Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 227
APPENDI X C
LETTER TO EVALUATORS
COMMITTEE ON AN ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY-RELATED CHARACTERISTICS
OF RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATES
Established by the Conference Board of Associated Research Councils
Office of the Staff Director / Natiorsal Research Council / 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. / Washington, D.C. 20418
April 14, 1981
Dear
As you may already know, our committee has undertaken an assessment
of research-doctorate programs in U.S. universities. The study is exam-
ining approximately 2,650 programs in 31 fields in the arts and humanities,
biological sciences, engineering, physical and mathematical sciences, and
social sciences. A study prospectus is provided on the reverse of this
page. You have been selected from a faculty list furnished by your institu-
tion to evaluate programs offering research-doctorates in the field of
Psychology.
On the first page of the attached form is a list of the 150 programs
that are being evaluated in this field. These programs produce more than 90
percent of the doctorate recipients in the field. In order to keep the task
manageable, you are being asked to consider a randomly selected subset of
50 of these programs. These are designated with an asterisk in the list on
the next page and are presented in random sequence on the evaluation sheets
that follow. Please read the accompanying instructions carefully before
attempting your evaluations.
We ask that you complete the attached survey form and return it in the
enclosed envelope within the next three weeks. The evaluations you and
your colleagues render will constitute an important component of this study.
Your prompt attention to this request will be very much appreciated by our
committee.
Sincerely,
I..
Gil
-aim-/ V A,,,.,
Lyle Jones
For the Study Committee
Enclosures
COMMITTEE MEMBERS Marcus Alexis Winfred P. Lehmann Kumar Patel
Robert M. Bock Saunders Mac Lane Michael 1. Pelczar, Jr.
Lyle V. Jones, Co-Chairman Philip E. Converse Nancy S. Milburn Jerome B. Schneewind
Gardner Lindzey, Co-Chairman James H. M. Henderson Lincoln E. Moses Duane C. Spriestersbach
Paul A. Albrecht Ernest S. Kuh James C. Olson Harriet A. Zuckerman
227
OCR for page 228
228
RESEARCH-DOCTORATE PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF PSYCHOLOGY
(* DESIGNATES THE PROGRAMS WHICH YOU ARE ASKED TO EVALUATE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES.)
INSTITUTION - DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT
*
ADELPHI UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA, TUSCALOOSA - EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, TEMPE - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, TUCSON - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, FAYETTEVILLE - PSYCHOLOGY
AUBURN UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY, WACO - PSYCHOLOGY
ROSEMEAD GRAD SCH OF PROF PSYCHOLOGY - SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
BOSTON UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
BROWN UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE - PSYCHOLOGY
PROF PSYCHOLOGY, SAN DIEGO - PSYCHOLOGY
PROF PSYCHOLOGY, BERKELEY - PSYCHOLOGY
CALIF SCH OF
CALIF SCH OF
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MANIA BARBARA - PSYCHOLOGY
CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY - CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI - PSYCHOLOGY
CUNY, THE GRADUATE SCHOOL - PSYCHOLOGY
CLAREMONT GRADUATE SCHOOL - PSYCHOLOGY
CLARK UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, FT COLLINS - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER - PSYCHOLOGY
COLUMBIA UNIV-GRAD SCHOOL OF ARTS ~ SCI - PSYCHOLOGY
TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIV - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, STORES - PSYCHOLOGY
CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE, NEWARK - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
BERKELEY - PSYCHOLOGY
DAVIS - PSYCHOLOGY
IRVINE - PSYCHOBIOLOGY (SCHOOL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES)
IRVINE - COGNITIVE SCI/SOCIAL RELATIONS (SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCI)
LOS ANGELES - PSYCHOLOGY
RIVERSIDE - PSYCHOLOGY
SAN DIEGO - PSYCHOLOGY
- PSYCHOLOGY
DE PAUL UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT - PSYCHOLOGY
DUKE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
EMORY UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
* FORDHAM UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY (PASADENA) - PSYCHOLOGY
* GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
* GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, ATLANTA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA, ATHENS - PSYCHOLOGY
HARVARD UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL RELATIONS
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII - PSYCHOLOGY
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - PSYCHOLOGY
ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIV OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, CHICAGO CIRCLE - PSYCHOLOGY
INDIANA UNIVERSITY, BLOOMINGTON - PSYCHOLOGY
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, AMES - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, IOWA CITY - PSYCHOLOGY
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, MANHATTAN - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS - HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND FAMILY LIFE
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS - PSYCHOLOGY
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY - PSYCHOLOGY
LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, THE BROOKLYN CENTER - PSYCHOLOGY
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, BATON ROUGE - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE - PSYCHOLOGY
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK - PSYCHOLOGY
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST - PSYCHOLOGY
MIAMI UNIVERSITY (OHIO) - PSYCHOLOGY
OCR for page 229
229
*
,,:
*
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI (FLORIDA) - PSYCHOLOGY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST LANSING - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI, OXFORD - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, COLUMBIA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA, MISSOULA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, LINCOLN - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, ALBUQUERQUE - PSYCHOLOGY
NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH (NYC) - PSYCHOLOGY
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHAPEL HILL - PSYCHOLOGY
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, RALEIGH - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, GREENSBORO - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA, GRAND FORKS - PSYCHOLOGY
NORTH TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY, DENTON - PSYCHOLOGY
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, DE KALE - PSYCHOLOGY
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME - PSYCHOLOGY
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
OHIO UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY, STILLWATER - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, EUGENE - PSYCHOLOGY
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - PSYCHOLOGY
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
PURDUE UNIVERSITY, WEST LAFAYETTE - PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND - PSYCHOLOGY
RICE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER - PSYCHOLOGY
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, NEW BRUNSWICK - PSYCHOLOGY
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY, NEWARK - PSYCHOLOGY
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA, VERMILLION - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA - PSYCHOLOGY
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, CARBONDALE - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIV OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI, HATTIESBURG - PSYCHOLOGY
STANFORD UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, GAINESVILLE - PSYCHOLOGY
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY, TALLAHASSEE - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, TAMPA - PSYCHOLOGY
SUNY AT ALBANY - PSYCHOLOGY
SUNY AT BINGHAMTON - PSYCHOLOGY
SUNY AT BUFFALO - PSYCHOLOGY
SUNY AT STONY BROOK - PSYCHOLOGY
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE - PSYCHOLOGY
TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, FORT WORTH - PSYCHOLOGY
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, LUBBOCK - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, AUSTIN - PSYCHOLOGY
TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY, DENTON - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO - PSYCHOLOGY
TULANE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, SALT LAKE CITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UTAH STATE. UNIVERSITY, LOGAN - PSYCHOLOGY
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT - PSYCHOLOGY
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIV - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - PSYCHOLOGY
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, PULLMAN - PSYCHOLOGY
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY (ST LOUIS) - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE - PSYCHOLOGY
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MADISON - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MILWAUKEE - PSYCHOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING - PSYCHOLOGY
YALE UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
YESHIVA UNIVERSITY - PSYCHOLOGY
OCR for page 230
230
INSTRUCTIONS
At the top of the next page please provide the information requested on the
highest degree you hold and your current field of specialization. You may be assured
that all information you furnish on the survey form is to be used for purposes of
statistical Description only and that the confidentiality of your responses will be
protected.
On the pages that follow you are asked to judge 50 programs (presented in
random sequence) that offer the research-doctorate. Each program is to be evaluated
in terms of: (1) scholarly quality of program faculty; (2) effectiveness of program
in educating research scholars/scientists; and (3) change in program quality in the
last five years (see below). Although the assessment is limited to these factors,
our committee recognizes that other factors are relevant to the quality of doctoral
programs, and that graduate programs serve important purposes in addition to that
of educating doctoral candidates.
a list of the faculty members signficantly involved in each program, the name
of the academic unit in which the program is offered, and the number of doctorates
awarded in that program during the last five years have been printed on the survey
form (whenever available). Although this information has been furnished to us
by the institution and is believed to be accurate, it has not been verified by our
study committee and may have a few omissions, misspellings, or other errors.
Before marking your responses on the survey form, you may find it helpful to
look over the full set of programs you are being asked to evaluate. In making your
judgments about each program, please keep in mind the following instructions:
(1) Scholarly Quality of Program Facultv. Check the box next to
the term that most closely corresponds to your judgment of the
quality of faculty in the research-doctorate program described.
Consider only the scholarTy competence and achievements of the
faculty, It is suggested that no more than five programs be
designated "distinguished."
(2) Effectiveness of Program in Educating Research Scholars/Scientists.
Check the box next to the term that most closely corresponds
to your judgment of the doctoral program's effectiveness in
educating research scholars/scientists. Consider the access-
ibility of the faculty, the curricula, the instructional and
research facilities, the quality of graduate students, the
performance of the graduates, and other factors that contribute
to the effectiveness of the research-doctorate program.
Change in Program Oualilv in Last Five Years. Check the box
next to the term that most closely corresponds to your esti-
mate of the change that has taken place in the research-
doctorate program in the last five years. Consider both the
scholarly quality of the program faculty and the effectiveness
of the program in educating research scholars/scientists. Com-
pare the quality of the program today with its quality five years
ago--not the change in the programs relative standing among
other programs in the field.
In assessing each of these factors, mark the category "Don't know well enough
to evaluate" if you are unfamiliar with that aspect of the program. It is quite
possible that for some programs you may be knowledgeable about the scholarly quality
of the faculty, but not about the effectiveness of the program or change in program
quality.
For each of the programs identified, you are also asked to indicate the extent
to which you are familiar with the work of members of the program faculty. For example,
if you recognize only a very small fraction of the faculty, you should mark the
category "Little or no familiarity."
Please be certain that you have provided a set of responses for each of the
programs identified on the following pages. The fully completed survey form should
be returned in the enclosed envelope to:
Committee on an Assessment of Quality-Related
Characteristics of Research-Doctorate Programs
National Research Council, JH-638
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20418
Our committee will be most appreciative of. your thoughtful assessment of these research-
doctorate programs. We welcome any comments you may wish to append to the completed
survey form.
OCR for page 231
231
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
HIGHEST DEGREE YOU HOLD: ( ) PH.D. ( ) OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):
YEAR OF HIGHEST DEGREE:
INSTITUTION OF HIGHEST DEGREE:
YOUR CURRENT FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION (CHECK ONLY ONE):
A. ( ) CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
B. ( ) COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE
C. ( ) DEVELOPMENTAL/GERONTOLOGICAL
PSYCHOLOGY
D. ( ) EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
E. ( ) EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
F. ( ) INDUSTRIAL/PERSONNEL PSYCH.
FORM NO. 4126-76
G. ( ) PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
H. ( ) PSYCHOMETRICS
I. ( ) SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY
J. ( ) SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
K. ( ) PSYCHOLOGY, GENERAL
L. ( ) OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):
INSTITUTION: UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, LINCOLN
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: PSYCHOLOGY
TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 67
FORM NO. 4t26-01
PROFESSORS: William d. ARNOLD, James K. COLE, Richard A. DIENSTBIER, Frank J. DUDEK. Herbert HOWE,
Donald D. JENSEN, Alvin W. LANDFIELD, Monte M. PAGE, Bruce D. SALES, Harry P. SHELLEY,
Theo P. SONDEREGGER
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: John d. BERMAN, Virginia A. BERMAN, Daniel d. BERNSTEIN, dames L. CONNOR,
John H. FLOWERS, David Scott HARGROVE, P. Clayton RIVERS, Brian P. V. SARATA
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Natalie P. PORTER, William D. SPAULDING
SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) DISTINGUISHED
2. ( ) STRONG
3. ( ) GOOD
4. ( ) ADEQUATE
5. ( ) MARGINAL
6. ( ~ HOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY
2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY
3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE
2. ( J REASONABLY EFFECTIVE
3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
4. ( ) NOT EfFECTIVE
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
1. ( ) BETTER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST FIVE YEAR
3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
OCR for page 232
232
INSTITUTION: UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, SALT LAKE CITY FORM NO. 4126-02
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: PSYCHOLOGY
TOTAL DOCTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 71
PROFESSORS: James F. ALEXANDER, Irwin ALTMAN, Ernst G. BEIER, Martin M. CHEMERS, Victor B. CLINK,
Leslie COOPER, Donna M. GELFAND, Oakley J. GORDON, Donald P. HARTMANN, William A. JOHNSTON,
Raymond P. KESNER, Michael E. LAMB, Marigold LINTON, Harold C. NIELSON, Paul B. PORTER,
David C. RASKIN, Charles P. SHIMP, Calvin W. TAYLOR, Charles N. UHL, B. Jack WHITE
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: David H. DODD, Thomas MALLOY, Richard F. SMITH, Charles W. TURNER,
Carol WERNER
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: S. W. MILLER, Frederick RHODEWALT, Barbara ROGOFF, Donald S. STRASSBERG
SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) DISTINGUISHED
2. ( ) STRONG
3. ( J GOOD
4. ( ) ADEQUATE
5. ( ) MARGINAL
6. ( ) NOT SUfFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH JO EVALUATE
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY
2. ( ) SOME fAMILIARITY
3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFfECTIVE
2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE
3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
4. ( ) NOT EFFECTIVE
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
1. ( ) BETTER THAN fIVE YEARS AGO
2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST FIVE YEAR
3. ( ) POORER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
INSTITUTION: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, GAINESVILLE FORM NO. 4126-03
DEPARTMENT/ACADEMIC UNIT: PSYCHOLOGY
TOTAL W CTORATES AWARDED 1976-80: 126
PROFESSORS: Yvonne BRACKBILL, William W. DAWSON, Donald A. DEWSBURY, Franz R. EPTING,
Jacquelin R. GOLDMAN, Harry A. GRATER dr, Charles M. LEVY dr, Norman N. MARKEL, Merle E. MEYER,
Henry S. PENNYPACKER Jr, Nathan W. PERRY Jr, Paul G. SCHAUBLE, Barry R. SCHLENKER, Marvin E. SHAD
Charles J. VIERCK dr, Wilse B. WEBB, Robert C. ZILLER
ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS: Afesa M. BELL, William K. BERG, Marc N. BRANCH, Walter R. CUNNINGHAM,
Ira S. FISCHLER, Richard A. GRIGGS, James M. JOHNSTON, Edward F. MALAGODI Jr, Patricia H. MILLER,
Scott A. MILLER, Dorothy D. NEVILL, Lawrence d. SEVERY, David I. SUCHMAN, Richard M. SWANSON,
Carol VANHARTESVELDT
ASSISTANT PROFESSORS: Hi 1 liam J. FROMING, Benjamin J. ROBERTS, Richard R. SCOTT, Carolyn M. TUCKER
Robert d. WALDBILLIG, Keith D. WHITE
OTHER STAFF: Benjamin BARGER, Rosie P. BINGHAM, Joseph M. KOLARIK
SCHOLARLY QUALITY OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) DISTINGUISHED
2. ( ) STRONG
3. ( ) GOOD
4. ( ) ADEQUATE
5. ( ) MARGINAL
6. ( ) NOT SUFFICIENT FOR DOCTORAL EDUCATION
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
FAMILIARITY WITH WORK OF PROGRAM FACULTY
1. ( ) CONSIDERABLE FAMILIARITY
2. ( ) SOME FAMILIARITY
3. ( ) LITTLE OR NO FAMILIARITY
EFFECTIVENESS OF PROGRAM IN EDUCATING RESEARCH
SCHOLARS/SCIENTISTS
1. ( ) EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE
2. ( ) REASONABLY EFFECTIVE
3. ( ) MINIMALLY EFFECTIVE
4. ( ) NOT EFFECTIVE
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
CHANGE IN PROGRAM QUALITY IN LAST FIVE YEARS
1. ( ) BETTER THAN FIVE YEARS AGO
2. ( ) LITTLE OR NO CHANGE IN LAST fIVE YEAR
3. ( ) POORER THAN fIVE YEARS AGO
O. ( ) DON'T KNOW WELL ENOUGH TO EVALUATE
Representative terms from entire chapter:
program faculty
