National Academies Press: OpenBook

Research Needs in Subsurface Science (2000)

Chapter: References

« Previous: 6 Recommendations for a Long-Term Research Program
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2000. Research Needs in Subsurface Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9793.
×
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2000. Research Needs in Subsurface Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9793.
×
Page 132
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2000. Research Needs in Subsurface Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9793.
×
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2000. Research Needs in Subsurface Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/9793.
×
Page 134

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

References Agnew, S.F., ]. Boyer, R.A. Corbin, T.B. Duran, ].R. Fitzpatrick, K.A. Jurgensen, T.P. Ortiz, and B.L. Young.1997. Hanford Tank Chemical and Radionuclide Inventories: HOW Model, Rev. 4. Report LA-UR- 96-3860. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. Albright, ].N., and D.S. Dreesen. 2000. Microhole technology lowers reservoir exploration, characterization costs. Oil and Gas journal (January 10~:39-41. DOE (Department of Energy).1995. Closing the Circle on the Splitting of the Atom: The Environmental Legacy of Nuclear Weapons Production in the United States and What the Department of Energy Is Doing About It. DOE/EM-0266. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE.1996. The 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report (2 volumes). DOE/EM-0290. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE.1997a. Linking Legacies: Connecting the Cold War Nuclear Weapons Production Processes to Their Environmental Consequences. DOE/EM-0319. Wash ington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE.1997b. Subsurface Contaminants Focus Area 1997 Annual Report. DOE/EM-0361. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE.1998a. Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure. DOE/EM-0362. Wash i ngton, D.C.: Office of Envi ran mental Management. DOE.1998b. Groundwater/\/adose Zone Integration Project Specification. DOE/RL-98-48. Draft C. December 17. Richland, Washington: Department of Energy. DOE.1998c. Environmental Management Science Program Workshop. CONF-980736. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. R e f e r e n c e s 131

DOE.1998d. Subsurface Contaminants Focus Area 1998 Annual Report. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE.1998e. The Current and Planned Low-Level Waste Disposal Capacity Report, Revision 1. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE.1998f. Environmental Management Research and Development Plan: Solution-Based Investments in Science and Technology. Wash i ngton, D.C.: Office of Envi ran mental Management. DOE.1998g. Report to Congress on the U.S. Department of Energy's Environmental Management Science Program: Research Funded and Its Linkages to Environmental Cleanup Problems (3 volumes). DOE/EM-0357. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. DOE.1999. From Cleanup to Stewardship. DOE/EM-0466. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).1977. Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends. EPA 542-R- 96-005. Washington, D.C.: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Gephart, R.E., and R.E. Lundgren. 1998. Hanford Tank Clean Up: A Guide to Understanding the Technical Issues. Richland, Wash i ngton: Battel le Press. Hamel, G., and C.K. Prahalad.1989. Strategy and Intent. Harvard Business Review (May-june): 63. Hunt, ].R., N. Sitar, and K.S. Udell.1986a. Nonaqueous phase liquid transport and cleanup: 1. analysis of mechanisms. Water Resources Research 24~8~: 1247-1258. Hunt, J.R., N. Sitar, and K.S. Udell.1986b. Nonaqueous phase liquid transport and cleanup: 11. experimental studies. Water Resources Research 24~8~: 1259-1269. Illangasekare, T.H., ].L. Ramsey, K.S. Jensen, and M.B. Butts.1995. Experimental study of movement and distribution of dense organic contaminants in heterogenous aquifers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 20: 1-25. INEEL (Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory). 1997. Decision Analysis for Remediation Technologies (DART) Data Base and User's Manual. INEEL/EXT-97-01052, Idaho Falls, Idaho: IN EEL. Karsting, A. B., D.W. Efurd, D.L. Finnegan, D.J. Rokop, D.K. Smith, and J.L. Thompson.1999. Migration of plutonium in ground water at the Nevada Test Site. Nature 397: 56-59. Kueper, B.H., and E.O. Frind.1991. Two-phase flow in heterogeneous porous media 1. model development. Water Resources Research 27~6~: 1049-1057. S U B S U R F A C E S C ~ E N C E

N RC (National Research Counci 1~.1966. Committee on Geological Aspects of Radioactive Waste Disposal: Report to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC.1994. Alternatives for Ground Water Cleanup. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC.1995. Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC.1996a. Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program: Initial Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC.1996b. Letter Report on the Environmental Management Science Program Dated October 6. Washington, D.C.: Board on Radioactive Waste Management, National Research Council. NRC.1997a. Innovations in Ground Water and Soil Cleanup: From Concept to Commercial ization. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC.1997b. Building an Effective Environmental Management Science Program: Final Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC.1997c. Improving the Environment: An Evaluation of DOE's Environmental Management Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC.1998. Letter Report on the Environmental Management Science Program Dated December 10. Washington, D.C.: Board on Radioactive Waste Management, National Research Council. N RC.1999. Ground Water and Soi I Cleanup: I mproving Management of Persistent Contaminants. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Olsen, C.R., I.L. Larsen, P.D. Lowry, C.R. Moriones, Cal. Ford, K.C. Dearstone, R.R. Turner, B.L. Kimmel, and C.C. Brandt.1992. Transport and accumulation of cesium-137 and mercury in the Clinch River and Watts Bar Reservoir System. ORNL/ER-7. Oak Ridge, Ten nessee: Oak Ridge N ational Laboratory. PfannVuch, H.O. 1984. Determination of the contaminant source strength from mass exchange processes at the petroleum ground- water interface in shallow aquifer systems. In Proceedings of the NWWA Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Groundwater, pp.111-129. Dublin, Ohio: National Well Water Association. Pielke, R.A., and R. Byerly.1998. Beyond basic and applied. Physics Today (February): 42-46. Reidel, S.P., K.A. Lindsey, and K.R. Fecht.1992. Field Trip Guide to the Hanford Site. WHC-MR-0391. Richland, Washington: Westinghouse Hanford Co. - R e f e r e n c e s 133

Riley R.G., and ].M. Zachara.1992. Chemical Contaminants on DOE Lands and Selection of Contaminated Mixtures for Subsurface Science Research. DOE/ER-0547T. Washington, D.C.: Office of Energy Research. Roussel, P.A., K.N. Saad, and TV. Erickson.1991. Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press. Sandia National Laboratories.1996. Performance Evaluation of the Technical Capabilities of DOE Sites for Disposal of Mixed Low-Level Waste. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories. Schwille, F. 1988. Dense Chlorinated Solvents in Porous and Fractured Media. (Translated by ]. F. Pan kow). Chelsea, Michigan: Lewis Publ ishers. Thorpe, R.K., W.F. Isherwood, M.D. Dresen, and C.P. Webster-Sholten (eds.~.1990. CERCLA Remedial Investigations Report for the LLNL Livermore Site. UCAR-10299. Livermore, California: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Tompson, A.F.B., R.D. Falgout, S.G. Smith, W.~. Bosl, and S.F. Ashby, 1998. Analysis of subsurface contaminant migration and remedia- tion using high performance computing. Advances in Water Resources 23~3~: 203-221. (This paper can be viewed in electronic form at http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/advwatres, where a number of animated sequences are available to more clearly visualize the effects of heterogeneity.) Walker, ].B., and P.~. Liebendorfer. 1998. Long-term stewardship at the Nevada Test Site. Paper prepared for the State Tribal Government Working Group Subcommittee on Stewardship. (http://207.12.87.1 /nucwaste/nts/steward. htm#contami nation) Westinghouse Savannah River Company.1995. A/M Area Groundwater Cleanup. Fact Sheet. Aiken, South Carolina: Savannah River Operations Office. Westinghouse Savannah River Company.1998. Savannah River Site Burial Ground Complex. Fact Sheet. Aiken, South Carolina: Savannah River Operations Office. S U B S U R F A C E S C ~ E N C E 134

Next: Appendix A Description of the Environmental Management Science Program »
Research Needs in Subsurface Science Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $75.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Research Needs in Subsurface Science provides an overview of the subsurface contamination problems across the DOE complex and shows by examples from the six largest DOE sites (Hanford Site, Idaho Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Nevada Test Site, Oak Ridge Reservation, Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, and Savannah River Site) how advances in scientific and engineering knowledge can improve the effectiveness of the cleanup effort. This report analyzes the current Environmental Management (EM) Science Program portfolio of subsurface research projects to assess the extent to which the program is focused on DOE's contamination problems. This analysis employs an organizing scheme that provides a direct linkage between basic research in the EM Science Program and applied technology development in DOE's Subsurface Contaminants Focus Area.

Research Needs in Subsurface Science also reviews related research programs in other DOE offices and other federal agencies (see Chapter 4) to determine the extent to which they are focused on DOE's subsurface contamination problems. On the basis of these analyses, this report singles out the highly significant subsurface contamination knowledge gaps and research needs that the EM Science Program must address if the DOE cleanup program is to succeed.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!