References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education 1985. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. in press. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

American Institutes for Research 1998a. Background Paper Reviewing Laws and Regulations, Current Practice, and Research Relevant to Inclusion and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities. Prepared for the National Assessment Governing Board in Support of Contract RJ97153001. Palo Alto, CA, November 6.

1998b. Background Paper Reviewing Laws and Regulations, Current Practice, and Research Relevant to Inclusion and Accommodations for Students with Limited English Proficiency. Prepared for the National Assessment Governing Board in Support of Contract RJ97153001. Palo Alto, CA, November 6.


Beaton, A.E., and E.J. Gonzales 1995. The NAEP Primer. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.

Beaton, A.E., and R. Zwick 1992. Overview of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Statistics 17:95-109.

Beggs, D.L., and A.N. Hieronymus 1968. Uniformity of growth in the basic skills throughout the school year and during the summer. Journal of Educational Measurement 5:91-97.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 67
Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests References American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education 1985. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. in press. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. American Institutes for Research 1998a. Background Paper Reviewing Laws and Regulations, Current Practice, and Research Relevant to Inclusion and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities. Prepared for the National Assessment Governing Board in Support of Contract RJ97153001. Palo Alto, CA, November 6. 1998b. Background Paper Reviewing Laws and Regulations, Current Practice, and Research Relevant to Inclusion and Accommodations for Students with Limited English Proficiency. Prepared for the National Assessment Governing Board in Support of Contract RJ97153001. Palo Alto, CA, November 6. Beaton, A.E., and E.J. Gonzales 1995. The NAEP Primer. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College. Beaton, A.E., and R. Zwick 1992. Overview of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Statistics 17:95-109. Beggs, D.L., and A.N. Hieronymus 1968. Uniformity of growth in the basic skills throughout the school year and during the summer. Journal of Educational Measurement 5:91-97.

OCR for page 67
Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests Bock, D., and M. Zimowski 1999. Memo to Don McLaughlin, AIR, in reference to Linking Report No. 2. Unpublished document. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago. Brennan, R.L. 1992. The context of context effects. Applied Measurement in Education 5(3):225-264. Childs, R., and R. Hill 1998. Proposed Analysis of NAEP Data for Louisiana. Draft paper. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc., Dover, NH. Cooper, H., B. Nye, C. Kelly, J. Lindsay, and S. Greathouse 1996. The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research 66:227-268. CTB/McGraw-Hill 1997. Terra Nova: Technical Bulletin 1. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill. Donahue, P.L., K.E. Voelkl, J.R. Campbell, and J. Mazzeo 1999. NAEP 1998 Reading Report Card for the Nation and the States. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Dulmage, H.G. 1993. The Effect of Increasing Testing Time on the Results of the Reading Comprehension and Reference Materials Subtests of the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. DAI, Vol. 54-5A, p. 1608. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University. Dunbar, S.B., D.M. Koretz, and H.D. Hoover 1991. Quality control in the development and use of performance assessment. Applied Measurement in Education 4(4):289-303. Faggen, J., and M. McPeek 1981. Practice Effects for Four Different Item Types. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA. Feldt, L.S., R.A. Forsyth, T.N. Ansley, and S.D. Alnot 1996. Iowa Test of Educational Development, Form M: Norms and Score Conversions with Technical Information. Chicago: Riverside Publishing. Frederiksen, N. 1984. The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist 39:193-202. Gulliksen, H.O. 1950. Theory of Mental Tests. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Halla, J.W. 1988. A Psychological Study of Psychometric Differences in Graduate Record Examination Test Scores Between Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Adults. DAI, Vol. 49-11A, p. 3341. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.

OCR for page 67
Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests Hambleton, R.K., R.M. Jaeger, D.M. Koretz, J. Millman, and S.E. Phillips 1995. Review of the Measurement Quality of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System, 1991-1994. Frankfort, KY: Office of Educational Accountability, Kentucky General Assembly. Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement 1997. Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition: Technical Data Report. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement. Hartka, E., and D. McLaughlin 1994. A study of the administration of the 1992 National Assessment of Educational Progress trial state assessment. Pp. 479-522 in The Trial State Assessment: Prospects and Realities: Background Studies , National Academy of Education Panel on the Evaluation of the NAEP Trial State Assessment: 1992 Trial State Assessment. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education, Stanford University. Hoff, D.J. 1998. Achieve declares itself ready to aid states with reforms. Education Week 18(9):6. 1999. Achieve planning new math test for 8th-grade. Education Week 18(21):16. Hoover, H.D., A.N. Hieronymus, D.A. Frisbie, and S.B. Dunbar 1996. Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Form M: Norms and Score Conversions With Technical Information. Chicago: Riverside Publishing. Horne, L.V., and M.K. Garty 1981. What the Test Score Really Reflects: Observations of Teacher Behavior During Standardized Achievement Test Administration. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA. Huesman, R.L. 1999. The Validity of the ITBS Reading Comprehension Test Scores for Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Students Under Extended-Time Conditions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa. Iowa Testing Programs 1999. Comparisons of Iowa Median Midyear Performance. Unpublished internal document, Iowa Testing Programs, University of Iowa. Jakwerth, P.R., F.B. Stancavage, and E.D. Reed 1999. An Investigation of Why Students Do Not Respond to Questions. Report commissioned by the NAEP Validity Studies Panel, American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC. Joseph, R.M. 1998. The Effects of the Accommodation of Extended Time Limits on the CAT-5 for Middle School-Aged Individuals With Dyslexia. DAI, Vol. 59-3A, p. 772. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lowell . Journal of Educational Measurement 1992. Special Issue: The National Assessment of Educational Progress 29(2). J. Algina, ed. Journal of Educational Statistics 1992. Special Issue: National Assessment of Educational Progress 17(2). R. Zwick, guest ed.

OCR for page 67
Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests Kimmel, E.W. 1997. Unintended Consequences of Testing the Integrity of Teachers and Students. Paper presented at the National Conference on LargeScale Assessment, Colorado Springs, CO. Kiplinger, V.L., and R.L. Linn 1996. Raising the stakes of test administration: The impact on student performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Educational Assessment 3(2):111-133. Koretz, D.M., and S.I. Barron 1998. The Validity of Gains in Scores on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Washington, DC: RAND. Koretz, D.M., B. Stecher, S.P. Klein, and D. McCaffrey 1994. The Vermont Portfolio Assessment Program: Findings and implications. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 13(3):5-16. Koretz, D.M., S.I. Barron, K. Mitchell, and B. Stecher 1996a. The Perceived Effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). MR-792-PCT/FF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Koretz, D.M., K. Mitchell, S.I. Barron, and S. Keith 1996b. The Perceived Effects of the Maryland School Performance Assessment Program. CSE Technical Report No. 409. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California. Kronholz, J. 1998. States take lead in national tests for schoolchildren. Wall Street Journal Dec. 23:A16. Leary, L.F., and N.J. Dorans 1985. Implications for Altering the Context in Which Test Items Appear: A Historical Perspective on an Immediate Concern. Review of Educational Research 55(3):387-413. Ligon, G. 1985. Opportunity Knocked Out: Reducing Cheating by Teachers on Student Tests. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. Linn, R.L. 1993a. Educational Measurement. Third Edition. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press. 1993b. Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education 6(1):83-102. Martin, M.O. and D.L. Kelly, eds. 1996. Third International Mathematics and Science Study Technical Report Volume I: Design and Development. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College . Mazzeo, J., J. Donoghue, and C. Hombo 1999. Memo to Pascal D. Forgione, Commisioner of Education Statistics, NCES; Re: A Summary of Initial Analyses of 1998 State NAEP Exclusion Rates. Available online: http://nces.ed.gov/pressrelease/naep599ets.html (6/15/99).

OCR for page 67
Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests McLaughlin, D. 1998. Study of the Linkages of 1996 NAEP and State Mathematics Assessments in Four States: Final Report. Draft unpublished paper. John C. Flanagan Research Center, American Institutes for Research, Education Statistics Services Institute. Musick, M.D. 1996. Setting Education Standards High Enough. Unpublished paper. Southern Regional Education Board, Atlanta. National Research Council 1997. Educating One and All: Students With Disabilities and Standards-Based Reform. Committee on Goals 2000 and the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities. L. M. McDonnell, M. J. McLaughlin, and P. Morison, eds. Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1999a. Grading the Nation's Report Card: Evaluating NAEP and Transforming the Assessment of Educational Assessment. Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress. J.W. Pellegrino, L.R. Jones, and K.M. Mitchell, eds. Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1999b. High Stakes: Testing for Tracking, Promotion, and Graduation. Committee on Appropriate Test Use. J.P. Heubert and R.M. Hauser, eds. Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1999c. Uncommon Measures: Equivalence and Linkage Among Educational Tests. Committee the Equivalency and Linkage of Educational Tests. M.J. Feuer, P.W. Holland, B.F. Green, MW. Bertenthal, and F.C. Hemphill, eds. Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Nolen, S.B., T.M. Haladyna, and N.S. Haas 1992. Uses and abuses of achievement test scores. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 11(2):9-15. Olson, J.F., L. Bond, and C. Andrews in press. Annual Survey of State Student Assessment Programs: Fall 1998. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. O'Neil, H.F., B. Sugrue, J. Abedi, E.L. Baker, and S. Golan 1992. Final Report of Experimental Studies on Motivation and NAEP Test Performance. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Research, Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Roeber, E., L. Bond, and S. Connealy 1998. Annual Survey of State Student Assessment Programs: Fall 1997. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Rudman, H.C., and S.W. Raudenbush 1996. The Effect of Exceeding Prescribed Time Limits in the Administration of Standardized Achievement Tests. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Meeting, New York City.

OCR for page 67
Embedding Questions: The Pursuit of a Common Measure in Uncommon Tests Shavelson, R.J., G.P. Baxter, and X. Gao 1993. Sampling variability of performance assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement 30(3):215-232. U.S. Congress 1998. Conference Report on HR. 4328, Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. General Accounting Office 1998. Student Testing: Issues Related to Voluntary National Mathematics and Reading Tests. GAO/HEHS-98-163. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Whitney, D.R., and W.M. Patience 1981. Work Rates on the GED Tests: Relationships With Examinee Age and Test Time Limits. Washington, DC: GED Testing Service, American Council on Education. Williams, E.B. 1981. Performance of Inner City Learning Disabled and Emotionally Disturbed Youth on Power and Timed Achievement Tests. DAI, Vol. 41-12A, p. 5063. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut. Wolf, L.F., J.K. Smith, and M.E. Birnbaum 1995. Consequence of performance, test motivation, and mentally taxing items. Applied Measurement in Education 8(4):341-351.