The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Statistical Issues in Defense Analysis and Testing: Summary of a Workshop
Academy Press.(Reprinted 1993: Alexandria, Virginia: American Statistical Association.)
Parry, G.W., and P.W. Winter 1981Characterization and evaluation of uncertainty in probabilistic risk analysis. Nuclear Safety 22:28-42.
Rich, M., and E. Dews 1986Improving the Military Acquisition Process: Lessons from Rand Research . Contract R-3373-AF/RC. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Robinson, G.K. 1991That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects.Statistical Science 6(1):15-32.
Sacks, J., W.J. Welch, T.J. Mitchell, and H.P. Wynn 1989Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science4(4):409-423.
Samaniego, F. 1993On the Needs of the DoD Testing Community and the Expertise in the Statistical Research Community: A Look at the Interface. Technical Report 286, Technical Report Series of the Intercollege Division of Statistics, University of California, Davis.
Siegmund, D. 1985Sequential Analysis: Test and Confidence Intervals. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Tierney, L. 1990LISP-STAT: An Object-Oriented Environment for Statistical Computingand Dynamic Graphics. New York: John Wiley.
Tufte, E. 1983The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.
U.S. Department of Defense 1981Reliability Growth Management. MIL-HDBK-189. Department of Defense. Washington, D.C (February 13): U.S. Department of Defense. 1991Defense Acquisition Management, Policies, and Procedures.Department of Defense Instruction 5000.2, part 15. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense. 1992The New Assistant's Guide. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Office of the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense.
Wachter, K.W., and M.L. Straf, eds. 1990The Future of Meta-Analysis. Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.