National Academies Press: OpenBook

Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report (2000)

Chapter: Front Matter

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×

TESTS AND Teaching Quality

Interim Report

Committee on Assessment and Teacher Quality

Board on Testing and Assessment

National Research Council

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, DC

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×

NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

The study was supported by U.S. Department of Education (award R215U990004). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project.

International Standard Book Number 0-309-06946-7

Additional copies of this report are available from:

National Academy Press
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418
Call (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area). This report is also available online at http://www.nap.edu

Suggested citation: National Research Council (2000) Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Committee on Assessment and Teaching Quality, Board on Testing and Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Printed in the United States of America

Copyright 2000 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

National Academy of Sciences

National Academy of Engineering

Institute of Medicine

National Research Council

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×

COMMITTEE ON ASSESSMENT AND TEACHER QUALITY

DAVID Z. ROBINSON

(Chair),

Carnegie Corporation of New York

ANDY BAUMGARTNER,

William Robinson Center, Augusta, GA

JOHN T. BRUER,

James S. McDonnell Foundation, St. Louis, MO

CARL A. GRANT,

Department of Teacher Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison

MILTON D. HAKEL,

Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University

LINDA DARLING-HAMMOND,

School of Education, Stanford University

ABIGAIL L. HUGHES,

Connecticut State Department of Education

MARY M. KENNEDY,

College of Education, Michigan State University

STEPHEN P. KLEIN,

RAND, Santa Monica, CA

KATE MANSKI,

Department of English, University of Illinois-Chicago

C. FORD MORISHITA,

Clackamas High School, Milwaukie, OR

PAMELA A. MOSS,

Department of Education, University of Michigan

BARBARA STERRETT PLAKE,

Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

DAVID L. ROSE,

Rose and Rose, Attorneys at Law, Washington, DC

PORTIA HOLMES SHIELDS,

Ofice of the President, Albany State University

JAMES STIGLER,

Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles

KEN I. WOLPIN,

Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania

ROBERT ROTHMAN,

Study Director

KAREN MITCHELL,

Senior Program Officer

KAELI KNOWLES,

Program Officer

DOROTHY MAJEWSKI,

Senior Project Assistant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×

BOARD ON TESTING AND ASSESSMENT

ROBERT L. LINN

(Chair),

School of Education, University of Colorado, Boulder

CARL F. KAESTLE

(Vice Chair),

Department of Education, Brown University

RICHARD C. ATKINSON,

President,

University of California

PAUL J. BLACK,

School of Education, King's College, London, England

RICHARD P. DURÁN,

Graduate School of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara

CHRISTOPHER F. EDLEY, JR.,

Harvard Law School, Harvard University

RONALD FERGUSON,

John F. Kennedy School of Public Policy, Harvard University

ROBERT M. HAUSER,

Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin

PAUL W. HOLLAND,

Graduate School of Education, University of California, Berkeley

RICHARD M. JAEGER,

Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, University of North Carolina

BARBARA M. MEANS,

SRI International, Menlo Park, CA

LORRAINE MCDONNELL,

Department of Political Science, University of California, Santa Barbara

KENNETH PEARLMAN,

Lucent Technologies, Inc., Warren, NJ

ANDREW C. PORTER,

Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison

CATHERINE E. SNOW,

Graduate School of Education, Harvard University

WILLIAM L. TAYLOR,

Attorney at Law,

Washington, DC

WILLIAM T. TRENT,

Associate Chancellor,

University of Illinois, Champaign

VICKI VANDAVEER,

The Vandaveer Group, Inc., Houston, TX

LAURESS L. WISE,

Human Resources Research Organization, Alexandria, VA

KENNETH I. WOLPIN,

Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania

MICHAEL J. FEUER,

Director

VIOLA C. HOREK,

Administrative Associate

LISA ALSTON,

Administrative Assistant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×

Acknowledgments

This report benefited from the insights and support of a number of people, and the committee is grateful for their contributions. We want first of all to acknowledge our sponsors, who made the project possible and kept it going. At the U.S. Department of Education, Terry K. Dozier backed the project enthusiastically and made it a priority at the department. Thelma Leenhouts showed a continuing interest in the project and kept us apprised of events and publications that would assist us in our work.

The committee was also aided greatly by individuals who participated in our meetings and helped us understand the complex issues involved in teacher licensure testing. Carolyn Maidon of the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, Maureen Carvan of the Ohio Department of Education, Pat Glenn of the Illinois Department of Education, and Raymond Pecheone of the Connecticut State Department of Education provided information about their states' systems for licensing teachers, and Drew Gitomer of the Educational Testing Service, Richard Allan of National Evaluation Systems Inc., and Jean Miller of the Interstate New Teachers Assessment and Support Consortium helped us understand the role of testing organizations.

At our third meeting, a panel of recent graduates from Albany State University—Joycelyn Hagans, Tesharra Starling, and VaShaun Harper —described for us their experience as test takers. Joan Baratz-Snowden of the American Federation of Teachers and Nesa Chappelle of the National Education Association discussed testing issues from the perspective of their memberships.

The committee also commissioned several papers to provide a range of

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×

perspectives on criteria for evaluating licensure systems. Linda Crocker of the University of Florida, Mary Hatwood Futrell of George Washington University, Dan Goldhaber of the Urban Institute, Richard Jaeger of the University of North Carolina-Greensboro, P. Richard Jeanneret of Jeanneret and Associates, and Diana Pullin of Boston University were generous in sharing their thoughts and research on the issues involved.

Within the National Research Council, a number of individuals helped us keep the project moving forward. Barbara Boyle Torrey, executive director of the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, enthusiastically backed the project and lent us her wisdom and advice at key stages. Michael J. Feuer, director of the Board on Testing and Assessment, was a guiding force behind the project and provided substantive advice and moral support throughout the process. Eugenia Grohman's skillful editing was indispensible, and her knowledge and experience guided us through the NRC's report review process.

The committee's staff worked extremely hard and skillfully to enable us to produce this report. Robert Rothman, Karen Mitchell, and Kaeli Knowles helped ensure that the meetings were informative and productive, and developed numerous drafts and revisions. Dorothy Majewski, the senior project assistant, handled the logistics of our work with dexterity and good humor.

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC's Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

We wish to thank the following individuals for their participation in the review of this report: Edward Haertel, School of Education, Stanford University; Robert Hauser, Center for Demography, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Henry M. Levin, Departments of Economics and Education, Teachers College, Columbia University; Robert L. Linn, School of Education, University of Colorado, Boulder; Duncan Luce, Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Science, University of California, Irvine; Carolyn Morse, Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina; Richard Murnane, Graduate School of Education, Harvard University; Edward Rossiter, Newton North High School, Newton, MA; and Paul Sackett, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.

Although these individuals provided many constructive comments and suggestions, responsibility for the final content of this report rests solely with the authoring committee and the institution.

David Z. Robinson, Chair

Committee on Assessment and Teacher Quality

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2000. Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9788.
×
Page R10
Next: Executive Summary »
Tests and Teaching Quality: Interim Report Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $21.00 Buy Ebook | $16.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Improving the quality of teaching in elementary and secondary schools is now high on the nation's educational policy agenda. Policy makers at the state and federal levels have focused on initiatives designed to improve the abilities of teachers already in schools and increase the numbers of well-qualified teachers available to fill current and future vacancies.

Tests and Teaching Quality is an interim report of a study investigating the technical, educational, and legal issues surrounding the use of tests for licensing teachers. This report focuses on existing tests and their use.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!