Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$42.00
Web:$37.80
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $32.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Mathematical and Physical Sciences (1982)
National Research Council (NRC)

Page
33
bottomleft bottomright
Page
33

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 33
m Cheniis~y Programs In this chapter 145 research-doctorate programs in chemistry are assessed. These programs, according to the information supplied by their universities, have accounted for 7,304 doctoral degrees awarded during the FY1976-80 period--approximately 93 percent of the aggregate number of chemistry doctorates earned from U.S. universities in this five-year span.t On the average, 75 full-time and part-time students intending to earn doctorates were enrolled in a program in December 1980, with an average faculty size of 23 members.2 The 145 programs, listed in Table 3.1, represent 143 different universities-- the University of Akron and the University of Kansas each have two chemistry programs included in the assessment. All but three of the programs were initiated prior to 1970. In addition to the 143 universities represented in this discipline, another 4 were initially identified as meeting the criteria3 for inclusion in the assessment: University of California--San Francisco Fordham University Lehigh University SUNY at Albany Chemistry programs at these four institutions have not in the evaluations in this discipline since in each case _ _ coordinator either indicated that the institution did not at time have a research-doctorate program in chemistry or failed to provide the information requested by the committee. Before examining individual program results presented in Table 3.1, the reader is urged to refer to Chapter II, in which each of the 16 been included She study that data from the NRC's Survey of Earned Doctorates indicate that 7,843 research doctorates in chemistry were awarded by U.S. universities between FY1976-and FY1980. 2 See the reported means for measures 03 and 01 in Table 3.2. 3As mentioned in Chapter I, the primary criterion for inclusion was that a university had awarded at least 13 doctorates in chemistry during the FY1976-78 period. 33

OCR for page 34
34 measures used in the assessment is discussed. Summary statistics describing every measure are given in Table 3.2. For all but two measures, data are reported for at least 139 of the 145 chemistry programs. For measure 12, a composite index of the size of a university library, data are available for 87 programs; for measure 14, total university expenditures for research in this discipline, data are available for 96 programs. The programs not evaluated on these two measures are typically smaller--in terms of faculty size and graduate student enrollment--than other chemistry programs. Were data on measures 12 and 14 available for all 145 programs, it is likely that the reported means for these two measures would be appreciably lower (and that some of the correlations of these measures with others would be higher). Tntercorrelations among the 16 measures {Pearson product-moment coefficients) are given in Table 3.3. Of particular note are the high positive correlations of the measures of program size (01-03) with measures of publication records (15, 16) and reputational survey ratings (08, 09, and 11~. Figure 3.1 illustrates the relation between the mean rating of the scholarly quality of faculty (measure 08) and the number of faculty members (measure 01) for each of the 14S programs in chemistry. Figure 3.2 plots the mean rating of program effectiveness (measure 09) against the total number of FY1976-80 program graduates (measure 02~. Although in both figures there is a significant positive correlation between program size and reputational rating, it is quite apparent that some of the smaller programs received high mean ratings and that some of the larger programs received low mean ratings. Table 3.4 describes the 301 faculty members who participated in the evaluation of chemistry programs. These individuals constituted 69 percent of those asked to respond to the survey in this discipline and 9 percent of the faculty population in the 145 research-doctorate programs being evaluated.. A majority of the survey participants were organic or physical chemists and held the rank of full professor. Almost three-fourths of them had earned their highest degree prior to 1970. \ To assist the reader in interpreting results of the survey evaluations, estimated standard errors have been computed for mean ratings of the scholarly quality of the faculty in 14S chemistry programs (and are given in Table 3.1~. For each program the mean rating and an associated Confidence interval" of 1.5 standard errors are illustrated in Figure 3.3 (listed in order of highest to lowest mean rating). In comparing two Programs. if their confidence intervals do not overlap, one may safely conclude that there is a significant difference in their mean ratings at a .05 level of significance.5 From this figure it is also apparent that one should . _ 4 See Table 2.3 in Chapter TI. 5 See pp. 29-31 for a discussion of the interpretation of mean ratings and associated confidence intervals.

OCR for page 35
35 have somewhat more confidence in the accuracy of the mean ratings of higher-rated programs than lower-rated programs. This generalization results primarily from the fact that evaluators are not as likely to be familiar with the less prestigious programs, and consequently the mean ratings of these programs are usually based on fewer survey responses.

OCR for page 36
36 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Characteristics of Prog Program Size Program Graduates No. University - Department/Academic Unit (01) (02) (03) (04) (05)(06) (07) 001. Akron, University of 17 18 54 .32 7.1.87 .17 Chemistry 44 42 4 7 5 8 3460 3 8 002. Akron, University of 11 58 102 .39 6.4.81 .05 Polymer Science 38 52 54 64 4455 30 003. Alabama, University of-Tuscaloosa 16 20 31 .31 6.5.60 .13 Chemistry 43 43 43 5 7 4235 36 004. American University 11 32 49 .11 8.5.58 .13 Chemistry* 38 46 46 39 1533 35 005. Arizona State University-Tempe 24 45 86 .37 6.4 .75 .38 Chemistry 51 49 52 62 43 49 53 006. Arizona, University of-Tucson 28 51 92 .22 5.8 .76 .31 Chemistry 55 50 53 49 52 50 49 007. Arkansas, University-Fayetteville 22 32 28 .34 6.4 .84 .24 Chemistry 19 46 42 60 44 58 44 008. Atlanta University 8 NA 5 - - NA NA NA NA Chemistry * 35 39 009. Auburn University 17 10 51 .23 6.0 1.00 .33 Chemistry 44 41 46 50 49 73 50 010. Baylor University-Waco 12 14 10 .33 5.S .58 .25 Chemistry 39 42 40 59 55 33 44 011. Boston College 19 10 17 .33 6.2 .67 .50 Chemistry 46 41 41 59 46 41 62 012. Boston University 22 28 48 .39 6.4 .58 .31 Chemistry 49 45 46 64 43 33 49 013. Brandeis University 18 39 60 .15 5.9 .71 .27 Chemistry 45 4 7 4 8 42 50 45 46 014. Brigham Young University 21 21 21 .22 5.5 .77 .39 Chemistry 48 43 41 49 55 51 54 015. Brown University 23 59 74 .02 5.3 .80 .29 Chemistry 50 52 50 31 58 54 47 016. Bryn Mawr College 9 10 14 NA NA NA NO Chemistry 36 41 40 017. CUNY-Graduate School 56 69 90 .03 6.3 .65 .32 Chemistry 84 54 53 32 45 39 50 018. California Institute of Technology 27 112 171 .55 5.3 .91 .56 Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 54 64 66 79 58 65 67 019. California, University of-Santa Cruz 12 32 50 .15 5.6 .68 .42 Chemistry 39 46 46 43 55 42 56 020. California, University of-Berkeley 48 247 359 .21 5.1 .82 .38 Chemistry 76 95 96 48 61 56 54 * indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. nNA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available.

OCR for page 37
AL ,7 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry University Research Published Survey Ratings Prog Survey ResultsLibrary Support Articles Standard Error No. (08) (09) (10) (11) (12) (13)(14) (15)(16) (08) (09) (10) (11) 001. 1.6 1.1 1.2 0.4 NA .35NA 69 .12 .11 .08 .06 40 40 55 39 44 4842 002. 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.2 NA .55NA 69 .21 .15 .15 .05 48 50 55 35 53 4842 003. 1.8 1.2 0.9 0.6 - 1.3 .25NA 57 .10 .08 .11 .06 42 41 45 44 36 39 4644 004. 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 NA .18NA 11 .09 .11 .10 .05 34 32 43 36 36 3940 005. 2.5 1.8 1.1 0.7 -0.3 .631076 58 .09 .07 .08 .06 50 53 52 47 46 5744 4746 006. 2.9 2.0 1.3 1.0 0.9 .541269 84 .08 .05 .07 .07 54 56 62 53 58 5346 5149 007. 2.1 1.4 1.1 0.6 NA .551180 31 .08 .08 .07 .05 46 45 51 43 5345 4243 008. 0.5 0.3 NA 0.2 NA NA852 1 .10 .10 NA .05 29 26 34 42 3739 009. 1.4 1.0 1.0 0.4 NA .12NA 32 .10 .10 .10 .06 39 38 45 38 33 4244 010. 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.4 NA .00NA 31 .13 .10 .10 .06 38 37 40 38 27 4241 011. 1.6 1.0 1.1 0.5 NA .37NA 17 .10 .09 .06 .06 40 39 51 42 45 4041 012. 2.0 1.3 1.0 0.7 -0 .4 .46742 23 .08 .08 .08 .06 45 45 46 46 46 4941 4143 013. 3.1 2.0 0.9 1.0 NA .56769 58 .08 .06 .05 .06 56 57 44 54 5441 4751 014. 2.0 1.4 1.1 0.5 -0.6 .14775 51 .11 .10 .08 .06 45 45 51 42 43 3441 4544 015. 2.9 1.9 0.9 0.9 -1.1 .571036 48 .07 .05 .08 .07 54 54 41 50 39 5444 4546 016. 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.5 NA NANA 4 .12 .10 .08 .06 36 35 39 41 3840 017. 2.3 1.4 0.9 0.6 NA .32NA 112 .10 .10 .09 .06 4 8 46 43 44 43 5652 018. 4.9 2.8 1.2 1.8 NA .825297 163 .03 .04 .05 .04 74 73 56 73 6680 6474 019. 2.4 1.6 0.6 0.7 NA .25710 38 .10 .08 .09 .07 48 49 30 47 3941 4345 020. 4.9 2.8 1.3 1.9 2.2 .653717 205 .03 .04 .05 .03 74 72 63 74 72 5866 7175 NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every oroaram. raw values for each measure are reported: on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Since the scale used to compute measure (16) is entirely arbitrary, only values in standardized form are reported for this measure.

OCR for page 38
38 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Characteristics of Prog Program Size Program Graduates No. University - Department/Academic Unit (01) (02) (03) (04) (05) (06) t07) 021. California, University of-Davis 32 48 97 .21 5.6 .71 .41 Chemistry 59 49 54 48 55 45 56 022. California, University of-Irvine 20 39 84 .12 5.1 .78 .25 Chemistry 4 7 4 7 52 40 61 52 44 023. California, University of-Los Angeles 43 142 205 .18 5.6 .80 .34 Chemistry 71 71 71 45 54 54 51 024. California, University of-Riverside 18 28 44 .27 4.9 .81 .27 Chenistry 45 45 45 53 64 55 46 025. California, University of-San Diego 31 51 88 .28 5.5 .81 .58 Chemistry 5 8 50 52 54 55 55 68 026. California, University of-Santa Barbara 26 63 84 .09 6.6 .79 .43 Chemistry 53 53 52 37 41 53 57 027. Carnegie-Mellon University 22 32 40 .28 6.5 .87 .17 Chemistry 49 46 44 54 42 60 38 028. Case Western Reserve University 19 62 55 .19 5.6 .74 .44 Chemistry 46 53 47 47 54 48 58 029. Catholic University of America 12 23 22 .20 6.3 .65 .22 Chemistry 39 44 41 47 45 40 42 030. Chicago, University of 28 76 119 .28 5.9 .81 .47 Chemistry 55 56 5 7 54 50 55 60 031. Cincinnati, University of 29 39 87 .25 5.6 .81 .47 Chemistry 56 47 52 51 55 55 60 032. Clark University 9 8 15 NA NA NA NA Chemistry 36 40 40 033. Clarkson College of Technology 15 23 30 .20 7.0 .73 .15 Chemistry 42 44 43 47 35 47 37 034. Clemson University 17 17 21 .27 6.0 .80 .33 Chemistry and Geol ogy 44 42 41 53 49 54 50 035. Colorado State University-Fort Collins 24 40 86 .11 5.6 .89 .57 Chemistry 51 48 52 39 55 63 67 036. Colorado, University of 53 59 150 .21 5.0 .86 .46 Chemistry 81 52 62 48 63 60 59 037. Columbia University 17 94 130 .19 5.4 .86 .48 Chemistry 44 60 59 46 5 7 59 61 038. Connecticut, University of-Storrs 28 28 32 .15 6.3 .65 .15 Chemistry 55 45 43 43 44 40 3 7 039. Cornell University-Ithaca 29 121 153 .36 5.5 .88 .45 Chemistry 56 66 63 62 56 62 58 040. Delaware, University of-Newark 18 24 98 .22 6.0 .92 .58 Chemistry 45 44 54 49 49 66 6 8 * indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean ~ 50 and standard deviation = 10. GINA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available.

OCR for page 39
39 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Prog Survey Results No. (08) (09) (10) (11) 021. 022. 023. 024. 025. 3.0 1.9 55 56 3.1 1.9 56 56 4.4 2.5 69 67 2.6 1.6 51 49 3.7 2.1 62 59 026.3.2 57 027.2.9 54 028.2.8 53 029.1.2 36 030.4.4 69 031.2.7 52 032.1.1 35 033.1.9 44 034.1.4 39 035.3.2 56 036.3.3 58 037.4.6 70 038.2.1 46 039.4.4 68 040.2.5 49 2.0 56 1.8 53 1.8 53 0.9 36 2.5 67 1.8 54 0.7 33 1.4 46 1.0 39 1.9 55 2.0 57 2.7 70 1.5 47 2.5 67 1.8 52 - 1.2 1.0 59 54 1.3 1.1 60 56 1.3 1.6 61 68 0.9 0.9 42 52 1.2 1.2 56 59 1.4 1.2 66 59 0.8 1.0 37 52 0.5 1.0 26 53 0.7 0.4 31 39 0.9 1.6 44 69 1.1 1.0 53 53 0.8 0.3 38 37 1.0 0.8 46 47 1.2 0.6 56 43 1.7 1.3 80 60 1.2 l.2 58 58 1.3 1.6 60 67 1.0 0.5 48 42 1.1 1.7 53 70 1.1 0.8 50 49 University Research Librarv Suppor t (12) (13) (14) 0.6 .50 838 56 51 42 NA e 70 1277 61 46 2.0 .84 3573 69 67 65 -1.0 .72 626 39 62 40 -0 .0 . 68 4225 49 59 71 -O. . 48 NA -1.3 36 NA O .9 58 -0 .2 47 NA .691089 6044 .551957 5351 .581413 5547 .25NA 39 6564 .31814 4242 NANA NA.67926 5943 NA.35NA 44 -1.1.631774 385750 -0 .9.682544 416056 1.7.943531 6 77265 -0.5.251185 443945 1.6.723414 666264 NA.281015 4143 Published Survey Ratings Articles Standard Error (15) (16) 106 55 70 49 161 64 59 47 97 53 93 52 62 47 146 61 39 .79 3418 84 51 93 52 18 40 59 47 22 41 117 56 95 53 114 56 76 50 197 69 86 51 54 53 68 49 54 57 45 54 40 55 48 41 43 41 54 54 62 45 77 50 (08) (09) .07 .05 .08 .04 .05 .05 .09 .08 .07 .04 .07 .05 .08 .06 .07 .07 .11 .11 .06 .06 .08 .06 .13 .12 .11 .08 .10 .09 .08 .05 .07 .06 (10) (11) .06 .06 .07 .06 .06 .06 .08 .06 .06 .07 .06 .06 .07 .06 .08 .07 .09 .05 .06 .06 .07 .09 .06 .07 .11 .07 .06 .05 .07 .04 .06 .05 .07 .06 .05 .06 .09 .08 .08 .05 .06 .05 .06 .05 .09 .06 .07 .06 NOTE- On the f irr:t 1 in- Of rl;~t~ for ~v~rv nrr~ar~m row v;~1 bloc: f:^r Ah m~:lallr~ are Err. on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Since the scale used to compute measure (16) is entirely arbitrary, only values in standardized form are reported for this measure.

OCR for page 40
40 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Characteristics of Prog Program Size Program Graduates No. University - Department/Academic Unit (01) (02) (03) (04) (05) (06) (07) 041. Denver, University of 13 18 10 NA NA NA NA Chemistry 40 42 40 042. Drexel University 15 18 35 .07 6.3 .79 .07 Chemistry 42 42 44 36 45 53 32 043. Duke University 22 69 78 .22 4.9 .79 .41 Chemistry 49 54 51 49 64 53 56 044. Emory University 16 25 53 .50 5.2 .44 .26 Chemistry 43 44 46 74 60 19 45 045. Florida State University-Tallahassee 31 54 86 .26 5.7 .83 .45 Chemistry 58 51 52 53 52 57 59 046. Florida, University of-Gainesville 35 82 130 .14 6.0 .71 .31 Chemistry 62 57 59 42 49 45 49 047. Georgetown University 14 33 50 .35 5.9 .79 .35 Chemistry 41 46 46 61 50 53 52 048. Georgia Institute of Technology 24 63 67 .18 5.9 .73 .17 Chemistry 51 53 49 46 50 47 39 049. Georgia, University of-Athens 21 61 64 .16 5.6 .76 .29 Chemistry 48 52 48 43 54 51 47 050. Harvard University 24 144 174 .57 5.7 .86 .51 Chemistry/Chemical Physics 51 72 66 81 53 59 63 051. Hawaii, University of 17 33 26 .07 6.1 .78 .44 Chemistry 44 46 42 36 4 7 52 5 8 052. Houston, University of 23 62 83 .21 5.2 .65 .35 Chemistry 50 53 51 48 60 40 51 053. Howard University 20 41 40 .54 6.5 .65 .10 Chemistry 47 48 44 78 42 39 33 054. Idaho, University of-Moscow 12 18 17 .15 5.5 .65 .10 Chemistry 39 42 41 43 55 40 34 055. Illinois Institute of Technology 15 12 17 .50 5.7 .73 .27 Chemistry 42 41 41 74 53 47 46 056. Illinois, University of-Chicago Circle 20 50 52 .05 6.8 .68 .45 Chemistry 47 50 46 34 38 43 58 057. Illinois, University-Urbana/Champaign 43 227 294 .21 5.0 .83 .30 Chemistry 71 91 86 4 8 62 5 7 4 8 058. Indiana University-Bloomington 36 114 184 .24 5.2 .82 .36 Chemistry 63 65 6 8 51 60 56 52 059. Institute of Paper Chemistry-Appleton, Wi 12 31 16 .18 6.0 .77 .00 Chemistry 39 45 40 45 49 51 26 060. Iowa State University-Ames Chemistry * indicates program was initiated since 1970. 33 114 192 60 65 69 .16 5.7 44 53 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. .85 .23 59 43

OCR for page 41
41 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Prog No. 041. 042. (08) 1.4 38 1.5 39 043.2.9 54 044.2.3 47 045.3.3 57 046.3.2 57 047.1.9 44 048.3.1 55 049.3.0 55 050.4.9 74 051.2.2 47 052.2.6 51 053.1.8 43 054.1.6 41 055.1.9 43 056.2.2 47 057.4.5 69 058.3.7 62 059.1.2 36 060.3.6 60 Survey Results (09) 0.9 37 1.1 40 1.9 55 1.6 49 2.0 57 2.0 57 1.5 47 1.9 55 1.9 54 2.8 71 1.5 48 1.8 52 1.2 42 1.1 39 1.2 42 1.5 48 2.7 69 2.2 60 1.2 41 2.3 63 (10) (11) 1.1 0.4 53 40 1.1 0.6 51 43 1.2 0.9 58 50 1.5 0.7 70 47 1.1 1.2 51 58 1.2 1.1 56 55 1.0 0.5 49 41 1.2 1.1 56 55 1.0 1.1 47 55 0.8 1.7 40 71 0.4 54 3.0 80 1.1 0.7 -0.1 52 46 48 1.3 0.9 -0.9 63 51 40 1.3 0.5 -0.4 62 41 45 1.0 0.6 NA 49 43 0.6 0.8 28 47 1.1 0.8 52 49 1.0 1.7 49 71 1.3 1.4 61 64 0.8 0.2 38 34 1.0 1.3 47 61 NA University Research Library Support (12) (13)(14) NA .46636 4940 NA .40NA 46 0.3 .64743 53 5841 -0.6 .50NA 43 51! -0.4 .742478 45 6356 0.8 .341968 57 4452 -0.6 .64811 43 5842 NA .503577 5165 .381065 4544 .754283 6371 .41NA 47 .392091 4653 .35756 4441 .33NA 43 .53 53 .60705 5641 .793963 6568 .612611 5657 .00617 2740 .331288 4346 NA 2.0 69 0.9 59 NA -0.5 44 24 41 30 42 88 52 33 43 60 47 130 58 27 42 74 49 126 58 114 56 64 48 114 56 30 42 22 41 NA 36 43 43 44 47 222 74 78 124 57 38 154 62 Published Survey Ratings Articles Standard Error (15) (16) (08) (09) (10) .10 .09 .12 .09 .07 .09 .06 42 43 48 44 47 52 43 47 54 64 51 54 41 42 44 60 39 59 (11) .06 .10 .10 .08 .05 .10 .08 .08 .05 .09 .04 .07 .11 .08 .06 .08 .05 .07 .07 .07 .07 .06 .07 .06 .06 .07 .05 . 08 . 07 .03 .05 .06 .05 .08 .07 .07 .06 .07 .06 .09 .07 .08 .09 .08 .06 .10 .10 .07 .06 .09 .09 .08 . 06 .08 .08 .07 .06 .06 .05 .07 .04 .06 .06 . 08 . 05 .18 .12 .10 .04 .08 . 06 .07 .06 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Since the scale used to compute measure (16) is entirely arbitrary, only values in standardized form are reported for this measure.

OCR for page 42
42 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Characteristics of Prog Proaram Size Program Graduates No. University - Department/Academic Unit (01) (02) (03) (04) (05) (06) (07) 061. Iowa, University of-Iowa City 23 50 63 .19 5.4 .69 .37 Chemistry 50 50 ~ 8 46 5 7 44 53 062. Johns Hopkins University 18 55 50 .31 5.3 .84 .53 Chemistry 45 51 46 57 59 58 64 063. Kansas State University-Manhattan 18 22 50 .33 6.4 .85 .05 Chemistry 45 43 46 59 43 59 30 064. Kansas, University of 20 41 49 .10 5.7 .88 .35 Chemistry 47 48 46 38 53 62 51 065. Kansas, University of 9 14 28 .07 5.5 .93 .07 Pharmaceutical Chemistry 36 42 42 35 55 66 32 066. Kent State University 24 25 35 .15 7.2 .76 .40 Chemistry 51 44 44 43 33 50 55 067. Kentucky, University of 24 14 37 .12 6.0 .81 .38 Chemistry 51 42 44 40 49 55 53 068. Louisiana State University-Baton Rouge 25 41 71 .25 6.0 .63 .21 Chemistry 52 48 49 51 49 37 41 069. Louisville, University of 17 15 27 .35 7.9 .69 .19 Chemistry 44 42 42 61 23 43 40 070. Loyola University of Chicago 17 9 NA .20 8 .3 .90 .40 Chemistry 44 40 47 18 64 55 071. Maryland, University of-College Park 54 96 180 .17 5.7 .74 .16 Chemistry 82 60 67 45 53 49 38 072. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 31 163 175 . 32 4.4 .70 .22 Chemistry 5 8 76 66 5 8 71 45 42 073. Massachusetts, University of-Amherst 23 81 90 .10 5.5 .79 .20 Chemistry 50 57 53 38 55 53 40 074. Miami, University of-Florida 16 17 18 .24 5.4 .43 .14 Chemistry 43 42 41 51 57 18 37 075. Michigan State University-East Lansing 40 142 174 .12 5.4 .78 .32 Chemistry 67 71 66 40 57 52 50 076. Michigan, University of-Ann Arbor 43 82 103 .22 5.5 .76 .38 Chemistry 71 5 7 55 49 55 51 54 077. Minnesota, University of 47 80 153 .26 5.7 .81 .36 Chemistry 75 57 63 52 53 55 52 078. Missouri, University of-Columbia 16 17 13 .22 4.5 .61 .39 Chemistry 43 42 40 49 69 36 54 079. Missouri, University of-Kansas City 16 19 38 .25 7.2 NA NA Chemistry 43 43 44 52 33 080. Missouri, University of-Rolla Chemistry * indicates program was initiated since 1970. 23 11 50 41 18 41 .07 6.3 35 44 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. GINA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. .57 .29 32 47

OCR for page 43
43 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry University Research Published Survey Ratings Prog Survey Results Library Support Articles Standard Error No. (08) (09) (10) (11) (12) (13)(14) (15)(16) (08) (09) (10) (11) 061. 2.5 1.7 0.9 0.8 0.3 .48594 51 .10 .07 .07 .07 49 51 41 49 52 5040 4547 062. 3.1 1.9 0.7 1.1 -0.4 .611138 54 .08 .06 .06 .07 56 56 35 55 45 5645 4647 063. 2.4 1.6 1.3 0.8 NA .61NA 49 .09 .07 .08 .06 49 49 61 50 56 4547 064. 2.6 1.8 0.9 0.8 0.1 .40957 45 .09 .07 .06 .06 50 53 40 47 50 4643 4546 065. 1.9 1.6 NA 0.2 0.1 NA957 42 .27 .22 NA .04 44 50 33 50 43 4444 066. 1.8 1.4 0.9 0.5 -1.8 .25NA 45 .09 .09 .09 .05 43 45 41 40 31 39 4544 067. 1.8 1.3 1.1 0.7 -0.1 .08NA 68 .09 .08 .09 .06 43 43 51 45 49 31 4844 068. 2.8 1.7 1.0 0.9 -0.3 .401161 89 .08 .07 .06 .07 53 52 46 51 46 4645 5254 069. 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.3 NA .29NA 23 .12 .11 .09 .05 38 37 44 37 41 4142 070. 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.5 NA .06NA 16 .12 .10 .07 .06 38 39 41 41 30 4041 071. 2.9 1.9 1.1 1.0 0.2 .521907 66 .08 .06 .08 .06 54 54 51 53 51 5251 4846 072. 4.8 2.8 1.2 1.7 -0.3 .975324 235 .06 .05 .06 .05 73 71 54 71 46 7380 7676 073. 2.6 1.9 1.1 0.9 -0.7 .612621 201 .08 .06 .05 .06 51 55 50 50 42 5657 7054 074. 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.4 NA .19NA 27 .12 .10 .11 .06 3 7 35 45 39 36 4243 075. 3.5 2.1 1.0 1.4 0.3 .501491 109 .07 .05 .06 .06 60 59 45 62 53 5147 5557 076. 3.3 2.1 0.8 1.4 1.8 .561406 150 .08 .05 .07 .06 58 58 40 63 67 5447 6256 077. 3.6 2.1 1.4 1.3 1.2 .512162 159 .06 .04 .06 .05 61 59 68 61 61 5253 6361 078. 1.8 1.1 0.9 0.7 -0.2 .25NA 54 .09 .08 .09 .06 42 40 45 45 47 39 4644 079. 1.6 1.1 1.0 0.4 NA .19NA NA .11 .10 .08 .06 40 40 49 40 36 NA 080. 1.4 1.0 1.0 0.5 NA .26NA 74 .11 .10 .07 .06 39 39 47 42 40 4948 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Since the scale used to compute measure (16) is entirely arbitrary, only values in standardized form are reported for this measure.

OCR for page 48
48 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Characteristics of Prog Program Size Program Graduates No. University - Department/Academic Unit (01) (02) (03) (04) (05) (06) (07) 121. Southern Illinois University-Carbondale 16 23 22 .08 6.1 .88 .63 Chemistry and Biochemistry 43 44 41 36 4 7 61 71 122. Southern Mississippi, Univ of-Hattiesburg 14 17 14 .36 5.3 .86 .50 Chemistry 41 42 40 61 59 60 62 123. Stanford University 18 108 109 .27 5.1 .88 .43 Chemistry . 45 63 56 54 60 61 5 7 124. Syracuse University 18 23 36 .28 6.8 .67 .17 Chemistry 45 44 44 54 39 41 38 125. Temple University 18 17 35 .30 7.3 .68 .26 Chemistry 45 42 44 56 32 42 45 126. Tennessee, University of-Knoxville 28 43 50 .20 5.9 .96 .20 Chemistry 55 48 46 47 50 69 41 127. Texas A & M University 46 107 149 .33 5.4 .66 .31 Chemistry 74 63 62 59 5 7 41 49 128. Texas Tech University-Lubbock 13 28 59 .24 6.3 .76 .62 Chemistry 40 .45 4 7 51 44 50 71 129. Texas, University of-Austin 36 89 230 .30 5.8 .66 .29 Chemistry 63 59 75 56 51 41 47 130. Tulane University 12 11 11 .25 5.8 .67 .25 Chemistry 39 41 40 52 51 41 44 131. Utah State University-Logan 16 22 21 .32 7.3 .68 .26 Chemistry and Biochemistry 43 43 41 58 31 43 45 132. Utah, University of-Salt Lake City 27 57 90 .27 5.8 .75 .39 Chemistry 54 51 53 53 52 49 54 133. Vanderbilt University 19 31 37 .37 5.0 .71 .37 Chemistry 46 45 44 63 62 46 53 134. Vermont, University of 13 24 26 .36 5.4 .95 .67 Chemistry 40 44 42 62 5 7 69 74 135. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State Univ 30 55 93 .22 5.9 .65 .15 Chemistry 5 7 51 53 49 50 40 3 7 136. Virginia, University of 26 36 73 .39 5.2 .71 .43 Chemistry 53 4 7 50 64 60 46 5 7 137. Washington State University-Pullman 29 17 40 .15 5.8 .78 .33 Chemistry 56 42 44 43 52 52 50 138. Washington University-Saint Louis 19 35 52 .38 6.1 .83 .58 Chemistry 46 46 46 63 48 56 68 139. Washington, University of-Seattle 34 74 56 .28 6.2 .66 .30 Chemistry 61 55 4 7 54 46 41 4 8 140. Wayne State University 30 64 52 .16 6.5 .74 .26 Chemistry 57 53 46 43 43 48 45 * indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NAn indicates that the value for a measure is not available.

OCR for page 49
49 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures tRaw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Prog Survey Results No. (08) (09) (10) (11) 121. 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.6 41 40 33 44 122. 0.8 0.6 1.0 0.2 32 30 47 35 123. 4.5 2.6 0.7 1.6 70 68 35 69 124. 2.3 1.6 1.0 0.9 48 49 46 50 125. 1.7 1.1 1.0 0.5 41 40 4 7 41 126. 2.2 1.6 1.1 0.5 47 49 52 41 127. 3.7 2.0 1.4 1.3 61 58 67 61 128. 2.2 1.4 1.3 0.8 46 46 59 49 129. 3.8 2.2 1.4 1.3 63 61 64 61 130. 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.7 40 40 35 46 131. 1.6 1.1 1.1 40 41 52 132. 3.7 2.1 1.6 62 59 73 133. 2.6 1.6 1.0 50 50 49 134. 2.2 1.4 1.1 46 46 51 135. 2.4 1.7 1.2 48 51 57 136. 2.8 1.8 1.4 52 53 67 137. 2.5 1.8 1.2 50 54 57 138. 2.7 1.8 1.1 52 52 52 139. 3.5 2.0 1.0 59 5 7 49 140. 3.0 1.9 1.0 54 54 45 0.3 37 1.4 -0.6 63 43 0.8 -0.7 48 42 0.7 NA 45 0.8 48 0.9 51 0.7 46 0.8 4B 1.2 58 1.1 56 NA -0.0 49 0.7 57 -0.3 46 -0.4 45 1.5 64 -0.4 46 University Research Published Library Support Articles (12) (13) (14) (15)(16) -0.2 .13 NA 30 47 33 4243 NA .29 NA 23 41 4141 2.0 .83 4159 177 70 67 70 6665 ~0~3 .44 691 40 46 4 8 41 4444 -0.4 .22 NA 27 45 3 8 4243 -0.4 45 -0.5 45 NA 1.6 66 -1.0 39 .32 929 43 43 .50 3715 51 66 .54 736 53 41 .58 3373 55 63 .50 NA 51 .44 NA 48 76 50 45 246 78 74 38 43 261 80 37 22 41 .742290 140 6254 60 .42NA 72 47 49 .54NA 38 53 43 .301281 73 4246 49 .46813 98 4942 53 .69785 61 6042 47 .47741 28 5041 42 .44921 98 4843 53 .702022 79 6152 50 44 80 39 41 63 46 44 48 57 45 43 55 52 Survey Ratings Standard Error (08) (09) (10) (11) .10 .09 .07 .06 .08 .10 .13 .06 .05 .07 .07 .08 .07 .11 .09 .07 .05 .05 .06 .06 .09 .09 .06 .07 .04 .07 .06 .10 .08 .08 .07 .07 .05 .06 .06 .08 .08 .09 .07 .13 .12 .09 .05 .07 .05 .06 .06 .09 .08 .06 .07 .09 .11 .09 .08 .07 .08 .08 .06 .09 .08 .08 .06 .07 .06 .08 .05 .07 .07 .08 .06 .06 .06 .08 .07 .06 .05 .08 .07 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second-line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. nNA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Since the scale used to compute measure (16) is entirely arbitrary, only values in standardized form are reported for this measure.

OCR for page 50
50 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry Pro9 No. University - Department/Academic Unit 141. Western Michigan University Chemistry 142. Wisconsin, University of-Madison Chemistry 143. Wisconsin, University of-Milwaukee Chemistry * 144. Wyoming, University of Chemistry Characteristics of Program Size Program Graduates (04) (05) 17 7 12 44 40 40 39 200 66 85 19 44 43 16 18 43 42 226 75 35 44 21 41 NA NA .15 5.6 43 54 ·05 6.0 34 49 .26 5.5 53 55 (06) (07) NA NA .90 .40 64 55 .24 43 .58 .26 33 45 145. Yale University 24 72 118 .25 4.9 .83 .56 Chemistry 51 55 57 52 64 57 66 * indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = `50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available.

OCR for page 51
51 TABLE 3.1 Program Measures (Raw and Standardized Values) in Chemistry University Research Published Survey Ratings Prog Survey Results Library Support Articles Standard Error No. (08) (09) (10) (11) (12) (13)(14) (15)(16) (08) (09) (10) (11) 141. 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.4 NA .00NA 5 .10 .09 .07 .06 34 31 38 39 27 3840 142. 4.4 2.6 1.0 1.7 1.6 .775450 253 .06 .05 .06 .05 69 67 49 70 65 6481 7981 143. 1.9 1.4 1.3 0.6 NA . .53669 NA .11 .09 .07 .06 43 45 61 44 5241 NA 144. 1.4 0.8 0.9 0.6 NA .31MA 17 .11 .09 .10 .06 38 35 42 43 42 4041 145. 3.9 2.4 1.1 1.4 2.1 .792107 98 .06 .05 .08 .06 64 64 52 64 70 6553 5357 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available. Since the scale used to compute measure (16) is entirely arbitrary, only values in standardized form are reported for this measure.

OCR for page 52
52 TABLE 3.2 Summary Statistics Describing Each Program Measure--Chemistry Number of ProgramsStandard D E C I L E S Measure Evaluated Mean Deviation1 2 3456789 Program Size 01 Raw Value 145 23 10 13 16 17 18 21 23 26 29 36 Std Value 145 50 10 40 43 44 45 48 50 53 56 63 02 Raw Value 144 51 43 14 18 23 28 36 46 59 73 108 Std Value 144 50 10 42 42 44 45 47 49 52 55 63 03 Raw Value 144 75 62 17 23 35 47 53 72 87 109 173 Std Value 144 50 10 41 42- 44 46 47 50 52 56 66 Program Graduates 04 Raw Value 140 .23 .11 .09 .14 .16 .20 .22 .25 .28 .33 .37 Std Value 140 50 10 37 42 44 47 49 52 55 59 63 05 Raw Value 140 5.9 .7 6.8 6.4 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.1 Std Value 140 50 10 38 43 46 49 51 54 56 57 61 06 Raw Value 139 .76 .10 .63 .67 .71 .74 .77 .80 .82 .85 .88 Std Value 139 50 10 37 41 45 48 51 54 56 59 62 07 Raw Value 139 .33 .14 .14 .21 .25 .29 .33 .37 .40 .44 .52 Std Value 139 50 10 36 41 44 47 50 53 55 58 64 Survey Results 08 Raw Value 145 2.5 1.0 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.5 2.7 3.1 3.4 3.9 Std Value 145 50 10 38 41 44 46 50 52 56 59 64 09 Raw Value 145 1.6 .5 .9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.3 Std Value 145 50 10 36 40 44 48 49 53 55 57 62 10 Raw Value 143 1.1 .2 .8 .9 .9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 Std Value 143 50 10 38 42 42 47 52 52 57 57 61 11 Raw Value 145 .9 .4 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.1 1.2 1.5 Std Value 145 50 10 39 41 44 46 49 51 56 58 66 University Library 12 Raw Value87 .1 1.0 -1.1 -.6 -.5 -.4 -.2 .1 .4 .9 1.6 Std Value87 50 10 38 43 44 45 47 50 53 58 65 Research Support 13 Raw Value141 .48 .21 .22 .29 .34 .43 .50 .54 .61 .67 .75 Std Value141 50 10 38 41 43 48 51 53 56 59 63 14 Raw Value95 1788 1186 728 813 952 1074 1273 1745 2099 2544 3575 Std Value95 50 10 41 42 43 44 46 50 53 56 65 Publication Records 15 Raw Value 143 78 61 19 29 38 48 61 74 93 120161 Std Value 143 50 10 40 42 43 4S 47 49 52 5764 16 Std Value 143 50 10 41 42 43 44 46 48 54 57 63 NOTE: Standardized values reported in the preceding table have been computed from exact values of the mean and standard deviation and not the rounded values reported here. Since the scale used to compute measure 16 is entirely arbitrary, only data in standardized form are reported for this measure.

OCR for page 53
53 TABLE 3.3 Intercorrelations Among Program Measures on 145 Programs in Chemistry Measur e 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Program Size 01 -68 .75 -.11 .24.11 .14 .64 .62 .35 .63 .39 .31 .43.68 .65 02 .92 .02 .38.23 .13 .83 .81 .23 .83 .61 .57 .72.83 .86 0 3 .01 .32.24 .15 .81 .79 .35 .80 .61 .51 .66.81 .84 Program Graduates 04 .00-.07 .05 .11 .08 .01 .07 .10 .20 .18-.03 .03 05 .17 .26 .47 .46 .23 .46 .19 .39 .35.38 .41 06 .32 .28 .30 .10 .25 .28 .20 .31.21 .22 07 .30 .27 .16 .32 .20 .23 .20.15 .23 Survey Results 0 8 .98 .35 .96 .66 .77 .79.80 .86 09 .36 .92 .65 .77 .74.78 .82 10 .31 .03 .32 .14.33 .33 11 .62 .74 .77.81 .88 University Library 12 .37 .45.46 .56 Research Suppor t 13 .55.52 .60 14 .70 .78 Publication Records 15 .95 16 NOTE: Since in computing correlation coefficients program data must be available for both of the measures being correlated, the actual number of programs on which each coefficient is based varies.

OCR for page 54
54 s.o++ 4. 0++ Measure + 3.0++ 0 8 + + + + 2 . 0++ 1.0++ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * :** * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * ** * * - * * * * * ** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * r - .67 * O.O +/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/+++++++++++++/ 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 Measure 01 (square root scale) FIGURE 3.1 Mean rating of scholarly quality of faculty (measure 08) versus number of faculty members (measure 01)--145 programs in chemi~try.

OCR for page 55
5s 3 . 0~+ + 2 . 0++ + Measure+ 09+ + 1 . 0++ + + + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * ** * t** * * **** * * * * ** *** * * ~ * * * ** * *** *** * ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * ** ** ** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * r ~ .88 * * O·O +/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/+++++/ 1 4 9 16 2S 36 49 64 81 100 121 144 169 196 225 256 Measure 02 (square root scale) FIGURE 3.2 Mean rating of program effectiveness in educating research scholars/scientists (measure 09) versus number of graduates in last f ive years (measure 02)--144 programs in chemistry.

OCR for page 56
56 TABLE 3.4 Characteristics of Survey Participants in Chemistry Respondents N% Field of specialization Analytical Chemistry3913 Biochemistry103 Inorganic Chemistry4615 Organic Chemistry10134 Physical Chemistry6722 Theoretical Chemistry186 Other/Unknown2 07 Faculty Rank P rofessor18863 Associate Professor7 72 6 Assistant Professor3512 Other/Unknown10 Year of Highest Degree Pre-19503110 1950-597023 1960-6912140 Post-19697324 Unknown62 Evaluator Selection Nominated by Institution26688 Other3512 Survey Form With Faculty Names27190 Without Names3010 Total Evaluators301100

OCR for page 57
57 Mean Survey Rat ing (Measure 08 ) FIGURE 3.3 Mean rating of scholarly quality of faculty in 145 programs in chemistry. _ . . NOTE: Programs are listed in sequence of mean rating, with the highest-rated program appear ing at the top of the page. The broken lines (---) indicate a confidence interval of +1.5 standard errors around the reported mean (x) of each program.

OCR for page 58

Representative terms from entire chapter:

raw value