National Academies Press: OpenBook

Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories (1999)

Chapter: Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents

« Previous: Appendix D: Symposium Agenda
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents." Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9704.
×

APPENDIX E

U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents

The following documents describe or make recommendations for security policy at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This list was designed to be concise rather than comprehensive. These documents provide an overview of policy and recommendations as well as context, but should not be considered a complete review of relevant literature.

LEGISLATION

U.S. Public Law 106-65. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000. 106th Cong., 1st session, 1999.

This public law establishes the National Nuclear Security Administration within DOE. It also implements several recommendations from the Select Committee on National Security and Military Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China.

U.S. Congress. House. Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000. 106th Cong., 1st session, 1999. HR.1555.

This bill contributed to the debate regarding the reorganization of DOE by outlining the organization and responsibilities of the Agency for Nuclear Stewardship.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents." Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9704.
×

DOE POLICY DOCUMENTS

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories. Policy on hosting a foreign visitor (UCRL-MI-133770), May 13, 1999.

This document describes the requirements for compliance with the laboratory's policy regarding export controls and foreign travel and protection of technical data.

Richardson, W., Secretary of Energy. Memorandum to heads of departmental elements and contractor organizations on unclassified foreign visits and assignments, July 14, 1999.

These directives formalize the changes to DOE policy and procedures, provide additional clarification, and extend their applicability to other facilities. This document specifically exempts facilities that do not perform classified work and are therefore not subject to the requirements of DOE N 142.1.

Richardson, W., Secretary of Energy. Memorandum to heads of departmental elements and contractor organizations on DOE export control guidelines, July 28, 1999.

This memorandum describes DOE policy on reviews for Export Controlled Information—a category of information defined as unclassified technical information whose export is subject to export control and whose unrestricted public dissemination could help proliferants or potential adversaries of the United States.

U.S. Department of Energy. List of sensitive subjects, July 1999.

This is a list of areas of technical subject matter or technologies containing sensitive information. The list identifies subjects related to the development and production of weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, chemical, and biological) and their delivery systems (including missiles), conventional weapons, and other technologies deemed significant to the national security of the United States.

U.S. Department of Energy. Policy on unclassified foreign visits and assignments (DOE P 142.1), July 13, 1999.

This policy outlines the responsibilities of those hosting a foreign visitor and the steps required, such as obtaining approval, checking the visitor's background, and protecting sensitive information.

U.S. Department of Energy. Notice on unclassified foreign visits and assignments (DOE N 142.1), July 13, 1999.

This document supplements DOE Policy P 142.1 by defining terms and describing the requirements for background and indices checks for all unclassified

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents." Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9704.
×

foreign visits and assignments at DOE field and contractor site (including DOE laboratories), among other security measures.

DOE NEWS RELEASES AND UPDATES

U.S. Department of Energy. Richardson unveils security reform package. News bulletin R-99-111, May 11, 1999.

This news release describes the Office of Security and Emergency Operations and the Office of Foreign Visits and Assignments Policy and their responsibilities. Supporting documents include: the DOE security reform package, the status of DOE counterintelligence measures and counterintelligence plan implementation, and further enhancements to DOE cybersecurity.

REPORTS ON AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SECURITY AT DOE LABORATORIES

President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, Special Investigative Panel. 1999. Science at its Best, Security at its Worst: A Report on Security Problems at the U.S. Department of Energy (the “Rudman Report”). Washington, D.C.: White House.

This report is an analysis of the structural and managerial problems in DOE security and counterintelligence operations that makes recommendations for reform in policy and organization.

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, Openness Advisory Panel. 1997. Responsible Openness: An Imperative for the Department of Energy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

This report examined the status and strategic direction for DOE's classification and declassification policies and programs, as well as other aspects of its efforts to enhance openness.

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, Working Group on Foreign Visits and Assignments. 1999. Report of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Working Group on Foreign Visits and Assignments. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.

This report reviewed the policies and practices related to foreign visitors and assignees at DOE's laboratories and assessed the balance between security and science.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents." Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9704.
×

U.S. Central Intelligence Agency Review Panel. 1999. The Intelligence Community's Damage Assessment on the Implications of China's Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Information on the Development of Future Chinese Weapons (the “Jeremiah Report”). Langley, Va.: U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.

This panel examined the extent to which the People's Republic of China was able to obtain classified information and the contribution this made to China's nuclear program.

U.S. Congress. House. Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China. A Report of the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China (the “Cox Report”). 105th Cong., 2nd session, 1998. H.Report 105-851.

This report describes lapses in security policy and export control that the People's Republic of China could have used to improve its nuclear weapons program. Please note that the committee reviewed the unclassified version of the Cox Report as released in 1999.

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1997. DOE Needs to Improve Controls over Foreign Visitors to Weapons Laboratories. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1998. DOE Needs to Improve Controls over Foreign Visitors to its Weapons Laboratories. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. General Accounting Office. 1998. Problems in DOE's Foreign Visitor Program Persist. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

These reports describe the DOE security policies in regard to foreign visitors and assignees and the extent to which the DOE laboratories enforce them.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents." Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9704.
×
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents." Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9704.
×
Page 27
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents." Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9704.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: U.S. Department of Energy Security Policies: Relevant Documents." Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9704.
×
Page 29
Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories Get This Book
×
 Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Controls at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This report addresses consequences of current and proposed restrictions on international contacts by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) national laboratories and explores methods of best serving national security through positive new scientific advances facilitated by international communication among scientists, through scientific contacts to further non-proliferation, and through careful protection of crucial classified information from foreign espionage. The report summarizes a symposium that examined: the role of the DOE's national laboratories in national security and the contributions by foreign laboratories and scientists, proposals for amending security policies of the weapons laboratories in regard to contact with foreign laboratories and scientists, and the risks and benefits of scientific openness in this context. Finally, the report reviews current policies and proposals designed to enhance security at the weapons laboratories, primarily those related to restrictions on foreign contacts by DOE scientists.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!