Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

Rights & Permissions Free Resources PDF FORMAT Display this book on your site! Related Titles Technical Bases for Yucca Mountain Standards Ground Water at Yucca Mountain:How High Can It Rise? Other Related Titles Comments on Proposed Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada (1999) Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "Attachment B: List of Report Reviewers." Comments on Proposed Radiation Protection Standards for Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1999. Please select a format: Page 18   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. ATTACHMENT B LIST OF REPORT REVIEWERS This letter report has been reviewed in draft form by individualschosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, inaccordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee.The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and criticalcomments that will assist the institution in making the publishedreport as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutionalstandards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the studycharge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidentialto protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish tothank the following individuals for their participation in the reviewof this report: Jean Bahr, University of Wisconsin Robert Bernero, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (retired) Thomas Graff, Environmental Defense Fund Frank Parker, Vanderbilt University Thomas Pigford, University of California, Berkeley (retired) Jonathan Price, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Chris Whipple, ICF Kaiser, Inc. Gilbert White, University of Colorado Jeffrey Wong, California EPA Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructivecomments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusionsor recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the reportbefore its release. The review of this report was overseen by KaiLee, appointed by the Commission on Geosciences, Environment, andResources, and Donald Horning, appointed by the Report Review Committee,who were responsible for making certain that an independent examinationof this report was carried out in accordance with NRC proceduresand that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibilityfor the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoringcommittee and the NRC. Page 18 Letter Report (1-16) Attachment A: Board on Radioactive Waste Management (17-17) Attachment B: List of Report Reviewers (18-18)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 18
ATTACHMENT B LIST OF REPORT REVIEWERS This letter report has been reviewed in draft form by individualschosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, inaccordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee.The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and criticalcomments that will assist the institution in making the publishedreport as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutionalstandards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the studycharge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidentialto protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish tothank the following individuals for their participation in the reviewof this report: Jean Bahr, University of Wisconsin Robert Bernero, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (retired) Thomas Graff, Environmental Defense Fund Frank Parker, Vanderbilt University Thomas Pigford, University of California, Berkeley (retired) Jonathan Price, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Chris Whipple, ICF Kaiser, Inc. Gilbert White, University of Colorado Jeffrey Wong, California EPA Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructivecomments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusionsor recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the reportbefore its release. The review of this report was overseen by KaiLee, appointed by the Commission on Geosciences, Environment, andResources, and Donald Horning, appointed by the Report Review Committee,who were responsible for making certain that an independent examinationof this report was carried out in accordance with NRC proceduresand that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibilityfor the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoringcommittee and the NRC.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

fund list