Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 213
APPENDI X C
LETTER TO EVALUATORS
COMMITTEE ON AN ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY-RELATED CHARACTERISTICS
OF RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATES
Established by the co?'ferc'Ice Board of Associated Research Councils
Office of the Staff Director / National Research Council / 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. / '
April 14, 1981
Dear
Washington, D.C. 20418
As you may already know, our committee has undertaken an assessment
of research-doctorate programs in U.S. universities. The study is exam-
ining approximately 2,650 programs in 31 fields in the arts and humanities,
biological sciences, engineering, physical and mathematical sciences, and
social sciences. A study prospectus is provided on the reverse of this
page. You have been selected from a faculty list furnished by your institu-
tion to evaluate programs offering research-doctorates in the field of
Biochemistry.
On the first page of the attached form is a list of the 139 programs
that are being evaluated in this field. These programs produce more than 90
percent of the doctorate recipients in the field. In order to keep the task
manageable, you are being asked to consider a randomly selected subset of
50 of these programs. These are designated with an asterisk in the list on
the next page and are presented in random sequence on the evaluation sheets
that follow. Please read the accompanying instructions carefully before
attempting your evaluations.
We ask that you complete the attached survey form and return it in the
enclosed envelope within the next three weeks. The evaluations you and
your colleagues render will constitute an important component of this study.
Your prompt attention to this request will be very much appreciated by our
committee.
Sincerely, '
W~ ~~
Lyle Jones
For the Study Committee
Enclosures
COMMITTEE MEMBERS Marcus Alexis Winfred P. Lehmann Kumar Patel
Robert M. Bock Saunders Mac Lane Michael J. Pelczar, Jr.
Lyle V. Jones, Co-Chairman Philip E. Converse Nancy S. Milburn Jerome B. Schneewind
Gardner Lindzey, Co-Chairman James H. M. Henderson Lincoln E. Moses Duane C. Spriestersbach
Paul A. Albrecht Ernest S. Kuh James C. Olson Harriet A. Zuckerman
213
OCR for page 214
214
RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF BIOCHEMISTRY
(* DESIGNATES THE PROGRAMS WHICH YOU ARE ASKED TO EVALUATE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES.)
INSTITUTION - DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT
UNIV OF ALABAMA SCH OF MED, BIRMINGHAM - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, TUCSON - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIV OF ARKANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, LITTLE ROCK - BIOCHEMISTRY
AUBURN UNIVERSITY - CHEMISTRY/ANIMAL AND DAIRY SCIENCES
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, HOUSTON - BIOCHEMISTRY
BOSTON UNIVERSITY - MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES
BOSTON UNIVERSITY - INTERDEPARTMENTAL BIOCHEMI STRY PROGRAM
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
BROWN UNIVERSITY - BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE - BIOLOGY/CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
CASE WESTERN
UNIVERSITY OF
UNIVERSITY OF
CUNY, THE _
CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY - BIOCHEMISTRY
CALIFORNIA, DAVIS - BIOCHEMISTRY
CALIFORNIA, IRVINE - MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY/ BIOLOGICAL CHEM
CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES - CHEMISTRY/BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE - BIOCHEMISTRY
CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO - BIOLOGY
CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO - CHEMISTRY
CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO - BIOCHEMISTRY
CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
RESERVE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
CHICAGO - BIOCHEMISTRY
CINCINNATI - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
GRADUATE SCHOOL - BIOCHEMISTRY
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, FT COLLINS - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER - BIOCHEMISTRY/BIOPHYSICS/GENETICS
COLUMBIA UNIV-GRAD SCHOOL OF ARTS 8 SCI - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, STORRS - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA - BIOCHEMISTRY, MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY
CORNELL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, NYC - BIOCHEMISTRY
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE, NEWARK - CHEMISTRY
DUKE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
EMORY UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA, ATHENS - BIOCHEMISTRY
HARVARD UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY (GRADUATE SCHOOL)
HARVARD UNIVERSITY - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY (MEDICAL SCH)
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
UNIV OF HEALTH SCI/CHICAGO MEDICAL SCHOOL - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - BIOPHYSICAL SCIENCES
HOWARD UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - BIOLOGY
UNIV OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIV OF ILLINOIS AT THE MED CTR, CHICAGO - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS - BIOCHEMISTRY
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, AMES - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, IOWA CITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, MANHATTAN - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS - BIOCHEMISTRY (GRADUATE SCHOOL)
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS - BIOCHEMISTRY (SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT KANSAS CITY)
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - BIOCHEMISTRY
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, BATON ROUGE - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE - BIOCHEMISTRY
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK - CHEMISTRY
UNIV OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE PROF SCHOOLS - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - BIOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST - BIOCHEMISTRY
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, CHARLESTON - BIOCHEMISTRY
COL OF MED 8 DENT OF NEW JERSEY (NEWARK) - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI (FLORIDA) - BIOCHEMISTRY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST LANSING - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - BIOCHEMISTRY (GRADUATE SCHOOL AND MEDICAL SCHOOL)
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, COLUMBIA - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, LINCOLN - CHEMISTRY/SCHOOL OF LIFE SCIENCES
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE - BIOCHEMISTRY
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY, ALAMAGORDO - CHEMISTRY
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY - BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL - BIOCHEMISTRY AND NUTRITION
*
*
OCR for page 215
215
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, RALEIGH - BIOCHEMISTRY
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, FARGO - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA, GRAND FORKS - BIOCHEMISTRY
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, DE KALB - CHEMISTRY
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY/ BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - CHEMISTRY
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - PHYSIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY, STILLWATER - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, EUGENE - BIOLOGY/CHEMISTRY
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY, COVALLIS - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY (MEDICAL CTR)
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY (GRADUATE SCHOOL)
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - BIOCHEMISTRY (SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (ARTS AND SCIENCES)
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES
PURDUE UNIVERSITY, WEST LAFAYETTE - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND - BIOCHEMISTRY/BIOPHYSICS
RICE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER - BIOCHEMISTRY
ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, NEW BRUNSWICK - BIOCHEMISTRY
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA, VERMILLION - BIOCHEMISTRY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND PHARMACOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - BIOCHEMISTRY
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, CARBONDALE - CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
STANFORD UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, GAINESVILLE - BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
SUNY AT ALBANY - BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
SUNY AT BUFFALO - BIOCHEMISTRY (SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)
SUNY AT BUFFALO - BIOCHEMISTRY (ROSWELL PARK GRADUATE DIVISION)
SUNY AT STONY BROOK - BIOCHEMISTRY
SUNY, DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER (BROOKLYN) - BIOCHEMISTRY
SUNY, UPSTATE MEDICAL CENTER (SYRACUSE) - BIOCHEMISTRY
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY - BIOLOGY
SUNY, COL OF ENVIR SCI & FORESTRY (SYRACUSE) - SCHOOL OF BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY, AND ECOLOGY
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIV OF TENNESSEE-CTR FOR HEALTH SCI, MEMPHIS - BIOCHEMISTRY
TEXAS A&M-UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN - CHEMISTRY
UNIV OF TEXAS,
UNIV OF TEXAS, HLTH SC
UNIV OF TEXAS, HLTH SC
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
TULANE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, SALT LAKE CITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT - BIOCHEMISTRY
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIV - BIOCHEMISTRY AND NUTRITION
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - BIOCHEMISTRY
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, PULLMAN - BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEbTTLE - BIOCHEMISTRY
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY - BIOCHEMISTRY
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY - MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY - AGRICULTURAL BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MADISON - PHYSIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MADISON.- BIOCHEMISTRY
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING - BIOCHEMISTRY
YALE UNIVERSITY - MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS AND BIOCHEM/ PHARMACOLOGY/ BIOLOGY
ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE - BIOCHEMISTRY
*
*
MFn RQ4NCH AT GALVESTON - HUMAN BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND GENETICS
HI CTR AT HOUSTON - BIOCHEM ~ MOLECULAR BIO(MED SCM)/ BIOCHEM(ANDERSON HOSP)
PI CTR AT SAN ANTONIO - BIOCHEMISTRY
OCR for page 216
216
INSTRUCTIONS
At the top of the next page please provide the information requested on the
highest degree you hold and your current field of specialization. You may be assured
that all information you furnish on the survey form is to be used for purposes of
statistical Description only and that the confidentiality of your responses will be
protected.
On the pages that follow you are asked to judge 50 programs (presented in
random sequence) that offer the research-doctorate. Each program is to be evaluated
in terms of: (I) scholarly quality of program faculty; (2) effectiveness of program
in educating research scholars/scientists; and (3) change in program quality in the
last five years (see below). Although the assessment is limited to these factors,
our committee recognizes that other factors are relevant to the quality of doctoral
programs, and that graduate programs serve important purposes in addition to that
of educating doctoral candidates.
~ list of the faculty members signficantly involved in each program, the name
of the academic unit in which the program is offered, and the number of doctorates
awarded in that program during the last five years have been printed on the survey
form (whenever available). Although this information has been furnished to us
by the institution and is believed to be accurate, it has not been verified by our
study committee and may have a few omissions, misspellings, or other errors.
Before marking your responses on the survey form, you may find it helpful to
look over the full set of programs you are being asked to evaluate. In making your
Judgments about each program, please keep in mind the following instructions:
(I) Scholarly Oualitv of Program Facul-tv. Check the box next to
the term that most closely corresponds to your judgment of the
quality of faculty in the research-ooctorate program described.
Consider only the scholarly competence and achievements of the
faculty It is suggested that no more than five programs be
designated "distinguished."
(2) Effectiveness of Program in Educating Research Scholars/Scientists.
Check the box next to the term that most closely corresponds
to your judgment of the doctoral program's effectiveness in
educating research scholars/scientists. Consider the access-
ibility of the faculty, the curricula, the instructional and
research facilities, the quality of graduate students, the
performance of the graduates, and other factors that contribute
to the effectiveness of the research-doctorate program.
(3)
Change in Program Oualitv in Last Five Years. Check the box
next to the term that most closely corresponds to your esti-
mate of the change that has taken place in the research-
doctorate program in the last five years. Consider both the
scholarly quality of the program faculty and the effectiveness
of the program in educating research scholars/scientists. Com-
pare the quality of the program today with its quality five years
ago--not the change in the programs relative standing among
other programs in the field.
In assessing each of these factors, mark the category "Don't know well enough
to evaluate" if you are unfamiliar with that aspect of the program. It is quite
possible that for some programs you may be knowledgeable about the scholarly quality
of the faculty, but not about the effectiveness of the program or change in program
quality.
For each of the programs identified, you are also asked to indicate the extent
to which you are familiar with the work of members of the program faculty. For example,
if you recognize only a very small fraction of the faculty, you should mark the
category "Little or no familiarity."
Please be certain that you have provided a set of responses for each of the
programs identified on the following pages. The fully completed survey form should
be returned in the enclosed envelope to:
Committee on an Assessment of Quality-Related
Characteristics of Research-Doctorate Programs
National Research Council, JH-638
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20418
Our committee will be most appreciative of your thoughtful assessment of these research-
doctorate programs. We welcome any comments you may wish to append to the completed
survey form.
OCR for page 217
217
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
HIGHEST DEGREE YOU HOLD: ( ) PH.D. ( ) OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):
YEAR OF HIGHEST DECREE:
INSTITUTION OF HIGHEST DEGREE:
YOUR CURRENT FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION (CHECK ONLY ONE):
A. ~ ) ANATOMY
B. ( ) ANIMAL SCIENCES
.. ( )
G. ( )
H. ( )
I. ( )
U- ( )
K. ( )
L. ( )
BIOCHEMISTRY
BIOPHYSICS
BOTANY
CELL BIOLOGY
ECOLOGY
ENTOMOLOGY
GENERAL BIOLOGY
GENETICS
IMMUNOLOGY
MICROBIOLOGY/BACTERIOLOGY
INSTITUTION:
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT:
TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 12
PROFESSORS: James H. FREISHEIM, Richard JACKSON, Jerry B. LINGREL, Harry RUDNEY
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Richard W. ARMENTROUT, W. David BEHNKE, Eric I. GRUENSTEIN,
Judith A. K. HARMONY ! Robert C. KRUEGER, dames D. OGLE, Amadeo J. PESCE
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Kenneth M. BLUMENTHAL, Ronald D. BROWN, Donal LUSE, Bruce MOULTON
FORM NO. 2203-51
M. ( ) MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
N. ( ) NUTRITION/FOOD SCIENCE
O. ( ) PATHOLOGY
P. ( ) PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY
0. ( ) PHYSIOLOGY, ANIMAL/HUMAN
R. ( ) PHYSIOLOGY, PLANT
S. ( ) PHYTOPATHOLOGY
T. ( ) PUBLIC HEALTH/EPIDEMIOLOGY
I ZOOLOGY
I OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):
U. ( )
V. ( )
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FORM NO. 2203-01
BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
I. ( ) DISTINGUISHED
2. ( ) STRONG l. ( ) EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE
3. ( ) GOOD 2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE
4. ( ) ADEQUATE 3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
5. ( ) MARGINAL 4. ( ) NOT EFFECTIVE
6. ( ) NOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION
' O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH' TO EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) BETTER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
I. ( ) CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY 2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST fIVE YEAR
2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY 3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
OCR for page 218
218
INSTITUTION: MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST LANSING FORM NO. 2203-02
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: BIOCHEMISTRY
TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 34
PROFESSORS: Richard ANDERSON, Charles ARNTZEN, Steven AUST, Loran BIEBER, William DEAL,
James FAIRLEY, Philip FILNER, Paul KINDEL, Hans LILLEVIK, Richard LUECKE, Veronica MAHER,
David MCCONNELL, Justin MCCORMICK, Allan MORRIS, Fritz ROTTMAN, John SPECK, Clarence SWELTER,
Charles SWEELEY, N. E. TOLBERT, Jack WATSON, William WELLS, John WILSON, Willis WOOD
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Deborah DELMER, Pamela FRAKER, William SMITH
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Jerry DODGSON, Edward FRITSCH, Roger KOBES, Hsing Jien KUNG,
Shelagh Ferguson MILLER, Arnold REVZIN, Melvin SCHINDLER, Karel SCHUBERT, John WANG
OTHER STAFF : Susan HAWKES, John HOLLAND
SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
I. ( ) DISTINGUISHED
2. ( ) STRONG
3. ( ) GOOD
4. ( ) ADEQUATE
S. ( ) MARvINAL
6. ( ) NOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
FAMI LIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
l. ( ) CONSIDERABlE FAMILIARITY
2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY
3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE
2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE
3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
4. ( ) N07 EFFECTIVE
O. ( ) DON' r KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
1. ( ) BETTER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST fIVE YEAR
3. ( ) POORER THAN fIVE YEARS AGO
l
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
INSTITUTION: UNIV OF ILLINOIS AT THE NED CTR, CHICAGO FORM NO. 2203-03
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 25
PROFESSORS: Michael BARANY, Clyde C. DOUGHTY, Henry GEWURZ, Mary Sue HANLON, Thomas O. HENDERSON,
Henry JEFFAY, Janos MOLNAR, Terrell C. MYERS, Mariano TAO, Edward B. TITCHENER, dames VARY,
Bernard WEISSMAN
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Charalampos ARSENIS, Bernard FRIEDENSON, Paul MORRIS, Tarakad RAJKUMAR,
Newton RESSLER
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Robert V. STORTI
SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
~ . ( ) DI so I NGU I SHED
2. ( ) STRONG
3. ( ) GOOD
4. ( ) ADEQUATE
5. ( ) MARGINAL
6. ( ) NOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY
2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY
3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN E LOCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFfECTIVE
2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE
3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
4. ( ) N07 EFFECTIVE
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH 70 EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
1. ( ) BETTER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST FIVE YEAR
3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
Representative terms from entire chapter:
biological chemistry
