The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED PEST-PROTECTED PLANTS: SCIENCE AND REGULATION
ES.7 OPERATIONAL ASPECTS AND IMPACTS OF THE COORDINATED FRAMEWORK
ES.7.1 Elements of an Effective Regulatory Framework
The committee finds that, operating under the coordinated framework, EPA, USDA, and FDA have successfully applied existing statutes to address the introduction of transgenic pest-protected plant products, but concludes that there is room for improvement. In particular, those agencies have achieved a significant degree of coordination in their oversight of transgenic pest-protected plants, but certain aspects of this coordination could be enhanced. Only through effective coordination can the three lead agencies minimize duplication, avoid inconsistent regulatory decisions, address potential gaps in oversight, and ensure that regulations evolve with experience and scientific advancements. Ultimately, the credibility of the regulatory process and acceptance of products of biotechnology depend heavily on the public's ability to understand the process and the key scientific principles on which it is based.
The committee identified five elements of an effective regulatory system which support the objectives of the coordinated framework (Box ES.1).
For example, to improve the transparency of the regulatory process under the coordinated framework, the committee recommends that
The quantity, quality and public accessibility of information onthe regulation of transgenic pest-protected plant products shouldbe expanded.
The USDA-sponsored coordinated framework database to link agencies ' regulations and decisions (USDA 1999e) is useful, but should be
Elements that Support the Objectives of the Coordinated Framework
Consistency of definitions and regulatory scope.
Clear establishment of lead and supporting agencies with a mechanism for effective interagency communication.
Consistency of statements of information to support reviews.