progress and Updating the Portfolio Appendix B THE COMMITTEE'S STATEMENT OF TASK The committee will assess research priorities, develop a conceptual research plan, and monitor research progress toward improved understanding of the relationships between airborne particulate matter (PM), its various sources, and its effects on public health. The study will focus on PM-related research being conducted, funded, or planned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the context of PM-related research being conducted, funded, or planned by other agencies and organizations in the United States and abroad. Four reports will be prepared. The first report, required by Congress within four months of project initiation, will identify the most important short-term and longer-term research priorities relevant to evaluating, setting, and implementing primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter (PM). The second report will expand upon the assessment of research priorities and present conceptual plans for the monitoring and evaluation of research. Subsequent reports at the end of the third and fifth years will evaluate research progress and update the research priorities and plans as warranted.

OCR for page 112
This page in the original is blank.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

particulate matter