Questions? Call 888-624-8373

HARDBACK + PDF
your price: $58.50
add to cart

HARDBACK
list:$49.95
Web:$44.96
add to cart

PDF BOOK
your price: $38.50
add to cart

PDF CHAPTERS
your price: $5.70
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Natural Attenuation for Groundwater Remediation (2000)
Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER)

Page
128
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Natural Attenuation for Groundwater Remediation

aerobic reactions must occur at rates that adequately protect the food chain and human health.

A recent study (McNulty, 1997) carefully retrieved, dated, and chemically analyzed sediment samples taken from different depths of the river bottom. In a highly contaminated section of river sediments, significant dechlorination of PCBs had occurred, but the dechlorination rate decreased dramatically after about a year. Even after years to decades, complete dechlorination of PCBs had not occurred. Furthermore, at a moderately contaminated section of sediments, only initial signs of dechlorination had developed. Thus, the observed footprints of PCB dechlorination, although encouraging, are insufficient in themselves to ensure that natural attenuation will be sufficient to decrease contaminant concentrations to meet regulatory standards.

South Glens Falls, New York: Natural Attenuation of PAHs Following Source Removal

The Electric Power Research Institute and Niagara Mohawk Power Company collaborated to assess how removing the contaminant source at a coal tar disposal site would affect natural attenuation of dissolved contaminants from coal tar remaining in groundwater (Taylor et al., 1996). The study area is located in a rural setting near South Glens Falls, New York. The site was used for disposal of tar from a single event that occurred in the early 1960s at a plant that manufactured gas. The site was ideal for study because the contaminant source and hydrogeology are relatively simple. Because the contamination resulted from a single disposal event, there was only one coal tar source, with no unknown residuals, making source characterization relatively straightforward compared to more complex sites. The hydrogeologic setting is an aquifer composed of coarse to fine silty sands, with a confining layer 6 to 9 m (20 to 30 ft) below ground surface preventing extensive downward migration of the contamination. The groundwater velocity is about 12 m (40 ft) per year.

Source removal commenced in May 1991 with installation of a sheet pile enclosure driven to a depth of more than 12 m (40 ft), well below the confining layer 7.6 m (25 ft). Despite the relatively simple hydrologic setting, locating and thoroughly removing the coal tar source material were technically difficult. The enclosed area was about 1,000 m2 (0.25 acre), and approximately 7,200 m3 (9,400 yd3) of tar-contaminated soil and overburden were removed. In October 1991, the sheet pile was removed, and the excavated area was filled with clean native soil with a grain size similar to that of the removed soil.

Figure 3-16 shows an areal view of concentrations of naphthalene—one of the key constituents dissolved from the coal tar—in June 1990 just

Page
128