Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 79
Adding Value to the Facility Acquisition Process: BEST PRACTICES FOR REVIEWING FACILITY DESIGNS E Bibliography AGC (Associated General Contractors of America). 1993. Presentation Material for the Associated General Contractors of America 's Conference on Project Delivery Systems for Building Construction held in Atlanta, GA, on September 9-10, 1993. AGC. 1995. Partnering and Changing Attitudes in Construction. Washington, DC: AGC. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 1990. Quality in the Constructed Project: A Guide for Owners, Designers and Constructors. Vol. 1, Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, No. 73. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers. Bell, Glenn R, Frank W. Kan and David R. Wright. 1998. Project Peer Review: Results of the Structural Failures II Conference . Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 3(4): pp. 218-225 . Bender, Richard and Todd Bressi. 1989. Design Review: A Review of Processes, Procedures and Potential. Center for Environmental Design Research. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Brown, J. Carter, ed. 1995. Federal Buildings in Context: The Role of Design Review. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. Cable, John H., and Gerald W. Westerbeck. 1998. Assessment of ISO 9000 Pilot Program. US Army Corps of Engineers. Publication CE607R1. McLean, VA: Logistics Management Institute. CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1986a.Constructability: A Primer. Publication 3-1. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. CII. 1986b. Evaluation of Design Effectiveness. Report RS8-1. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. CII. 1989a. Costs of Quality Deviations in Design & Construction. Publication 10-1. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. CII. 1989b. Measuring the Cost of Quality in Design & Construction. Publication 10-2. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. CII. 1989c. Analysis of Pre Project Planning. Publication SD-105. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. CII. 1997. Owner/Contractor Work Structure Process Handbook. Report IR111-2. Austin, Texas: University of Texas at Austin. CII. 1998. Benchmarking and Metrics Summary for 1997. Benchmarking and Metrics Committee. Austin, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin. DBIA (Design Build Institute of America). 1999. National Government/Industry Forum On Design-Build Plus. Summary of a workshop held September 9, 1998. Washington DC: Dyer, Sue. 1997. Partner Your Project. Livermore, CA: Pendulum Publishing. East, E. William, Tim Roessler and Mark Lustig. 1995. Improving the Design Review Process: The Reviewer's Assistant. Journal of Computing In Civil Engineering. Washington, DC: American Society of Civil Engineers. East, E. William. 1998. Web-Enabled Design Review and Lessons Learned. USACERL Technical Report 98/31. Champaign, IL: US Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratories . FCC (Federal Construction Council). 1987. Quality Control On Federal Construction Projects. Technical Report No. 84. Consulting Committee on Contract Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. FCC. 1990. Quality Planning in Times of Tight Budgets: Summary of a Symposium . Technical Report No. 97, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. FFC (Federal Facilities Council). 1998. Government/Industry Forum on Capital Facilities and Core Competencies . Technical Report No. 136. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Godfrey, Kneeland A. 1995. Partnering in Design and Construction. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
OCR for page 80
Adding Value to the Facility Acquisition Process: BEST PRACTICES FOR REVIEWING FACILITY DESIGNS Kirby, Jeffrey G., Douglas A. Furry and Donald A. Hicks. 1988. Improvements in Design Review Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 114(1): 69-72. Mendelsohn, Roy. 1997. The Constructability Review Process: A Contractor's Perspective. Journal of Management in Engineering. 13(3): 17-19. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1999. Partnering Desk Reference Guide. Washington, DC: NASA. NASA. 1993. NASA Facility Project Implementation Handbook. Washington, DC: NASA. NASA. 1986. Facility Engineering Guide. Washington, DC:NASA. NRC (National Research Council). 1989. Improving the Design Quality of Federal Buildings. Committee on Improving the Design Quality of Federal Buildings, Building Research Board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC. 1990. Achieving Designs to Budget for Federal Facilities, Committee on Design to Budget for Federal Facilities. Building Research Board. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC. 1994. On the Responsibilities of Architects and Engineers and Their Clients in Federal Facilities Development. Committee on Architect-Engineer Responsibilities, Building Research Board, Washington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC. 1998. Stewardship of Federal Facilities: A Proactive Strategy for Managing the Nation's Public Assets. Committee to Assess Techniques for Developing Maintenance and Repair Budgets for Federal Facilities. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Nigro, William T., and Martha W. Nigro. 1992. Redicheck Interdisciplinary Coordination. 3rd edition. Peachtree City, GA:. The REDICHECK Firm. Schuster, J. Mark. 1990. Design Review: The View from the Architecture Profession. Design and Development Group. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Stephenson, Ralph J. 1996. Project Partnering for the Design and Construction Industry. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. TBR (The Business Roundtable). 1997. The Business Stake in Effective Project Systems. Washington, DC: The Business Roundtable. Zallen, Rubin M., 1996. Proposal for Structural Design Peer Review. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers. 4(4): 208-215.
Representative terms from entire chapter: