| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
Committee to Review the R&D Strategy for Biomass-Derived Ethanol and Biodiesel Transportation Fuels
Board on Energy and Environmental Systems
Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems
National Research Council
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C.
OCR for page R2
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
This report and the study on which it is based were supported by Contract No. DE-FG01-98EE50561 from the U.S. Department of Energy. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.
Available in limited supply from:
Board on Energy and Environmental Systems
National Research Council
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
HA-270
Washington, D.C. 20418
202-334-3505
Additional copies are available for sale from:
National Academy Press
Box 285 2101 Constitution Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20055 800-624-6242 or 202-334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area) http://www.nap.edu
International Standard Book Number: 0-309-06779-0
Copyright 1999 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
OCR for page R3
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Engineering
Institute of Medicine
National Research Council
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.
OCR for page R4
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE R&D STRATEGY FOR BIOMASS-DERIVED ETHANOL AND BIODIESEL TRANSPORTATION FUELS
DAVID L. MORRISON (chair),
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (retired), Cary, North Carolina
GARY COLEMAN,
University of Maryland, College Park
BRUCE E. DALE,
Michigan State University, East Lansing
ANTHONY J. FINIZZA,
Atlantic Richfield Company (retired), Los Angeles, California
ROBERT HALL,
Amoco Corporation (retired), Winfield, Illinois
DONALD JOHNSON,
NAE,1 Grain Processing Corporation, Muscatine, Iowa
ROBERTA NICHOLS,
NAE, Ford Motor Company (retired), Plymouth, Michigan
DANIEL SPERLING,
University of California, Davis
STEVEN H. STRAUSS,
Oregon State University, Corvallis
Liaison from the Board on Energy and Environmental Systems
KATHLEEN C. TAYLOR,
General Motors Corporation, Warren, Michigan
Project Staff
JAMES ZUCCHETTO, director,
Board on Energy and Environmental Systems
MARY JANE LETAW, program officer and study director
CRISTELLYN BANKS, project assistant
1
NAE = National Academy of Engineering.
OCR for page R5
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
BOARD ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
ROBERT L. HIRSCH (chair),
Advanced Power Technologies, Inc., Washington, D.C.
RICHARD MESERVE (vice chair),
Covington and Burling, Washington, D.C.
RICHARD E. BALZHISER,
NAE,1 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. (retired), Menlo Park, California
EVERETT H. BECKNER,
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Albuquerque, New Mexico
E. GAIL DE PLANQUE,
NAE, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (retired), Potomac, Maryland
WILLIAM L. FISHER,
NAE, University of Texas, Austin
CHRISTOPHER FLAVIN,
Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C.
WILLIAM FULKERSON,
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
ROY G. GORDON,
NAS,2 Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
EDWIN E. KINTNER,
NAE, GPU Nuclear Corporation (retired), Norwich, Vermont
ROBERT W. SHAW, JR.,
Arete[Aretê] Corporation, Center Harbor, New Hampshire
K. ANNE STREET,
Alexandria, Virginia
JAMES SWEENEY,
Stanford University, Stanford, California
KATHLEEN C. TAYLOR,
NAE, General Motors Corporation, Warren, Michigan
JACK WHITE,
The Winslow Group, LLC, Fairfax, Virginia
JOHN J. WISE,
NAE, Mobil Research and Development Company (retired), Princeton, New Jersey
Liaisons from the Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems
RUTH M. DAVIS,
NAE, Pymatuning Group, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia
LAWRENCE T. PAPAY,
NAE, Bechtel Technology and Consulting, San Francisco, California
Staff
JAMES ZUCCHETTO, director
RICHARD CAMPBELL, program officer
SUSANNA CLARENDON, financial associate
CRISTELLYN BANKS, project assistant
1
NAE = National Academy of Engineering.
2
NAS = National Academy of Sciences.
OCR for page R6
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
This page in the original is blank.
OCR for page R7
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
Acknowledgments
The committee wishes to thank the representatives from the U.S. Department of Energy and the national laboratories who contributed significantly of their time and effort to this National Research Council study by giving presentations at meetings and responding promptly to committee requests for information (see Appendix C). The committee also acknowledges the valuable contributions of organizations outside the U.S. Department of Energy that provided information relevant to the study. Finally, the chairman wishes to recognize the committee members and the staff of the Board on Energy and Environmental Systems of the National Research Council for their hard work organizing and planning committee meetings and for their individual efforts in gathering information and writing sections of the report.
This report has been reviewed by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council's Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the authors and the NRC in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The content of the review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the follow individuals for their participation in the review of this report: William G. Agnew, General Motors Corporation (retired); Dan Binkley, Colorado State University; David Bodde, University of MissouriKansas City; Toby Bradshaw, University of Washington College of Forest Resources; Robert Epperly, Epperly Associates, Inc.; Michael R. Ladisch, Purdue University; Ronald A. Sills, BP Amoco P.L.C.; Charles E. Wyman, Dartmouth College Thayer School of Engineering.
While the individuals listed above have provided constructive comments and suggestions, responsibility for the final content of this report rests solely with the authoring committee and the NRC.
OCR for page R8
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
This page in the original is blank.
OCR for page R9
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
1
INTRODUCTION
5
Production and Manufacture of Bioethanol
5
Role of Government
6
Strategic Objectives for the Office of Fuels Development
7
Budget of the Office of Fuels Development
9
Study Goals
9
2
CONTEXT FOR BIOMASS-DERIVED FUELS
11
Historical Background and Public Policy
11
Advantages and Disadvantages of Biofuels
11
Alternative Fuels and Vehicle Technologies
14
Markets for Biomass-Derived Ethanol
14
Manufacturing Biomass-Derived Ethanol
18
Conclusions
20
3
FEEDSTOCK DEVELOPMENT
22
Program Objectives and Overview
22
Allocation of Funding
23
Shift in Strategic Direction
23
Genomics
24
Conclusions
26
Recommendations
26
4
PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES
27
Program Objectives and Overview
27
Back to Fundamentals
27
Improving Conversion
28
Opportunities for Coproducts
29
Biodiesel
30
Conclusions
30
Recommendations
30
5
CROSSCUTTING OPPORTUNITIES
32
Systems Analysis
32
Technology Integration
32
Increasing Links
33
Improved Peer Review
33
OCR for page R10
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
REFERENCES
34
APPENDICES
A Biographical Sketches of Committee Members
39
B Office of Fuels Development Fiscal Year 1999 Budget
41
C Committee Meetings and Other Activities
44
D Barriers to Using Ethanol
45
E Major Components of a Poplar Genomics Initiative
47
OCR for page R11
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
Tables, Figures, and Boxes
Tables
1-1
Funding Allocations for the Office of Fuels Development Biofuels Program
10
2-1
Markets for Cellulosic Biomass-Derived Fuels
15
2-2
Cost Estimates for Bioethanol Manufacturing
18
3-1
Participants in the Feedstock Development Program, 1996-1999
23
3-2
Allocation of Funds for Feedstock Development Projects
24
Figures
1-1
Relative costs of processing steps in the NREL bioethanol process of 1991
7
1-2
Appropriations for the National Biomass Ethanol Program
9
2-1
Estimated manufacturing costs and the market value of cellulosic biomass-derived ethanol
20
4-1
Schematic diagram of the conversion of biomass feedstock to ethanol fuel
28
Box
3-1
What Is Genomics?
25
OCR for page R12
Review of the Research Strategy for Biomass-Derived Transportation Fuels
This page in the original is blank.