Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 213
APPENDI X C LETTER TO EVALUATORS COMMITTEE ON AN ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY-RELATED CHARACTERISTICS OF RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATES Established by the co?'ferc'Ice Board of Associated Research Councils Office of the Staff Director / National Research Council / 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. / ' April 14, 1981 Dear Washington, D.C. 20418 As you may already know, our committee has undertaken an assessment of research-doctorate programs in U.S. universities. The study is exam- ining approximately 2,650 programs in 31 fields in the arts and humanities, biological sciences, engineering, physical and mathematical sciences, and social sciences. A study prospectus is provided on the reverse of this page. You have been selected from a faculty list furnished by your institu- tion to evaluate programs offering research-doctorates in the field of Biochemistry. On the first page of the attached form is a list of the 139 programs that are being evaluated in this field. These programs produce more than 90 percent of the doctorate recipients in the field. In order to keep the task manageable, you are being asked to consider a randomly selected subset of 50 of these programs. These are designated with an asterisk in the list on the next page and are presented in random sequence on the evaluation sheets that follow. Please read the accompanying instructions carefully before attempting your evaluations. We ask that you complete the attached survey form and return it in the enclosed envelope within the next three weeks. The evaluations you and your colleagues render will constitute an important component of this study. Your prompt attention to this request will be very much appreciated by our committee. Sincerely, ' W~ ~~ Lyle Jones For the Study Committee Enclosures COMMITTEE MEMBERS Marcus Alexis Winfred P. Lehmann Kumar Patel Robert M. Bock Saunders Mac Lane Michael J. Pelczar, Jr. Lyle V. Jones, Co-Chairman Philip E. Converse Nancy S. Milburn Jerome B. Schneewind Gardner Lindzey, Co-Chairman James H. M. Henderson Lincoln E. Moses Duane C. Spriestersbach Paul A. Albrecht Ernest S. Kuh James C. Olson Harriet A. Zuckerman 213
OCR for page 214
214 RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF BIOCHEMISTRY (* DESIGNATES THE PROGRAMS WHICH YOU ARE ASKED TO EVALUATE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES.) INSTITUTION - DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT UNIV OF ALABAMA SCH OF MED, BIRMINGHAM - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, TUCSON - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIV OF ARKANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, LITTLE ROCK - BIOCHEMISTRY AUBURN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY/ANIMAL AND DAIRY SCIENCES BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, HOUSTON - BIOCHEMISTRY BOSTON UNIVERSITY - MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES BOSTON UNIVERSITY - INTERDEPARTMENTAL BIOCHEMI STRY PROGRAM BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY BROWN UNIVERSITY - BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE BRYN MAWR COLLEGE - BIOLOGY/CHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF CASE WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF UNIVERSITY OF CUNY, THE _ CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY - BIOCHEMISTRY CALIFORNIA, DAVIS - BIOCHEMISTRY CALIFORNIA, IRVINE - MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY/ BIOLOGICAL CHEM CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES - CHEMISTRY/BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE - BIOCHEMISTRY CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO - BIOLOGY CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO - CHEMISTRY CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO - BIOCHEMISTRY CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY RESERVE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY CHICAGO - BIOCHEMISTRY CINCINNATI - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY GRADUATE SCHOOL - BIOCHEMISTRY COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, FT COLLINS - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER - BIOCHEMISTRY/BIOPHYSICS/GENETICS COLUMBIA UNIV-GRAD SCHOOL OF ARTS 8 SCI - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, STORRS - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA - BIOCHEMISTRY, MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY CORNELL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, NYC - BIOCHEMISTRY DARTMOUTH COLLEGE - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE, NEWARK - CHEMISTRY DUKE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY EMORY UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA, ATHENS - BIOCHEMISTRY HARVARD UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY (GRADUATE SCHOOL) HARVARD UNIVERSITY - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY (MEDICAL SCH) UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS UNIV OF HEALTH SCI/CHICAGO MEDICAL SCHOOL - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - BIOPHYSICAL SCIENCES HOWARD UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - BIOLOGY UNIV OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIV OF ILLINOIS AT THE MED CTR, CHICAGO - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS - BIOCHEMISTRY IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, AMES - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, IOWA CITY - BIOCHEMISTRY JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, MANHATTAN - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS - BIOCHEMISTRY (GRADUATE SCHOOL) UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS - BIOCHEMISTRY (SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT KANSAS CITY) UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - BIOCHEMISTRY LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, BATON ROUGE - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE - BIOCHEMISTRY LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK - CHEMISTRY UNIV OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE PROF SCHOOLS - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - BIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST - BIOCHEMISTRY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CHARLESTON - BIOCHEMISTRY COL OF MED 8 DENT OF NEW JERSEY (NEWARK) - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI (FLORIDA) - BIOCHEMISTRY MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST LANSING - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - BIOCHEMISTRY (GRADUATE SCHOOL AND MEDICAL SCHOOL) UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, COLUMBIA - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, LINCOLN - CHEMISTRY/SCHOOL OF LIFE SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE - BIOCHEMISTRY NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY, ALAMAGORDO - CHEMISTRY NEW YORK UNIVERSITY - BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL - BIOCHEMISTRY AND NUTRITION * *
OCR for page 215
215 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, RALEIGH - BIOCHEMISTRY NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, FARGO - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA, GRAND FORKS - BIOCHEMISTRY NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, DE KALB - CHEMISTRY NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY/ BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - CHEMISTRY OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - PHYSIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY, STILLWATER - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, EUGENE - BIOLOGY/CHEMISTRY OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, COVALLIS - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY (MEDICAL CTR) PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY (GRADUATE SCHOOL) UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - BIOCHEMISTRY (SCHOOL OF MEDICINE) UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ARTS AND SCIENCES) PRINCETON UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES PURDUE UNIVERSITY, WEST LAFAYETTE - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND - BIOCHEMISTRY/BIOPHYSICS RICE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER - BIOCHEMISTRY ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, NEW BRUNSWICK - BIOCHEMISTRY SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA, VERMILLION - BIOCHEMISTRY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND PHARMACOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - BIOCHEMISTRY SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, CARBONDALE - CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY STANFORD UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, GAINESVILLE - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY SUNY AT ALBANY - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SUNY AT BUFFALO - BIOCHEMISTRY (SCHOOL OF MEDICINE) SUNY AT BUFFALO - BIOCHEMISTRY (ROSWELL PARK GRADUATE DIVISION) SUNY AT STONY BROOK - BIOCHEMISTRY SUNY, DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER (BROOKLYN) - BIOCHEMISTRY SUNY, UPSTATE MEDICAL CENTER (SYRACUSE) - BIOCHEMISTRY SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY - BIOLOGY SUNY, COL OF ENVIR SCI & FORESTRY (SYRACUSE) - SCHOOL OF BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY, AND ECOLOGY TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIV OF TENNESSEE-CTR FOR HEALTH SCI, MEMPHIS - BIOCHEMISTRY TEXAS A&M-UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN - CHEMISTRY UNIV OF TEXAS, UNIV OF TEXAS, HLTH SC UNIV OF TEXAS, HLTH SC THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY TULANE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, SALT LAKE CITY - BIOCHEMISTRY VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT - BIOCHEMISTRY VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIV - BIOCHEMISTRY AND NUTRITION UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - BIOCHEMISTRY WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, PULLMAN - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEbTTLE - BIOCHEMISTRY WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY - MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY - AGRICULTURAL BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MADISON - PHYSIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MADISON.- BIOCHEMISTRY UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING - BIOCHEMISTRY YALE UNIVERSITY - MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS AND BIOCHEM/ PHARMACOLOGY/ BIOLOGY ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - BIOCHEMISTRY * * MFn RQ4NCH AT GALVESTON - HUMAN BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND GENETICS HI CTR AT HOUSTON - BIOCHEM ~ MOLECULAR BIO(MED SCM)/ BIOCHEM(ANDERSON HOSP) PI CTR AT SAN ANTONIO - BIOCHEMISTRY
OCR for page 216
216 INSTRUCTIONS At the top of the next page please provide the information requested on the highest degree you hold and your current field of specialization. You may be assured that all information you furnish on the survey form is to be used for purposes of statistical Description only and that the confidentiality of your responses will be protected. On the pages that follow you are asked to judge 50 programs (presented in random sequence) that offer the research-doctorate. Each program is to be evaluated in terms of: (I) scholarly quality of program faculty; (2) effectiveness of program in educating research scholars/scientists; and (3) change in program quality in the last five years (see below). Although the assessment is limited to these factors, our committee recognizes that other factors are relevant to the quality of doctoral programs, and that graduate programs serve important purposes in addition to that of educating doctoral candidates. ~ list of the faculty members signficantly involved in each program, the name of the academic unit in which the program is offered, and the number of doctorates awarded in that program during the last five years have been printed on the survey form (whenever available). Although this information has been furnished to us by the institution and is believed to be accurate, it has not been verified by our study committee and may have a few omissions, misspellings, or other errors. Before marking your responses on the survey form, you may find it helpful to look over the full set of programs you are being asked to evaluate. In making your Judgments about each program, please keep in mind the following instructions: (I) Scholarly Oualitv of Program Facul-tv. Check the box next to the term that most closely corresponds to your judgment of the quality of faculty in the research-ooctorate program described. Consider only the scholarly competence and achievements of the faculty It is suggested that no more than five programs be designated "distinguished." (2) Effectiveness of Program in Educating Research Scholars/Scientists. Check the box next to the term that most closely corresponds to your judgment of the doctoral program's effectiveness in educating research scholars/scientists. Consider the access- ibility of the faculty, the curricula, the instructional and research facilities, the quality of graduate students, the performance of the graduates, and other factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the research-doctorate program. (3) Change in Program Oualitv in Last Five Years. Check the box next to the term that most closely corresponds to your esti- mate of the change that has taken place in the research- doctorate program in the last five years. Consider both the scholarly quality of the program faculty and the effectiveness of the program in educating research scholars/scientists. Com- pare the quality of the program today with its quality five years ago--not the change in the programs relative standing among other programs in the field. In assessing each of these factors, mark the category "Don't know well enough to evaluate" if you are unfamiliar with that aspect of the program. It is quite possible that for some programs you may be knowledgeable about the scholarly quality of the faculty, but not about the effectiveness of the program or change in program quality. For each of the programs identified, you are also asked to indicate the extent to which you are familiar with the work of members of the program faculty. For example, if you recognize only a very small fraction of the faculty, you should mark the category "Little or no familiarity." Please be certain that you have provided a set of responses for each of the programs identified on the following pages. The fully completed survey form should be returned in the enclosed envelope to: Committee on an Assessment of Quality-Related Characteristics of Research-Doctorate Programs National Research Council, JH-638 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418 Our committee will be most appreciative of your thoughtful assessment of these research- doctorate programs. We welcome any comments you may wish to append to the completed survey form.
OCR for page 217
217 PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: HIGHEST DEGREE YOU HOLD: ( ) PH.D. ( ) OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY): YEAR OF HIGHEST DECREE: INSTITUTION OF HIGHEST DEGREE: YOUR CURRENT FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION (CHECK ONLY ONE): A. ~ ) ANATOMY B. ( ) ANIMAL SCIENCES .. ( ) G. ( ) H. ( ) I. ( ) U- ( ) K. ( ) L. ( ) BIOCHEMISTRY BIOPHYSICS BOTANY CELL BIOLOGY ECOLOGY ENTOMOLOGY GENERAL BIOLOGY GENETICS IMMUNOLOGY MICROBIOLOGY/BACTERIOLOGY INSTITUTION: DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 12 PROFESSORS: James H. FREISHEIM, Richard JACKSON, Jerry B. LINGREL, Harry RUDNEY ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Richard W. ARMENTROUT, W. David BEHNKE, Eric I. GRUENSTEIN, Judith A. K. HARMONY ! Robert C. KRUEGER, dames D. OGLE, Amadeo J. PESCE ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Kenneth M. BLUMENTHAL, Ronald D. BROWN, Donal LUSE, Bruce MOULTON FORM NO. 2203-51 M. ( ) MOLECULAR BIOLOGY N. ( ) NUTRITION/FOOD SCIENCE O. ( ) PATHOLOGY P. ( ) PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY 0. ( ) PHYSIOLOGY, ANIMAL/HUMAN R. ( ) PHYSIOLOGY, PLANT S. ( ) PHYTOPATHOLOGY T. ( ) PUBLIC HEALTH/EPIDEMIOLOGY I ZOOLOGY I OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY): U. ( ) V. ( ) UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FORM NO. 2203-01 BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS I. ( ) DISTINGUISHED 2. ( ) STRONG l. ( ) EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE 3. ( ) GOOD 2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE 4. ( ) ADEQUATE 3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE 5. ( ) MARGINAL 4. ( ) NOT EFFECTIVE 6. ( ) NOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION ' O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH' TO EVALUATE CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY 1. ( ) BETTER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO I. ( ) CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY 2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST fIVE YEAR 2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY 3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO 3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
OCR for page 218
218 INSTITUTION: MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST LANSING FORM NO. 2203-02 DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: BIOCHEMISTRY TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 34 PROFESSORS: Richard ANDERSON, Charles ARNTZEN, Steven AUST, Loran BIEBER, William DEAL, James FAIRLEY, Philip FILNER, Paul KINDEL, Hans LILLEVIK, Richard LUECKE, Veronica MAHER, David MCCONNELL, Justin MCCORMICK, Allan MORRIS, Fritz ROTTMAN, John SPECK, Clarence SWELTER, Charles SWEELEY, N. E. TOLBERT, Jack WATSON, William WELLS, John WILSON, Willis WOOD ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Deborah DELMER, Pamela FRAKER, William SMITH ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Jerry DODGSON, Edward FRITSCH, Roger KOBES, Hsing Jien KUNG, Shelagh Ferguson MILLER, Arnold REVZIN, Melvin SCHINDLER, Karel SCHUBERT, John WANG OTHER STAFF : Susan HAWKES, John HOLLAND SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY I. ( ) DISTINGUISHED 2. ( ) STRONG 3. ( ) GOOD 4. ( ) ADEQUATE S. ( ) MARvINAL 6. ( ) NOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE FAMI LIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY l. ( ) CONSIDERABlE FAMILIARITY 2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY 3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS 1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE 2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE 3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE 4. ( ) N07 EFFECTIVE O. ( ) DON' r KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS 1. ( ) BETTER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO 2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST fIVE YEAR 3. ( ) POORER THAN fIVE YEARS AGO l O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE INSTITUTION: UNIV OF ILLINOIS AT THE NED CTR, CHICAGO FORM NO. 2203-03 DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 25 PROFESSORS: Michael BARANY, Clyde C. DOUGHTY, Henry GEWURZ, Mary Sue HANLON, Thomas O. HENDERSON, Henry JEFFAY, Janos MOLNAR, Terrell C. MYERS, Mariano TAO, Edward B. TITCHENER, dames VARY, Bernard WEISSMAN ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Charalampos ARSENIS, Bernard FRIEDENSON, Paul MORRIS, Tarakad RAJKUMAR, Newton RESSLER ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Robert V. STORTI SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY ~ . ( ) DI so I NGU I SHED 2. ( ) STRONG 3. ( ) GOOD 4. ( ) ADEQUATE 5. ( ) MARGINAL 6. ( ) NOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY 1. ( ) CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY 2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY 3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN E LOCATING RESEARCH SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS 1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFfECTIVE 2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE 3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE 4. ( ) N07 EFFECTIVE O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH 70 EVALUATE CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS 1. ( ) BETTER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO 2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST FIVE YEAR 3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
Representative terms from entire chapter: