|
Items in cart [0] |
Questions? Call 888-624-8373 |
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 207
APPENDIX C
LETTER TO EVALUATORS
COMMITTEE ON AN ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY-RELATED CHARACTERISTICS
OF RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATES
Established by the Conference Board of Associated Research Councils
Office of the Staff Director / National Research Council / 2101 Constitution A~cr~uc, N.W. / Washington, D.C. 2041J
April 14, 1981
Dear
As you may already know, our committee has undertaken an assessment
of research-doctorate programs in U.S. universities. The study in exam-
ining approximately 2,650 programs in 31 fields in the arts and humanities,
biological sciences, engineering, physical and mathematical sciences, and
social sciences. A study prospectus is provided on the reverse of this
page. You have been selected from a faculty list furnished by your institu-
tion to evaluate programs offering research-doctorates in the field of
Chemistry.
On the first page of the attached form is a list of the 145 programs
that are being evaluated in this field. These programs produce more than 90
percent of the doctorate recipients in the field. In order to keep the task
manageable, you are being asked to consider a randomly selected subset of
50 of these programs. These are designated with an asterisk in the list on
the next page and are presented in random sequence on the evaluation sheets
that follow. Please read the accompanying instructions carefully before
attempting your evaluations.
We ask that you complete the attached survey~form and return it in the
enclosed envelope within the next three weeks. The evaluations you and
your colleagues render will constitute an important component of this study.
Your prompt attention to this request will be very much appreciated by our
committee.
Sincerely, ~q
As_
in'
~4 I~
Lyle Jones
For the Study Committee
Enclosures
COMMITTEE MEMBERS Marcus Alexis Winfred P. Lehmann Kumar Patel
Robert M. Bock Saunders Mac Lane Michael 1. Pelczar, Jr.
Lyle V. Jones, Co-Chairman Philip E. Converse Nancy S. Milburn Jerome B. Schneewind
Gardner Lindzey, Co-Chairman lames H. M. Henderson Lincoln E. Moses Duane C. Spriestersbach
Paul A. Albrecht Ernest S. Kuh lames C. Olson Harriet A. Zuckerman
207
OCR for page 208
208
RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF REGISTRY
(* DESIGNATES THE PROGRAMS WHICH YOU ARE ASKED TO EVALUATE ON-THE FOLLOWING PAGES.)
INSTITUTION - DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT
*
*
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON - POLYMER SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, TUSCALOOSA - CHEMISTRY
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, TEMPE - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, TUCSON - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, FAYETTEVILLE - CHEMISTRY
ATLANTA UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
AUBURN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY, WACO - CHEMISTRY
BOSTON COLLEGE - CHEMISTRY
BOSTON UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
BROWN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE - CHEMISTRY
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ - CHEMISTRY
CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI - CHEMISTRY
CUNY, THE GRADUATE SCHOOL - CHEMISTRY
CLARK UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
CLARKSON COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY - CHEMISTRY
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY AND GEOLOGY
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, FT COLLINS - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER - CHEMISTRY
* COLUMBIA UNIV-GRAD SCHOOL OF ARTS & SCI - CHEMISTRY
* UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, STORRS - CHEMISTRY
CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE, NEWARK - CHEMISTRY
* UNIVERSITY OF DENVER - CHEMISTRY
DREXEL UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
* DUKE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
EMORY UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA, ATHENS - CHEMISTRY
HARVARD UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY/CHEMICAL PHYSICS
* UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CHEMISTRY
HOWARD UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO, MOSCOW - CHEMISTRY
ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - CHEMISTRY
UNIV OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, CHICAGO CIRCLE - CHEMISTRY
INDIANA UNIVERSITY, BLOOMINGTON - CHEMISTRY
INST OF PAPER CHEMISTRY (APPLETON, WI) - CHEMISTRY
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, AMES - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, IOWA CITY - CHEMISTRY
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, MANHATTAN - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS - PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - CHEMISTRY
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, BATON ROUGE - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSItY OF NEW ORLEANS - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE - CHEMISTRY
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK - CHEMISTRY
~ MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE.OF TECHNOLOGY - CHEMISTRY
* UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST - CHEMISTRY
* UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI (FLORIDA) - CHEMISTRY
OCR for page 209
209
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST LANSING - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, COLUMBIA - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, KANSAS CITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, ROLLA - CHEMISTRY
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY, BOZEMAN - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, LINCOLN - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, ALBUOUEROUE - CHEMISTRY
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL - CHEMISTRY
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, RALEIGH - CHEMISTRY
NORTH DAKOTA StATE UNIVERSITY, FARGO - CHEMISTRY/POLYMERS COATINGS
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA, GRAND FORKS - CHEMISTRY
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY, DENTON - CHEMISTRY
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, DE KALB - CHEMISTRY
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - CHEMISTRY
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
OHIO UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
- OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY, STILLWATER - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, EUGENE - CHEMISTRY
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, COVALLIS - CHEMISTRY
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - CHEMISTRY
POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF NEW YORK - CHEMISTRY
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
PURDUE UNIVERSITY, WEST LAFAYETTE - CHEMISTRY
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND - CHEMISTRY
RICE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER - CHEMISTRY
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, NEW BRUNSWICK - CHEMISTRY
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, NEWARK - CHEMIStRY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - CHEMISTRY
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, CARBONDALE - CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIV OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI, HATTIESBURG - CHEMISTRY
STANFORD UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, GAINESVILLE - CHEMISTRY
· FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY, TALLAHASSEE - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, TAMPA - CHEMISTRY
SUNY AT BINGHAMTON - CHEMISTRY
SUNY AT BUFFALO - CHEMISTRY
SUNY AT STONY BROOK - CHEMISTRY
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
SUNY, COL OF ENVIR SCI ~ FORESTRY (SYRACUSE) - CHEMISTRY
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE - CHEMISTRY
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, LUBBOCK - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN - CHEMISTRY
- TULANE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, SALT LAKE CITY - CHEMISTRY
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY, LOGAN - CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT - CHEMISTRY
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIV - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - CHEMISTRY
* WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, PULLMAN - CHEMISTRY
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY (ST LOUIS) - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE - CHEMISTRY
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MADISON - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MILWAUKEE - CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING - CHEMISTRY
- YALE UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY
OCR for page 210
210
INSTRUCTIONS
At the top of the next page please provide the 1nformat10n requested on the
highest degree you hold and your current field of spec1altzat10n. You may be assured
that all information you furnish on the survey form is to be used for purposes of
statistical Rescript ton only and that the confidont1allty of your responses w111 be
protcated.
On the pages that follow you are asked to judge 50 programs (prceontod in
random sequence) that offer the rosearch-doctorate. Each program is to be evaluated
in terms of: (1) scholarly quality of program faculty; (2) effectivenoes of program
in educating research scholars/sc1cnt1sts; and (3) change in program quality in the
last five years (see below). Although the asecesmont is 11m1tod to those factors
our committee recogn1zes that other factors arc relevant to the quality of doctoral
programs, and that graduate programs verve important purposes in addition to that
of cUucat1ng doctoral candidates.
A 11st of the faculty members signf1cantly 1nvolvod in each program, the name
of the academic unit in which the program is offered, and the number of doctoratoe
awarded in that program during the last five years have been printed on the survey
form (whenever available). Although this 1nformat10n has been furn1shod to us
by the insittut10n and is bol1cved to be accurate, it has not been verif10d by our
study committee and may have a few omiss10ns, m1sspcil1ngs, or other errors.
Boforo marking your responses on the survey form, you may find it helpful to
look aver the full set of programs you are being asked to evaluate. In making your
Judgments about each program, please keep in mind the following instruct10ns:
(1) Scholarly Quality of Program Faculty. Check the box next to
the term that most closely corrosponds to your Judgment of the
quality of faculty in the rcsoarch-doctorat. program doscr1bod.
Cons1der only the scholarly competenac and ach10vomonts of the
faculty. It is suggested that no more than five programs be
oes1gnated "dist1nguished."
i~ ·
Check the box next to the term that most closely corresponds
to your Judgment of the doctoral program's effectiveness in
·ducat1ng research scholars/sc1ent1sts. Cons1der the access-
1b111ty of the faculty, the curricula, the 1nstruct10nal and
research fac111t1es, the quality of graduate students, the
performance of the graduates, and other factors that contribute
to the offect1veness of the research-doctorate program.
(3) Chance in Prooram Oualitv in Last Five Years. Check the box
next to the term that most closely corresponds to your ast1-
mate of the change that has taken place in the research-
doctorate program in the last five years. Cons1der both the
scholarly quality of the program faculty and the effectiveness
of the program in educating research scholars/scienttsts. Com-
nAr~. the Nina] it Of the nrnaram tadav with its anal ttv five. vests
,_ . _ . ._ ___ . . ~ _ . . . _ ~ . _,,. _... _ __.,
ago--n the change in the programs relative standing among
other programs in the field.
In assessing each of these factors, mark the category UDon't know well enough
to evaluate" if you are unfamiliar with that aspect of the program. It is quite
possible that for some programs you may be knowledgeable about the scholarly quality
of the faculty, but not about the effectiveness of the program or change in program
quality.
For each of the programs tdentifled, you are also asked to indicate the extent
to Welch you are familiar with the work of members of the program faculty. For example,
if you recognize only a very small fraction of the faculty, you Should mark the
category Little or no fam111arity."
Please be certain that you have provided a set of responses for each of the
programs identified on the following pages. The fully completed survey form should
be returned in the enclosed envelope to:
Committee on an Assessment of Qual1ty-Related
Characteristics of Research-Doctorate Programs
National Research Council, UH-638
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20418
Our committee will be most appreciative of your thoughtful assessment of these rosoarch-
doctorate programs. We welcome any comments you may wish to append to the comported
survey f arm.
OCR for page 211
211
PLEASE PROVIDE THE fOLLOWING INFORMATION:
HIGHEST DEGREE YOU HOLD: ( ) PH.D. ( ) OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):
YEAR OF HIGHEST DEGREE:
INSTITUTION OF HIGHEST DEGREE:
YOUR CURRENT FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION (CHECK ONLY ONE):
A. ( ) ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
B. ( ) BIOCHEMISTRY
C. ( ) INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
D. ( ) ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
E. ( ) PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY
F. ( ) PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
G. ( ) POLYMER CHEMISTRY
H. ( ) THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY
I. ( ) CHEMISTRY. GENERAL
d. ( ) OtHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):
INSTITUTION:
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT:
TOTAL W CTORATES AWARDED 1876-80: 32
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, FAYETTEVILLE
CHEH! STRY
PROFESSORS: Robbin C. ANDERSON, George D. BLYHOLDER, A. Wallace CORDES, Arthur d. FRY
dames F. HINTON, Lester C. HOWICK, Dale A. JOHNSON, P. K. KURODA, Walter L. MEYER,
Francis S. MILLETT, Lothar SCHAfER, Samuel SIEGEL, Leslie B. SIMS, John A. THOMA
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Col 1 is R. GEREN
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Neil T. ALLISON, Danny J. DAVIS. Bill DURHAM. Robert B. GREEN,
Roger E. KOEPPE. David W. PAUL, Norbert d. PIENTA
SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
I- ( )
2. ( )
3. ( )
4. ( )
5. ( )
6. (
DJSTINGVJSHED
STRONG
GOOD
ADEQUATE
MARG INAL
NOT SUFF I C I ENT FOR DOCTORA L
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH JO EVALUATE
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( J
2. ( )
3. ( )
CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY
SOME fAMILIARJTY
L I TT LE OR NO F AMI L I ART T Y
FORH NO. SAMP-C~
FORM N . SAHP-01
1
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE
2 . ( ) RE ASONAB L Y OF FECT I VE
3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
4. ( ) NOT EfFECTIVE
O . ( ) DON' T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
1 . ( ) BETTER tHAN f IVf YEARS AGO
2. ( ) L JTtLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST f JOE YEAR
3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
O . ( ) DON ' T KNOW WE L L ENOUGH TO EV ALUATE
OCR for page 212
212
INSTItUTSON: SUNY, COL OF ENVIR SCI & FORESTRY (SYRACUSE)
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: CHEMISTRY
TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 21
FORM NO. SAHP-02
PROFESSORS: Robert T. LALONDE, John A. MEYER; Anatole SARKO, Conrad SCHUERCH.
Robert M. SILVERSTEIN, dohannes SAID, Kenneth d. SMITH Jr, Stuart W. TANENBAUM, Tore E. TIMELL
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Paul M. CALUWE, Wilbur M. CAMPBELL, Michael FLASHNER, Gideon LEVIN
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS : David L. JOHNSON
SCHOLARLY W ALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) DISTINGUISHED
2. ( ) STRONG
3. ( ) GOOD
4. ( ) ADEQUATE
5. ( ) MARGINAL
6. ( ) NOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EYALUArE
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) CONSIDERABLE fAMILIARITY
2. ( ) SOME fAMILIARIrY
3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO fAMILIARITY
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
1. ( )
2. ( )
3. ( )
4. ( )
EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE
REASONABLY EFFECTIVE
MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
NOT EFFECTIVE
O. ( J DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
1. ( ) BETtER THAN F rvE YEARS AGO
2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAS: FIVE YEAR
3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
SNStITUTSON: VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNSV
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC WIT: CHEMISTRY
TOTAL DpCTORATES AWARDED 1978-80: 65
FORH NO. SAP-03
PROFESSORS: H. d. ACHE, L. K. BRICK dr, A. F. CLIFFORD, R. F. DESSY, d. G. DILLARD, J. D. GRAYBEAL
M. HUDLICKY, D. G. KINGSTON, U. G. MASON, d. E. MCGRATH, H. M. MCNAIR, H. A. OGLIARUSO,
J. C. SCHUG, L. T. TAYLOR, J. P. WIGHTMAN, J. F. WOLFE
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: H. M. BELL, H. C. DORN, P. E. FIELD, G. SANZONE, H. D. SMITH, T. C. WARD
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: B. R. BARTSCHMID, H. O. FINKLEA, B. E. HANSON, P. d. HARRIS, R. A. HOLTON,
d. W. VIERS
OTHER STAFF: D. G. LARSEN, F. M. VANDAMME
SCHOLARLY W ALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) DISTINGUISHED
2. ( ) STRONG
3. ( ) GOOD
4. ( ) ADEQUATE
5. ( ) MARGINAL
6. ( ) Nor SUfFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION
0. ( )
DON' r KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
( ) CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY
2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY
3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE
2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE
3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
4. ( ) NOT EfFECrlVE
O. ( ) DON' r KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
1. ( ) BEtTER tHAN FIVE YEARS AGO
2. ( ) LITTLE on NO CHANGE IN LAST FIVE YEAR
3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
O. ( ) DON 'I KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUAtE
Representative terms from entire chapter:
program faculty
