Appendix A
Committee Meetings
FIRST MEETING
January 20-21, 1998 Washington, D.C.
Meeting objectives: conduct administrative business, including introductions, discussions of composition and balance for new members, introduction to the National Research Council, committee and report procedures, and administrative support; receive briefings; conduct panel discussion on ''future utilization of Reserve Forces"; discuss statement of task with sponsor; discuss project plan and report realization; establish meeting objectives, location, and date for the next committee meeting.
Panel Discussion
Future Utilization of Reserve Forces
COL Mark Chmar
National Guard Bureau
COL Jeffrey Barnett
Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Strategy and Threat Reduction)
Edward Mahen
National Defense Panel
Bill Vogt
TASC, Inc.
Presenters
History and Organization of Reserve Components
Dan Kohner
Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs)
Sponsor Expectations
Joel Resnick and COL Pat McAleer
Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs)
SECOND MEETING
February 23-24, 1998 Washington, D.C.
Meeting objectives: discuss the technological environment in 2010, service and reserve component requirements for 2010, and military associations' perspectives; receive briefings; discuss and approve report concept draft; assign writing responsibilities; determine meeting objectives, location, and date for the next committee meeting.
Presenters
Overview of the Reserve Forces
Terrence O'Connell III
Office of Secretary of Defense
Overview of the U.S. Army
COL Richard Payne
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, Future Battle Directorate
Overview of the U.S. Navy
RADM John Byrd
Office of Chief of Naval Operations Strategy and Policy Division
Overview of the U.S. Coast Guard
Paul Redmond
U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters
Overview of the U.S. Army Reserve
BG James Helmly
Office of the Chief Army Reserve Reserve Component Perspectives
Overview of the U.S. Naval Reserve
RADM John B. Totushek
Office of Chief Naval Reserve
Overview of the Air Force Reserve
Lt Col Bob Shaw
Office of Chief Air Force Reserve Operations and Plans
Overview of the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
COL Paul Herbert
Strategic Plans and Policy - J5
Overview of the U.S. Marine Corps
COL Michael Fallon
Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Science and Innovation
Overview of the U.S. Air Force
LTC Allison Hickey
Chief of Staff, Air Force Long Range Planning Office
Overview of the Army National Guard
BG Michael Squier
National Guard Bureau, Army National Guard Directorate
Overview of the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve
MAJ Donald Bauza
Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
Overview of the Air National Guard
COL Richard Joyce
Communications and Information
Work of IDA on Guard and Reserve Issues
Mr. John Brinkerhoff
Institute for Defense Analyses
Work of the RAND Corporation on Guard and Reserve Issues
Thomas McNaugher
RAND Corporation
Panel Discussion
Military Reserve Associations
MajGen Edward Philbin, ANGUS, retired
National Guard Association of the United States
MG Roger Sandler, AUS retired
Reserve Officers Association
RADM Thomas Hall, USN, retired
Naval Reserve Association
THIRD MEETING
April 13-14, 1998 Washington, D.C.
Meeting objectives: complete composition and balance discussion for members; discuss chapters 1 and 2; consider analysis of technologies; consider potential tests and experiments; receive briefings on types of technologies appropriate for the report and provide an example of optimal integration; determine meeting objectives, location, and date for the next committee meeting.
Presenters
Israeli Reserves-How They Stay Ready
MG Zeev Livne
Embassy of Israel, Military Attaché
Future Technologies
George Singley
Hicks Associates, Inc.
Technologies in the Intelligence Arena
Luke Rentschler
Defense Intelligence Agency
Potential Tests and Experiments-Data Connectivity
Pamela Combs
INTERSOLV
Potential Tests and Experiments-Advanced Distributed Learning
Michael Kendall and Donald Johnson
Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness)
Barriers to AC/RC Integration
MajGen Sam Carpenter
Office of Secretary of Defense
RC Soldiers Perspective on Technology
Ruth Phelps
Army Research Institute
Technologies in Army After Next
John Gully
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Tactical Technology
Potential Tests and Experiments-Information Networking
Stewart Personick
Bell Communications Research, Information Networking Research
FOURTH MEETING
June 22-23, 1998 Woods Hole, Massachusetts
Meeting objectives: complete composition and balance discussion for one member; receive briefing; review preliminary draft of report; finalize first initial draft with focus on chapters 3-6; consider future data-gathering requirements; confirm meeting objectives, location, and date for next meeting.
Presenter
Potential Pilot Programs
Gen Paul F. Gorman, U.S. Army (retired)
Independent Consultant
FIFTH MEETING
September 16-17, 1998 Washington, D.C.
Meeting objectives: receive briefings; discuss future technologies in depth; review, refine, and score pilot programs, tests, and experiments; review and revise chapters 3-6; draft the conclusions and recommendations; consider off-site visits; confirm meeting objectives, location, and date for the next committee meeting.
Presenter
Sponsor Expectations
Jennifer Buck
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs
Panel Discussion
Technologies of the Future
Summer Studies
Donald Latham
Defense Science Board
Accelerated Consequence Management
COL John Silva
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Office
Virtual Reality
Annette Sobell
Sandia National Laboratories
Bioengineering
Stephen W. Drew
MERCK Pharmaceutical
SIXTH MEETING
November 3-4, 1998 Washington, D.C.
Meeting objectives: discuss and approve report structure and general content; review, refine, and rescore pilot programs, tests, and experiments; refine the conclusions and recommendations; confirm meeting objectives, location, and date for the next committee meeting.
SEVENTH MEETING
January 28-29, 1999 Washington, D.C.
Meeting objectives: review and discuss concurrence draft procedures; review and discuss work plan; review, discuss, and approve preliminary concurrence draft of report.