|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. 
Figure 6.5 Probability of mission success defined in terms of a specific number of failures: science mission model. missions, whereas the urgency with which data are needed (time to science), tolerance to partial failure, and programmatic flexibility are factors that may override cost considerations in certain research missions. REFERENCESEarth Observing System Project Office (EOS). 1996. Report of the EOS Payload Panel on the GSFC CHEM-1 study. The Earth Observer 8(3). Available online at <http://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/eos_observ/5_6_96/p15.html>. Earth Orbiter-1 (EO-1). 1999. Available online at <http://fdd.gsfc.nasa.gov/missions/eo-1.html>. FLORIDA TODAY Space Online. 1999. Available online at <http://www.flatoday.com/space/>. Raney, R.K., G.H. Fountain, E.J. Hoffman, P.F. Bythrow, and R.H. Maurer. 1995. Small Satellites and NOAA: A Technology Study. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics/Utah State University Conference on Small Satellites, Utah State University, Logan. Rasmussen, A., and R. Tsugawa. 1997. Cost Effective Applications of Constellation Architectures of Large, Medium and Small Satellites. AIAA Paper 97-3950. Reston, Va.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Sarsfield, L. 1997. The Cosmos on a Shoe String: Small Spacecraft for Space and Earth Science. MR-864-OSTP. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, Critical Technologies Institute.
|
|
|||||||||||||||
