were associated with increased growth of macroalgae and tropical seagrasses. Lapointe and Matzie (1996) showed that episodic rainfall events led to higher submarine discharge rates that were followed within days by hypoxic oxygen levels.
The occurrence of hypoxic and anoxic bottom waters may also lead to shifts in benthic and pelagic community structure due to the mortality of less mobile or more sensitive taxa, reduction of suitable habitat, and shifts in predator-prey interactions (Diaz and Rosenberg 1995). Hypoxia plays a major role in the structuring of benthic communities because species differ in the sensitivity to oxygen reduction (Diaz and Rosenberg 1995). The response of species to reduced oxygen availability also depends on the frequency and duration of these events. With short bouts of hypoxia, some large or very motile species are able to adjust to or move away from the stress.
Hypoxia tends to shift the benthic community from being dominated by large long-lived species to being dominated by smaller opportunistic short-lived species (Pearson and Rosenberg 1978). In addition, recurring hypoxia may limit successional development to colonizing communities. In such systems more organic matter is available for remineralization by the microbial community. This can decrease the amount of energy available for benthic recruitment when hypoxia and anoxia disappears. Zoo-plankton that normally vertically migrate into bottom waters during the day may be more susceptible to fish predation if they are forced to restrict their activity to the oxic surficial waters. Roman et al. (1993) concluded that the vertical distribution of copepods in the Chesapeake Bay was altered by the presence of hypoxic bottom waters. Moreover, an hypoxic or anoxic bottom layer may constitute a barrier that de-couples the life cycle of pelagic species (e.g., diatoms, dinoflagellates, and copepods) that have benthic resting stages (Marcus and Boero 1998).
In a controlled eutrophication experiment (Doering et al. 1989), the structure of the zooplankton community was affected by the presence or absence of an intact benthic community. In the absence of an intact benthic community, holoplanktonic forms, especially higher level predators, dominated, whereas meroplanktonic forms were more evident in the presence of an intact benthic community. Although the data did not identify the mechanism behind these shifts, the differences likely reflected alterations in the coupling of the benthic and pelagic environments (nutrient as well as life cycle linkages) (Marcus and Boero 1998).
Changes in predator-prey interactions in the water column can also lead to shifts in energy flow. Increased fish predation on zooplankton can