National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 Conclusions and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1999. Technology-Based Pilot Programs: Improving Future U.S. Military Reserve Forces. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9675.
×

References

Callander, B.D. 1998. Pressures on the Guard and Reserve. Air Force Association Magazine 81(11): 36-40.

Cebrowski, A.K., and J.J. Garstka. 1998. Network-centric warfare: its origin and future. U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings 124(1): 28-35.

CJCS (Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff). 1996. Joint Vision 2010. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff.

CJCS. 1997. Concept for Future Joint Operations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Cohen, W. S. 1999. Present conditions demand that we use the total force. The Officer 74(1): 24-27.

Collins, J. 1998. The complex content of American military culture: a practitioner's view. The Washington Quarterly 21(4): 213-228.

Cragin, C.L. 1999. Building the total force of today and tomorrow. The Officer 74(1): 31-35.


DA (Department of the Army). 1998a. 1997 Annual Review: Army Research Laboratory. Adelphi, Md.: Department of the Army, Army Research Laboratory.

DA. 1998b. TRADOC (Training and Doctrine Command) Digital Learning Strategy/Digital Division Learning Program Memorandum. September 28, 1998. Fort Monroe, Va.: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command.

DA. 1999a. Battle Staff Training: The Constructivist Adaptive Learning Model. Briefing to BG Wood. Feb 2, 1999. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Department of the Army, Army Research Laboratory.

DA. 1999b. Annex E (Training) to Task Force TLS (Training, leader development, soldier support) Implementing Directive 99-01. April 15, 1999. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Department of the Army, Strike Force Headquarters.

DoD (U.S. Department of Defense). 1970. Support for Guard and Reserve Forces. Secretary of Defense Memorandum, August 21, 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense.

DoD. 1988. Reserve Component Programs. Annual Report of the Reserve Forces Policy Board to the President for Fiscal Year 1987. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Reserve Forces Policy Board.

DoD. 1995. Directions for Defense. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Commission on Roles and Missions of the Armed Forces.

DoD. 1997a. Integration of the Reserve and Active Components. Secretary of Defense Memorandum, September 4, 1997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense.

DoD. 1997b. Transforming Defense: National Security in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, National Defense Panel.

DoD. 1998a. Defense Manpower Requirements Report, FY 1999. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.

DoD. 1998b. Annual Report to the President and the Congress for Fiscal Year 1997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense.

DoD. 1998c. Official Guard and Reserve Manpower Strengths and Statistics, 1998: Reserve Components Common Personnel Data System. Monterey, Calif.: U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Manpower Data Center.

DoD. 1998d. Joint Operations Superiority in the 21st Century: Integrating Capabilities Underwriting Joint Vision 2010 and Beyond. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Science Board.

DoD. 1998e. Reserve Component Programs. Annual Report of the Reserve Forces Policy Board to the President for Fiscal Year 1997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Reserve Forces Policy Board.

DoD. 1998f. The Year of Total Force Integration: Symposium Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Reserve Forces Policy Board.

DoD. 1999a. Secretary of Defense Cohen Establishes Reserve Component Web Security Cell. News Release, February 25, 1999. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Public Affairs.

DoD. 1999b. National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2000, Manpower Table 7-5. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Comptroller.

DoD. 1999c. National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2000, Total Obligation Authority by Title Table 6-1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Comptroller.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1999. Technology-Based Pilot Programs: Improving Future U.S. Military Reserve Forces. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9675.
×

Gibbs, W.W. 1997. The Law of Moore. Scientific American Special Issue, Solid State Century, October 1997: 62-63.


Kriedberg, M.A., and M.G. Henry, 1955. History of Military Mobilization in the U.S. Army 1775-1945. DA-Pam 20-212. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army.


MacGregor, D.A. 1997. Breaking the Phalanx: A New Design for Land Power in the 21st Century. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers.


NRC (National Research Council). 1995. Commercial Multimedia Technologies for Twenty-First Century Army Battlefields. Board on Army Science and Technology, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

NRC. 1999. Recapitalizing the Navy: A Strategy for Managing the Infrastructure. Naval Studies Board, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.


Shelton, H. 1999. One force for one fight. The Officer 74(1): 28-30.

Smiley, R. 1999. Personal communication between Colonel Robert Smiley, Director of Mobilization, Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and Margaret Novack, study director, Committee on Reserve Forces for 2010 and Beyond. January 11, 1999.


The White House. 1997. A National Security Strategy for a New Century. Washington, D.C.: The White House.


USAF (U.S. Air Force). 1997. Global Engagement: A Vision for the 21st Century Air Force. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Air Force.

Title 10 USC (U.S. Code). 1995. Armed Forces. Section 12304. Prepared for the Committee on National Security of the House of Representatives, 104th Congress, 1st Session. March, 1995. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1999. Technology-Based Pilot Programs: Improving Future U.S. Military Reserve Forces. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9675.
×
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 1999. Technology-Based Pilot Programs: Improving Future U.S. Military Reserve Forces. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9675.
×
Page 64
Next: Appendix A Committee Meetings »
Technology-Based Pilot Programs: Improving Future U.S. Military Reserve Forces Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

As the twenty-first century approaches, the number of full-time, active duty personnel in the U.S. military (excluding the Reserves and National Guard) is about 1.4 million, the lowest level since before World War II. Nevertheless, the U.S. military is supposed to be prepared to fight two major-theater wars almost simultaneously while conducting peacekeeping operations and other assignments around the globe. To fulfill this wide range of missions, the U.S. military must continue to rely on the Reserves and National Guard, which are known collectively as the reserve components. The current number of reserve components is almost equal to the number of active duty personnel. In the case of the U.S. Army, the number of reserves is double the number of active personnel.

This study addresses how technology can be used to improve the readiness and effectiveness of the reserve components and their integration with the active components. Many technologies are expected to enhance the capabilities of the U.S. military in the twenty-first century, including precision weapons, high-fidelity sensors, long-range surveillance, enhanced stealth characteristics, and advanced communications and information systems. This study reaffirms the importance of improved communication and information systems, for improving comprehensive training and accelerating the mobilization of reserve components for military missions in the coming decade. Although programs using these technologies are already under way in both the reserve and active components of the military, this study focuses on the effectiveness of reserve components and active-reserve integration.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!