National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

Industrial Technology Assessments

An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies

Committee on Industrial Technology Assessments

National Materials Advisory Board

Board on Manufacturing and Engineering Design

Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems

National Research Council

Publication NMAB-487-4

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the panel responsible for the report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance.

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was established by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and of advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.

This project was conducted under a contract with the Department of Energy. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.

Copyright 1999 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

International Standard Book Number: 0-309-06631-X

Available in limited supply from:

National Materials Advisory Board
National Research Council
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20418
202-334-3505
nmab@nas.edu

Additional copies are available for sale from:
National Academy Press
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Box 285
Washington, D.C. 20055
800-624-6242 or 202-334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area)
http://www.nap.edu

Printed in the United States of America.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS

R. RAY BEEBE (chair), Consultant,

Tucson, Arizona

GARY A. BAUM,

Institute of Paper and Science Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

JOHN V. BUSCH,

IBIS Associates, Wellesley, Massachusetts

NORMAN A. GJOSTEIN, Consultant,

Dearborn, Michigan

FRANCIS C. McMICHAEL,

Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

MAXINE L. SAVITZ,

AlliedSignal Aerospace Corporation, Torrance, California

National Materials Advisory Board Staff

THOMAS E. MUNNS, Associate Director

AIDA C. NEEL, Senior Project Assistant

National Materials Advisory Board Liaison

KATHLEEN C. TAYLOR,

General Motors Corporation, Warren, Michigan

Government Liaisons

DENISE SWINK,

U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

JAMES E. QUINN,

U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

NATIONAL MATERIALS ADVISORY BOARD

EDGAR A. STARKE (chair),

University of Virginia, Charlottesville

JESSE L. BEAUCHAMP,

California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

EARL DOWELL,

Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

EDWARD C. DOWLING,

Cleveland Cliffs, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio

THOMAS EAGAR,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

ALASTAIR GLASS,

Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New Jersey

MARTIN E. GLICKSMAN,

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York

JOHN A.S. GREEN,

The Aluminum Association, Washington, D.C.

SIEGFRIED S. HECKER,

Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico

JOHN H. HOPPS,

Morehouse College, Atlanta, Georgia

MICHAEL JAFFE,

New Jersey Center for Biomaterials and Medical Devices, Piscataway

SYLVIA M. JOHNSON,

SRI International, Menlo Park, California

SHEILA F. KIA,

General Motors Research and Development, Warren, Michigan

LIAS KLEIN,

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway

HARRY A. LIPSITT,

Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

ALAN G. MILLER,

Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, Seattle, Washington

ROBERT C. PFAHL,

Motorola, Schaumberg, Illinois

JULIA PHILLIPS,

Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico

KENNETH L. REIFSNIDER,

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

JAMES WAGNER,

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

JULIA WEERTMAN,

Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

BILL G.W. YEE,

Pratt and Whitney, West Palm Beach, Florida

RICHARD CHAIT, Director

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

BOARD ON MANUFACTURING AND ENGINEERING DESIGN

F. STAN SETTLES (chair),

University of Southern California, Los Angeles

ERNEST R. BLOOD,

Caterpillar, Inc., Mossville, Illinois

JOHN BOLLINGER,

University of Wisconsin, Madison

JOHN CHIPMAN,

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

DOROTHY COMASSAR,

GE Aircraft Engines, Cincinnati, Ohio

ROBERT A. DAVIS,

The Boeing Company, Seattle, Washington

GARY L. DENMAN,

GRC International, Inc., Vienna, Virginia

ROBERT EAGAN,

Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico

MARGARET A. EASTWOOD,

Motorola, Inc., Schaumburg, Illinois

EDITH M. FLANIGEN, UOP (retired),

White Plains, New York

JOHN W. GILLESPIE,

University of Delaware, Newark

JAMIE C. HSU,

General Motors, Warren, Michigan

RICHARD L. KEGG,

Milacron, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio

JAMES MATTICE,

Universal Technology Corporation, Dayton, Ohio

CAROLYN W. MEYERS,

North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro

FRIEDRICH B. PRINZ,

Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

DALIBOR F. VRSALOVIC,

AT&T Laboratories, Menlo Park, California

JOSEPH WIRTH,

RayChem Corporation. (retired), Los Altos, California

JOEL S. YUDKEN,

AFL-CIO, Washington, D.C.

RICHARD CHAIT, Director

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

PANEL ON INTERMETALLIC ALLOY DEVELOPMENT

NORMAN A. GJOSTEIN (chair), Consultant,

Dearborn, Michigan

JOHN V. BUSCH,

IBIS Associates, Wellesley, Massachusetts

TIMOTHY HOWSON,

Wyman-Gordon Company, North Grafton, Massachusetts

LYMAN A. JOHNSON,

GE Aircraft Engines, Cincinnati, Ohio

HARRY A. LIPSITT,

Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio

ANATOLY NEMZER,

FMC Corporation, Princeton, New Jersey

MAXINE L. SAVITZ,

AlliedSignal Aerospace Corporation, Torrance, California

PANEL ON MANUFACTURING PROCESS CONTROLS

GARY A. BAUM (chair),

Institute of Paper Science and Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

THOMAS G. DEVILLE,

Bechtel Technology and Consulting, San Francisco, California

RICHARD J. EBERT,

Alcoa Technical Center, Alcoa Center, Pennsylvania

DENNIS K. KILLINGER,

University of South Florida, Tampa

STEVEN R. LECLAIR,

U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, WPAFB, Ohio

JAY LEE,

United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, Connecticut

FRANCIS C. MCMICHAEL,

Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

JORGE L. VALDES,

Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New Jersey

PANEL ON SEPARATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR INDUSTRIAL RECYCLING AND REUSE

GEORGE E. KELLER II (chair), Consultant,

South Charleston, West Virginia

R. RAY BEEBE, Consultant,

Tucson, Arizona

RICHARD J. FRUEHAN,

Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

NORMAN N. LI,

NL Chemical Technology, Inc., Arlington Heights, Illinois

EVE L. MENGER,

Corning, Inc. (retired), Corning, New York

GUIDO P. PEZ,

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania

PETER H. PFROMM,

Institute of Paper Science and Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

RONALD W. ROUSSEAU,

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

MICHAEL P. THOMAS,

Alcan Aluminum Corporation, Shelbyville, Tennessee

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

Acknowledgments

The Committee on Industrial Technology Assessments would like to thank all of the participants in the workshop panel studies, which were the principal data-gathering sessions for this study. The information and insight from these groups were invaluable to the committee.

In addition, the committee would like to thank those individuals who prepared presentations for committee meetings. Presenters included: Edward Dowling of Cyprus Amax; Joseph Wirth of RayChem; Gary Denman of GRC International; Paul Peercy of SEMI/SEMATECH; William Hanson of MIT Leaders in Manufacturing Program; Helena Chum of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory; Peter Angelini of Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Thomas Foust of the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory; Al Slywester of Sandia National Laboratories; and Thomas Foust, Doug Kaempf, Gideon Varga, Kurt Sisson, William Parks, and Marsha Quinn of the Department of Energy's Office of Industrial Technology. The committee is particularly grateful to Jim Quinn and Denise Swink and the staff of the Office of Industrial Technology for their technical assistance and support.

This report has been reviewed by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC's Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the authors and the NRC in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The content of the review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their participation in the review of this report: James

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

J. Solberg, Purdue University; Edward Dowling, Cleveland Cliffs, Inc.; Gordon Forward, TXI Corporation; Michael Thomas, Alcan Aluminum Corporation; and Jay Lee, United Technologies Research Center.

While the individuals listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, responsibility for the final content of the report rests solely with the authoring committee and the NRC.

Finally, the panel gratefully acknowledges the support of the staff of the National Materials Advisory Board and Board on Manufacturing and Engineering Design, including Thomas E. Munns, study director, and Aida C. Neel, senior project assistant.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

Preface

In 1993, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Industrial Technology (OIT) established a group of seven industries designated as Industries of the Future (IOF). These industries were selected for their high energy use and large waste generation. The original IOF included the aluminum, chemicals, forest products, glass, metalcasting, petroleum refining, and steel industries. Each industry was asked to provide a future vision and a road map detailing the research required to realize its vision. In November 1994, the forest products industry was the first of the IOF industries to enter into an agreement with DOE.

OIT asked the National Research Council's National Materials Advisory Board (NMAB) to provide guidance for OIT's transition to the new IOF strategy. The Committee on Industrial Technology Assessment (CITA) was formed for this purpose with the specific tasks of reviewing and evaluating the overall OIT program, reviewing selected OIT-sponsored research projects, and identifying crosscutting technologies (i.e., technologies applicable to more than one industry). CITA was asked to focus on three specific areas: intermetallic alloys, manufacturing process controls, and separations. A separate panel was formed to study each area and publish the results in separate reports.

The committee was composed of experts with a wealth of knowledge in industrial processing, industrial energy utilization, and environmental issues and technologies. The committee members, in addition to serving on panels, held four meetings to develop the overall program assessment and to oversee the study panels. The committee meetings included briefing sessions on the organization and status of the OIT program; a review of project selection and management issues in industrial, academic, and government research programs; a review of specific IOF industry approaches to project selection and prioritization; and a

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

discussion of the role of the national laboratories in the IOF program. The conclusions and recommendations of the committee can be found in chapters 3 and 4. Chapter 3 includes general conclusions and lessons to be drawn from the panel studies of selected crosscutting technologies. Chapter 4 includes the committee's assessment of the overall program.

The chair wishes to thank the committee members for their enthusiasm, dedication, and service and the excellent OIT staff for their assistance, cooperation, and professionalism. The chair thanks all of the participants for their insights and stimulating discussions and the staff of the NMAB for their coordination and assistance throughout the entire process, including the publication of this report.

Comments and suggestions can be sent via electronic mail to nmab@nas.edu or by FAX to NMAB (202) 334-3718.

R. RAY BEEBE, chair

COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

Acronyms


AF&PA

American Forest and Paper Association

AIM

advanced industrial materials

AISI

American Iron and Steel Institute

API

American Petroleum Institute

ATS

advanced turbine systems


CEO

chief executive officer

CFCC

continuous-fiber ceramic composites

CITA

Committee on Industrial Technology Assessments

CMC

Cast Metals Coalition

CTO

chief technology officer


DARPA

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

DOD

Department of Defense

DOE

Department of Energy


ECUT

energy conversion and utilization


FY

fiscal year


I&I

Inventions and Innovations

IOF

Industries of the Future


LCC

Laboratory Coordinating Council


MEMS

microelectromechanical systems


NICE3

National Industrial Competitiveness through Energy, Environment, and Economics

NMA

National Mining Association

NRC

National Research Council

NSF

National Science Foundation


OIT

Office of Industrial Technology

ORNL

Oak Ridge National Laboratory


R&D

research and development

Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×

Tables, Box, and Figures

Tables

4-1

 

Status of Industry Cost Sharing for IOF-Specific Projects (as of October 1998)

 

40

4-2

 

Budget Trends for OIT Program Areas (in $ millions)

 

42

4-3

 

Trends in IOF-Specific Allocations (in $ millions)

 

43

Box

2-1

 

A Case History: The Forest Products Industry

 

13

Figures

4-1

 

Aluminum industry summary road map for the development of inert anode technology

 

35

4-2

 

''Pathway'' (road map) for the forest products industry

 

37

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 1999. Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9657.
×
Page R14
Next: Executive Summary »
Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies Get This Book
×
 Industrial Technology Assessments: An Evaluation of the Research Program of the Office of Industrial Technologies
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 1993, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Industrial Technology (OIT) established a group of seven industries designated as Industries of the Future (IOF). These industries were selected for their high energy use and large waste generation. The original IOF included the aluminum, chemicals, forest products, glass, metalcasting, petroleum refining, and steel industries. Each industry was asked to provide a future vision and a road map detailing the research required to realize its vision. In November 1994, the forest products industry was the first of the IOF industries to enter into an agreement with DOE.

OIT asked the National Research Council's National Materials Advisory Board (NMAB) to provide guidance for OIT's transition to the new IOF strategy. The Committee on Industrial Technology Assessment (CITA) was formed for this purpose with the specific tasks of reviewing and evaluating the overall OIT program, reviewing selected OIT-sponsored research projects, and identifying crosscutting technologies (i.e., technologies applicable to more than one industry). CITA was asked to focus on three specific areas: intermetallic alloys, manufacturing process controls, and separations. A separate panel was formed to study each area and publish the results in separate reports.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!