ATTACHMENT B

LIST OF REPORT REVIEWERS

This letter report has been reviewed in draft form by individualschosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, inaccordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee.The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and criticalcomments that will assist the institution in making the publishedreport as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutionalstandards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the studycharge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidentialto protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish tothank the following individuals for their participation in the reviewof this report:

Jean Bahr, University of Wisconsin

Robert Bernero, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (retired)

Thomas Graff, Environmental Defense Fund

Frank Parker, Vanderbilt University

Thomas Pigford, University of California, Berkeley (retired)

Jonathan Price, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology

Chris Whipple, ICF Kaiser, Inc.

Gilbert White, University of Colorado

Jeffrey Wong, California EPA

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructivecomments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusionsor recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the reportbefore its release. The review of this report was overseen by KaiLee, appointed by the Commission on Geosciences, Environment, andResources, and Donald Horning, appointed by the Report Review Committee,who were responsible for making certain that an independent examinationof this report was carried out in accordance with NRC proceduresand that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibilityfor the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoringcommittee and the NRC.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 18
ATTACHMENT B LIST OF REPORT REVIEWERS This letter report has been reviewed in draft form by individualschosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, inaccordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee.The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and criticalcomments that will assist the institution in making the publishedreport as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutionalstandards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the studycharge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidentialto protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish tothank the following individuals for their participation in the reviewof this report: Jean Bahr, University of Wisconsin Robert Bernero, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (retired) Thomas Graff, Environmental Defense Fund Frank Parker, Vanderbilt University Thomas Pigford, University of California, Berkeley (retired) Jonathan Price, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Chris Whipple, ICF Kaiser, Inc. Gilbert White, University of Colorado Jeffrey Wong, California EPA Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructivecomments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusionsor recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the reportbefore its release. The review of this report was overseen by KaiLee, appointed by the Commission on Geosciences, Environment, andResources, and Donald Horning, appointed by the Report Review Committee,who were responsible for making certain that an independent examinationof this report was carried out in accordance with NRC proceduresand that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibilityfor the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoringcommittee and the NRC.